Preview

Flag Burning & Freedom of Speech

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
679 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Flag Burning & Freedom of Speech
Flag Burning & Freedom of Speech

Jonathan Cunningham

International Academy of Design & Technology Online

Since the Supreme Court has decided that freedom of speech may at times be restricted, the question arises, should such freedom be restricted when it comes to flag burning? An example of such an action would be an angry mob of people who wish to protest a recent decision by the government by burning the flag. Some people state that the government should ban this form of protest. Others staunchly insist this form of expression should not be outlawed. This freedom should not be restricted.

Matt Nagin (2012), a writer for the online news platform policymic, states that “opponents of flag burning speak about it as if the protesters were destroying the national character and/or desecrating the one and only Mona Lisa”. Many citizens quite understandably take offense at the thought or mention of burning the flag. This may at times be especially true with individuals who have served in the military, or their family members; since they can personally attest to the cost of defending freedom or the safety of a nation, flag burning can be especially hurtful or offensive.

In spite of this, the freedom to protest via burning of the flag is protected by law. The most recent occurrence of when the Supreme Court had to re-establish this was in 1989, in the case of Texas vs. Johnson. According to an article posted online by a website known as the Law Library, Gregory Lee Johnson had been convicted of “desecrating a venerated object in violation of Texas Penal Code section 42.09(a) (3)”. He had been given a fine of two thousand dollars and a sentence of a year in prison. Fortunately, his conviction was reversed by the Supreme Court. That same article went on to say, “The Free Speech Clause, the court ruled, forbids the government from establishing an orthodox symbol of national unity that is insulated from public criticism, symbolic or otherwise”.

So


References: Nagin, Matt. (2012, October). Flag Burning is a Freedom That We Must Respect. policymic. Retrieved from http://www.policymic.com/articles/15574/flag-burning-is-a-freedom-that-we-must-respect Law Library - American Law and Legal Information. (2012). Texas v. Johnson. Retrieved from the online Law Library <ahref="http://law.jrank.org/pages/10758/Texas-v-Johnson.html">Texas v. Johnson</a> Upshaw, Ed Earl. (October, 2012). Discussion of “Flag Burning is a Freedom That We Must Respect” article. [Flag burning in a public protest is a deliberate attempt to provoke a reaction…When it is successful, why hold the provoked person responsible...The 1st Amendment guarantees freedom of speech, but it doesn 't guarantee freedom from foreseeable consequences]. Retrieved from: http://www.policymic.com/articles/15574/flag-burning-is-a-freedom-that-we-must-respect
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Texas V. Johnson Case Brief
    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Texas V. Johnson Case Brief

    The State court of Appeals affirmed that Johnson was in the wrong, however, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Burning The American Flag
    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Burning The American Flag

    The battle in the courts of people desecrating the American flag, goes back to 1907. Showing disrespect toward our Nation's flag is intolerable. People have freedom of speech, but do not need to show their opinion through burning the American flag. Burning the flag is offensive to many U.S citizens and is disrespectful to our nation because the American flag is a symbol of freedom.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Burning The American Flag
    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of Burning The American Flag

    The article talks about how the Supreme Court based a law by a 5-to-4 that a person can show their disagreement with the governmental policies by burning the American flag. It gives a vivid example of the other side of the law in china where people who peacefully express disagreement with the government policies may be slaughtered. Allen goes on to talk about how American flag is a cherished symbol of our nation. Allen also talks about how this is technically abiding by the First Amendment, It is the freedom of the people to express there freedom of expression of speech. He thinks that it is just an ironic situation because of the fundamental commitment to freedom.…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Texas V. Johnson
    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Texas V. Johnson

    In 1984, following a protest march through the streets of Dallas, Texas against the policies of the Reagan Administration, Gregory Lee Johnson was handed an American flag. Outside the Dallas City Hall, Johnson through the flag onto the ground, poured kerosene on it, and set fire to it. Many protesters around Johnson began a chant of, "America, the red, white, and blue, we spit on you!" While many protesters agreed with what Johnson had done, there were several others who felt extremely offended. In fact, one such person felt the need to gather the remains of the flag which he then buried in his yard. The protest was a nonviolent one and no one standing nearby was hurt or threatened.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Is Flag-Burning Constitutionally Protected?
    • 2295 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Is Flag-Burning Constitutionally Protected?

    The United States is well-known for its principles of freedom and democracy, which is demonstrated through the First Amendment’s Free Speech Clause. Thus, American citizens can openly discuss political matters; criticize the President and his Cabinet on television, radio talk show or in the newspaper; or publicly protest against the government tax policy. However, Free Speech protection becomes debatable when some American citizens burn the nation’s flag to express their disagreement to the government. The act of burning the American Flag should be constitutionally protected under the First Amendment’s Free Speech Clause because the act is a symbolic expression that communicates an individual’s idea or opinion about his nation; and that the First Amendment’s Free Speech Clause covers and protects symbolic expression.…

    • 2295 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Burning a Nation's Flag: Hate Crime
    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Burning a Nation's Flag: Hate Crime

    In contrast to what a hate crime is, an act of free speech, protected by the First Amendment, is the right to express any opinions without censorship or restraint. An act of free speech does not necessarily mean saying something out loud. It could also mean expressing your opinions about something by using actions. Since burning a nation's flag suggests taking a stand against a political activity, it is a way of expressing your opinion. Similar to free speech, freedom of expression…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Texas V Johnson
    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Texas V Johnson

    The first amendment grants the citizens of the United States the right to speak freely, without legal persecution. Over the past 200 years since this amendment was enacted there have been hundreds of judicial cases devoted to interpreting and refining this law. One such case, reviewed by the United States ' supreme court in 1988, was Texas v Johnson. The case involved Johnson 's conviction of desecrating a venerated object (a Texas Statute) by burning a U.S. flag (Texas V Johnson(1989)). The importance of this case rests not only in the legality of flag burning, but also in the definition of speech. This was the primary concern of the supreme court when reviewing Texas v Johnson. Does the first amendment only pertain to spoken and written words, or can it be construed to protect other forms of expression?…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Flag Burning - a Persuasive Essay
    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Flag Burning - a Persuasive Essay

    The First Amendment protects our speech and forms of expression and it is considered one of the most important Amendments. Flag burning is considered, as far as the Supreme Court is concerned, as a form of expression. No matter how offensive it may be, people can freely burn a flag to express their emotions and to permit otherwise would be a “suppression of speech” (Apel). Ironically, on the same terms, the First Amendment can bring punishment. The “knowing desecration [of the American flag] for the purpose of creating a breach of peace of creating immediate danger” (Flag Burning) is liable to be punished. Bad intentions ruffle the government’s feathers and bring up red flags for national security, but public display of your opinions is acceptable.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Flag Burning
    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Flag Burning

    Many people are offended by the act of publicly burning an American flag and feel it should be outlawed based on the fact that it is offensive to the citizens of this country. Although this may be true, people still have the right to protest. This was upheld in a Supreme Court case Texas v. Johnson, where the defendant Mr. Johnson was arrested for publicly burning a flag outside the Republican National Convention in Dallas, Texas. After being arrested Mr. Johnson was convicted of setting fire to a flag during a protest and chanting with other protesters; "America, the red, white, and blue, we spit on you"(Texas v. Johnson). He appealed his claim to the Texas Supreme Court of Appeals where they overturned the conviction based on the fact that he was exercising his first amendment right. One of the Supreme Court justices went on to say, "If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that the government may not…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Derek Bok Protecting Freedom Of Expression On The Campus Summary
    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page

    Derek Bok Protecting Freedom Of Expression On The Campus Summary

    In Derek Bok’s article “Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus,” he states that while some free speech is degrading or offensive, it is still our First Amendment right to say what we want (31-33). Bok brings up the example of two student from Harvard University who hung up a confederate flag. Some people believed that this action was demeaning, since often times the confederacy is equated with slavery. Students of the campus fought to have the symbol taken down. Bok agrees that the way in which the students handled themselves was uncalled for, but at the same time stated that it was their right to display this kind of symbol. Bok believes that deciding what qualifies as free speech, and what doesn’t, is an impossible question to answer.…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Case Analysis Texas V. Johnson
    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Case Analysis Texas V. Johnson

    Cline, A. (2011) Can Flag Burning Send a Political Message Be Made a Crime? Retrieved…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Banning The Confederate Flag Essay
    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Banning The Confederate Flag Essay

    The first amendment clearly states that congress shall not make any law abridging the freedom of speech. If our government isn’t going to avid by the amendments, then why have them? If they are going to ban the confederate flag then they should be banned for not corresponding with our god given rights. The constitutional amendments are what our government is supposed to stick to.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Beauregard Confederate Battle Flag
    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Beauregard Confederate Battle Flag

    Wanting to keep the flag around for heritage reasons in museums and places that preserve past flags is completely okay. Whenever it comes to wearing the flag or flying it on important buildings under the American flag is where it becomes inappropriate. Coski (2005) states that in the 1980s the NAACP tried to rally or annul the use of the Confederate Beauregard Battle Flag in states and emblems. Coski shares my current opinion that Southern states should not banish the Beauregard Battle Flag but yet try to understand that its role and meaning are different for different groups of people. The flag should just be retired to museums.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analysis Of 'American Flag Stands For Tolerance'
    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analysis Of 'American Flag Stands For Tolerance'

    Passage 1, "American Flag Stands for Tolerance," asserts direct ways that rights, freedom, and choices can be snatched. In the article it is stated that "each individual is to have the freedom to develop by his or her own lights, and not by the command of officialdom." Individuals should be able to live how they intent to instead of having the government decide how they should live. Furthermore why can people not stand up for their rights when "the flag stands for free expression of ideas, no matter how distastful?" People do not want other people interfering with how they want to live their lives. Having freedom snatched away can cause many individuals to do wrong things, such as burning the flag.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gregory Lee Johnson Civil Rights Movement
    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gregory Lee Johnson Civil Rights Movement

    Gregory Lee Johnson’s act of burning the American flag was not verbal communication.The United States Supreme Court ruled it as expressive conduct allowing it as the 1st amendment. In the case of Texas vs. Johnson, the United States Supreme Court leaned on Gregory Lee Johnson’s side, stating that this was an act of the first amendment under the United States Constitution. Gregory Lee Johnson’s charges and fines were dropped. The court case, Texas vs. Johnson closed on June 21, 1989. Shortly after the case of Texas vs. Johnson the United States Congress passed the, Flag Protection Act of 1989. The Flag Protection Act of 1989 rules that the government's interest in preserving the flag as a United States symbol is not more significant than the individual's First Amendment right to disrespect the American flag through expressive…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics