Preview

Foreign Politics: The Progressive Era

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
520 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Foreign Politics: The Progressive Era
The Progressive Era also belongs to the age of American imperialism, where the US gained control of many oversea territories and interfered heavily with foreign politics. Progressive presidents employed three different ways to handle foreign politics: Roosevelt employed the aggressive “big stick” diplomacy foreign policy; Taft focused on economic growth with “dollar diplomacy”; while Wilson followed the Monroe Doctrine and intervened in Latin America with “moral diplomacy”.

President Roosevelt utilized the foreign policy of “Big Stick” Diplomacy. This policy was made infamous by his quote: “Speak softly and carry and big stick; you will go far”. Roosevelt advocated for initial diplomatic negotiations, but in instances when the US doesn’t receive a favorable agreement, miltary threats would be liberally employed. When attempting to build a canal in Panama, then a province of Colombia, the US tried to negotiate with Colombia. However, after the US’ proposal was rejected, it encouraged Panaman settlers, who were generally unhappy with Colombian rules, to revolt. The US
…show more content…
The prominent example for this policy was the US’ intervention in Mexico. After Mexican peasants revolted against the Mexican government and established the Huerta government, the US refused to recognize the new regime since it was violent and nondemocratic. Consequently, the US government constantly seeked a way to intervene in Mexico, and finally declared war against the Huerta government after a small incident with US sailors. The Huerta government collapsed after this intervention, and a new US-approved government was established

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Our country had no problem intervening in foreign affairs a hundred years ago. Today, this seems to have not changed at all. Look at the war in Iraq – America intervened when some believe it was not our place. Someone from the Progressive Era could relate to this, however, today most realize when it is not America's place as a country to step in, while back during the Progressives most people did not think like this. Someone from the Progressive Era would be happy to see this tradition still carried on, making America seem dominating.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Woodrow Wilson (Harnessing the Power of Innovation in the Progressive Era par 2.). In World…

    • 3879 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roosevelt's Big Stick was based on the African saying speak softly and carry a big stick. Roosevelt's Corollary was an addition to the Monroe Doctrine, which basically told Europe to stay out of the Western Hemisphere. The corollary said that the U.S. would now use force to protect its economic interests in Latin America. It's goal was to keep things going well in Latin America as long as it benefited the U.S. Wilson's missionary diplomacy said that the United States had a moral responsibility to deny recognition to any Latin American government it viewed as oppressive, undemocratic, or hostile to U.S. interests. They were similar in that they both sought to keep things going well in Latin America, but while Roosevelt's corollary was enacted…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also, the Big Stick policy encouraged imperialism in surrounding countries. According to Hodge, the Big Stick diplomacy had ‘five central foundations’, which included(). In summary it meant that America had interest in the surrounding countries such as Venezuela and Panama. Meaning America had a position of authority and no threat from European countries like Britain and Spain, who known for their empire’s at the time. The most notable example of Teddy Roosevelt Big Stick diplomacy was in 1902 when Roosevelt threated Britain and Germany to send 54 war ships. If they did not allow Venezuela to accept international arbitration.[30] Ferguson concludes that around this time Britain recognised United States ‘as one of those rival empires enough to be worthy of appeasement’.[31] This is seen with America agreeing the Platt agreement in 1903, which gave the US the right to intervene in Cuba’s domestic and foreign affairs. [29] It meant that America could be a great power and that delegation that Roosevelt had influence within the Latin countries. It shows that imperialism is shown with the beliefs behind the Big Stick diplomacy. America were acting in South America to maintain their influence over the Latin countries on their…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During this period, progressivism was gradually rising from the local and state level to the national level. Increasing numbers of people across the nation supported expanding the role of the federal government to ensure the welfare of the people. Roosevelt felt that Taft was defying everything that they were for in government and decided to run agains't him. Roosevelt created the "Bull Moose" party. Although Roosevelt and Wilson were both progressives, they differed over the means and extent to which government should intervene or regulate the states and the economy. Differences between New Nationalism and New Freedom over trusts and the tariff became a central issue of the campaign. Roosevelt believed the federal government should act as a "trustee" for the American people, controlling and supervising the economy in the public interest. Wilson had greater reservations about a large federal government and sought a return to a more decentralized republic. Roosevelt and Wilson's national reforms made them successful during the progressive era. They were both successful progressive presidents.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the late 1800s and early 1900s, the United States was their relationships with other countries and not isolating themselves, foreign policies had to be developed in order to guide it’s interactions with the world. There were three policies of the late 19th century and early 20th century that were used as justification for intervention with Latin America. One foreign policy of the time was Roosevelt’s Big Stick Diplomacy, or more commonly known as the Roosevelt Corollary. “Walk softly, but carry a big stick” was the motto for the Roosevelt Corollary, which focused on justifying the United States interactions and military interventions with Latin America as the U.S. was the big brother of Latin America. In contrast, another foreign policy…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the Progressive Era,The United States faced many problems that needed to be addressed which were unfair business, poor working conditions and destruction of the environment. Presidents Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft and Woodrow Wilson worked to fix some of these problems. While all the Presidents worked to correct these problems during the Progressive Era, Woodrow Wilson was the most progressive president because he attacked big business’s, signed the act to create the national park service and supported for workers.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “World Leader,” Alan Dawley examined the correlation between Woodrow Wilson’s democracy and the progressives’ industrial democracy during World War I. For the first time, The United States emerged as the world’s creditor and a world power that dictated the outcome of a European War, and Woodrow Wilson became a global figure promoting peace and democracy.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roosevelt was a very intelligent man, his skills ranged from; negotiation, to naval strategy, to being a well written author, he orchestrated both foreign and national policies, and set up the nation for one of the most prosperous economic periods of our history. Roosevelt received a Nobel Piece Prize for his part in the Russo-Japanese war in year 1904-1905, and for the first time the award was controversial. The Norwegian Left argued that Roosevelt was a "military mad" imperialist who completed the American conquest of the Philippines. Swedish newspaper also wrote that Alfred Nobel was turning in his grave. Many believed Norway only gave Roosevelt the award as to make a powerful ally. Roosevelt was one of the era's most influential naval strategists, for decades he strove to improve the navy so that it would become the instrument that would turn the U.S. into a force to be reckoned with. When attending Harvard, Roosevelt wrote the book The Naval War of 1812. At the time he was only twenty-four. Roosevelt was very well known for his controversial "big stick" foreign policy which can best be described by a quote from Roosevelt himself; "Speak softly, and carry a big stick." The ideology behind the phrase was that when making peace negotiations that one should tread water carefully but should also be ale to back their threats if the need…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Woodrow Wilson's foreign policy was called aggressive moral diplomacy. According to Wilson himself, he initiated a foreign policy founded on moral principles rather than materialism and economic…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As chief diplomat, Theodore Roosevelt came up with the “Big Stick Policy”. A policy in which he used to explain his relations with domestic political leaders and his approach to certain issues. Theodore was very active with the Russo-Japanese war. During the war he expanded Japanese influence over Asia and negotiated the Russo-Japanese war, he won a Nobel Prize for his negotiations in the war. One of, what Theodore himself considers, his greatest achievements was his creation of the Panama canal. He created the canal as a way to ship goods quickly and cheaply through Atlantic and pacific…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Big Stick Abroad Analysis

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To get involved or not to get involved in global politics? That was not a question that Theodre Roosevelt ever had. Global politics were at the forefront of his mission as President. Within a year of Roosevelt becoming President he had interceded with Latin American affairs. I believe this was because Roosevelt felt that the problem threatened his visions for the United States. Roosevelt put the United States in the middle of Germany and Venezuela to help collect a debt that Venezuela owed Germany. He did the same thing to Heidi for Europe. By 1904 Roosevelt had made America the financial protector over the Dominican Republic. Roosevelt was impartial to English speaking Countries. In 1902 Roosevelt…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1898, the United States became a colonial power, in accordance with the Monroe Doctrine, to defend America’s traditional posture. Following the victory of the Spanish-American War, the United States established numerous colonies to serve as foreign bases. Unlike the previous era of continental expansion, the Progressive era sought to improve the lives of foreign societies through American Imperialism. The radical shift away from Jacksonian foreign policy was the result of the United States proactively committing itself to the global pursuit of liberty, justice, and democracy. Traditionally, Jacksonians would oppose foreign idealism and imperialism in favor for domestic policy.…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    T.R.’s political views are very interesting. Hendricks writes that “speaking softly but wielding a big stick Theodore Roosevelt orchestrated the independence of Panama and gained us right to build the canal.”¹. He does this many times throughout his time in office, as well as when he was the assistant secretary of the Navy. For example as when Cuba did not want to comply with his treaty, the Venezuelan crisis when Great Britain Italy and Germany wanted to embargo Venezuela, the changes that he made to the American foreign policy, and when he almost sent the U.S. into war with Spain when he was Assistant Secretary of the Navy.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    United States foreign policy has always been characterized by a commitment to free trade, protection of American interests, and a concern for human rights. Our founding fathers, specifically George Washington, are responsible for much of the influence regarding foreign policy after their time period and up to the present day. Washington, in his Farewell Address, warned the country to stay out of permanent foreign entanglements and to stay neutral. The United States stayed faithful to Washington’s warnings for about 125 years. But, when the age of Imperialism hit, the country was forced to intervene to prevent other countries from rising up and becoming world powers. The atrocities of imperialism caused something that America will always regret; The First World War. After the war, the United States’ foreign policy changed from all out intervention to almost complete isolation, similar to what George Washington suggested. After the Second World War, American foreign policy back once again to intervention to try and make the world a better and more peaceful place. In comparison, each foreign policy have nearly no similarities, but a wealth of differences.…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays