Preview

Foucault Tae

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
13060 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Foucault Tae
Chapter I: Background Study

One of the greatest events that challenged the entire Filipino society was the EDSA People power revolution happened on the 25th day of February 1986, a history that put the power on the hands of the Filipino people, considered to be the moment of the great emancipation from coercion. It was an ideal decision that freed the people and won the freedom of right politics. Based on the historical data gathered, the regime of Marcos, although with lots of positive perceptions made him reign for a long period of time, the negative application of force still manifested on the different dimensions of his government, which triggered the people to protest and make an action against. The task of right government which is the social order has vanished in the latter part of his term. The relationship and orientation of things folded into chaos. People, eventually seek for a new reform, a reformation that will lead them somehow to the ideal city, a place where peace, truth, equality and order reign, and this, was marked as the beginning of the modern historical revolution. The Filipino people at that moment, whether not all were totally present still fulfilled the dream of a new reformation. The whole society stood as “Homo Particepts” and “Homo Contemplans” and not as a mere“HomoSpectans”. One of the tasks of government is to maintain the social order in the society. This can be seen in the different institutions and codified laws being implemented within. The authorities also have the objective of making the economy in the summit of progress and not to exclude the oppressed to the map of flourishing. It is also their duty to make balance reciprocity between the elite and the marginalized, a humanitarian implication of social justice in the realm of social order. One of the prominent figures of 20th century Philosophy is Michel Foucault; he explored the shifting patterns of power within a



Bibliography: _______________.Joseph De Torre, Christian Philosophy, (Philippines: Vera- Reyes Inc., 1980) _______________.Post-modernism, For the Beginners _______________.Mariano Artigas, History of Philosophy, (Philippines: Sinag-tala Publishers Inc., 1990) _______________.Paul Rabinow, The Foucault reader, (New York: Random House Inc., 1984) _______________ .Alison Leigh Brown, On Foucault, (U.S.A.: Wadsworth Thomson Learning., 2000) ______________ .Raymond Geuss, The Idea of Critical Theory; Habermas and the Frankfurt School, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., 1981) _______________.Baudrillard, J. The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures. (London: Sage. 1998, 1970) _______________.Edith, Kurzweil, The age of Structuralism; Levi Strauss to Foucault, (New York: Columbian Press., 1980) _______________.Gary Gutting, Foucault; a very short Introduction, (New York: Oxford University Press., 2005) _______________.Gary Gutting, The Cambridge Companion to Foucault, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., 1994) _______________.Hubert L. Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow, Michel Foucault beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, Second Edition, (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press., 1983) _______________.Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of Prison, trans _______________.Sara Mills, Michel Foucault, (London and New York: Routledge; Taylor and Francis Group., 2003, 2004) ______________ .Shumway, Michel Foucault, (U.S.A.: University Press of Virginia., 1989) _______________.E. San Juan, From Globalization to National Liberation; Essay of three decades, (Quezon City: The University of the Philippines Press., 2008) ______________.Onofre D ______________.Alfred McCoy, An Anarchy of Families: State and Families in the Philippines (Madison: University of WisconsinMadison Center for Southeast Asian Studies., 1993) _______________.Paul D _______________.Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, (London: Verso, 1983) Internet references: [ 5 ]. See Foucault on Post-Structuralism, Jim Powell, Post-modernism; for beginners, (U.S.A.: Writers and Readers Publishing Inc., 1998) [ 6 ] [ 7 ]. Paul Rabinow, The Foucault reader, (New York: Random House Inc., 1984), p.4-5. [ 8 ]. Alison Leigh Brown, On Foucault, (U.S.A.: Wadsworth Thomson Learning., 2000), p.21. [ 9 ]. See Wikipedia, on the article about the “Authority” concept, accessed on December 01, 2010. [ 10 ]. Notes in the Philosophy of Science; Thomas Kuhn’s “the structure of scientific revolution”, December 02, 2010. [ 11 ]. Alison Leigh Brown, On Foucault, (U.S.A.: Wadsworth Thomson Learning., 2000),p. 30. [ 12 ]. Notes on Social Critical Theory, A.Y. 2009-2010. [ 19 ]. Gary Gutting, Foucault; a very short Introduction,(New York: Oxford University Press., 2005), p.2. [ 21 ]. See Michel-Foucault.com, Humanism and Death of Man. Accessed on December 18, 2010. [ 22 ]. Alison Leigh Brown, On Foucault, (U.S.A.: Wadsworth Thomson Learning., 2000), p.7. [ 24 ]. Paul Rabinow, The Foucault reader, (New York: Random House Inc., 1984),p. 9. [ 25 ]. Cf. Edith, Kurzweil, The age of Structuralism; Levi Strauss to Foucault, (New York: Columbian Press., 1980), p.205. [ 28 ]. Hubert L. Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow, Michel Foucault Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, Second Edition, (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press., 1983),p.117. [ 31 ]. Code of Hammurabi is collection of the laws and edicts of the Babylonian king Hammurabi, and the earliest legal code known in its entirety. See “Code of Hammurabi”, Microsoft Encarta Reference Library 2005. 1993-2004 Microsoft Corporation. [ 32 ]. See Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of Prison, trans. Alan Sheridan, (New York: A Division of random House, Inc., 1977), 3-5. [ 34 ]. Garry Gutting, Foucault; a very short introduction,(Oxford: Oxford University Press., 2005), 80. [ 38 ]. Garry Gutting, Foucault; a very short introduction, (Oxford: Oxford University Press., 2005), 80. [ 40 ]. Cf. Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of Prison, trans. Alan Sheridan, (New York: A Division of random House, Inc., 1977), 23.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Structuralism takes two basic ideas from Saussure’s work. First, a concern with the underlying relations of cultural text and practices – the grammar which makes meaning possible. Second, the view that meaning is always the result of the interplay of relationship of selection and combination made possible by the underlying structure.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Write an response in which you present and explain “Ways of Seeing” and “Panopticism” as examples of Berger’s and Foucault’s theories of power. Both Foucault and Berger are arguing against our usual understanding of power and knowledge and history. In this sense, what they are doing or, to use Foucault’s term, their “projects” are similar. Be sure, however, to look for differences as well as similarities.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gutting, G.,( 2008), “Michel Foucault”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2008 Edition), Edward N, Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/foucault/>.…

    • 1618 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Panopticism's Difficulty

    • 2937 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Foucault, Michel. “Panopticism.” Ways of Reading: An Anthology for Readers. 8th Ed. By: David Bartholomae and Anthony Petrosky. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2008. 209-236.…

    • 2937 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He studied with radical philosophers during his time as a student in school and later on began working as a Professor at the University of Toulouse in 1936. Canguilhem’s thinking inspired many other famous philosophers that are well known today, including Michel Foucault. Although he was obviously an important figure, he is not as well known as those he has inspired. Canguilhem wrote a book titled “The Normal and the Pathological.” This book is divided into two parts, the first debuted in 1966 and the second in 1978. Interestingly, there were major movements occuring during the 1960’s and late 1970’s in France. The structuralist movement came about during the 1960’s, which was an intellectual movement that many well known philosophers became apart of due to their similar beliefs that society is composed of complex systems, which all play an important role in creating the system and must be working together (Mastin, 2009). Therefore, in order for one to understand these systems, one must analyze the multiple parts. Structuralists went against the thinking of that time, and because of this, they were not very popular amongst those in their field. During the late 1970’s, France was in the process of transitioning into a era with new technologies being introduced and consumerism on the rise (Sheppe, 2010). Although France was never too found of Americas way of living, their…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: 7. Foucault , Michel. “The Meants of Correct Training” and “The Panopticism”in Paul Rabinowed. The Foucault Reader, New York: Pantheon, 1984. 188-213 Print.…

    • 2347 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lyotard, Jean-Francois. "Defining the Postmodern." Postmodernism. Ed. Lisa Appignanesi. London: Institute for Contemporary Art, 1986.…

    • 4022 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Foucault, Michel. "Panopticism." Ways of Reading. 8th ed. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martins, 2008. 207-37. Print.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    “The New Criticism.” Introduction. Twentieth-Century Literary Criticism. Ed. Linda Pavlovski. Vol. 146. Detroit: Gale, 2004. 1-2. Literature Criticism Online. Web. 29 Mar. 2013.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bibliography: Baudelaire, Charles, Les Fleurs Du Mal, Translated by Richard Howard, Boston, Ma, David R. Godine, Publisher, Inc., 1982.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For most of the reading, I was not entirely sure what Foucault was getting at. Foucault dropped hints here and there but more importantly, he intends to allow the reader to see for themselves. Foucault attempts to make the reader understand the relation between power, culture, and the individual.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Claire McCully Prof.ssa Samera Esmeir Rhetoric 103b 7 April 2015 Essay 2, Prompt 2: Foucault and Freud on the Autonomy of the Individual Both Foucault and Freud developed theories of the subject which describe individuals as influenced by repressive powers in their autonomy. Freud, in Civilization and its Discontents, represented the individual as restricted in their behaviors and pursuit of happiness by civilization, a faculty which had been developed to secure human happiness. Foucault credits the confession of sexuality to the repression of individuals in The History of Sexuality, especially from the 18th century onwards. Both theorists were uncomfortable with the liberal way which humans categorize one another, forming complete identities…

    • 3639 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Foucault on Authorship

    • 7562 Words
    • 31 Pages

    What Is an Author? Michel Foucault, 1969 The coming into being of the notion of "author" constitutes the privileged moment of individualization in the history of ideas, knowledge, literature, philosophy, and the sciences. Even today, when we reconstruct the history of a concept, literary genre, or school of philosophy, such categories seem relatively weak, secondary, and super imposed scansions in comparison with the solid and fundamental unit of the author and the work. I shall not offer here a sociohistorical analysis of the author's persona. Certainly, it would be worth examining how the author became individualized in a culture like ours, what status he has been given, at what moment studies of authenticity and attribution began, in what kind of system of valorization the author was involved, at what point we began to recount the lives of authors rather than of heroes, and how this fundamental category of "the-man-and-his-work criticism" began. For the moment, however, I want to deal solely with the relationship between text and author and with the manner in which the text points to this figure that, at least in appearance; is outside it and antecedes it. Beckett nicely formulates the theme with which I would like to begin: "What does it matter who is speaking;' someone said; 'what does it matter who is speaking.'" In this indifference appears one of the fundamental ethical principles of contemporary writing [écriture]. I say "ethical" because this indifference is really not a trait characterizing the manner in which one speaks and writes but, rather, a kind of immanent rule, taken up over and over again, never fully applied, not designating writing as something completed, but dominating it as a practice. Since it is too familiar to require a lengthy analysis, this immanent rule can be adequately illustrated here by tracing two of its major themes. First of all, we can say that today's writing has freed itself from the theme of expression. Referring only to…

    • 7562 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Foucault Panopticism

    • 1799 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Cited: Foucault, Michel. “Panopticism.” Ways of Reading, 9th Edition. Eds. David Bartholomae and Anthony Petroski. Boston: Bedford/St. Martins, 2011 282-309.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. An analysis of Levi-Straussian structuralism as an instantiation of the problems of thinking through the relationship between structure and centre. The basic point here comes at the end of the essay, and can be stated in one sentence Whereas Levi-Straussian structuralism posits itself as a decentring, it re-creates the centre in a particular way: as the loss of a centre. In other words, how one decentres matters; and there is, above all, a crucial difference between conceiving a structure as simply being acentric (of just not having a centre) and between conceiving of a structure as being acentric because it has lost a centre it once had. It is precisely these two forms of decentering…

    • 4163 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics