Preview

First Philippic Against Marcus

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2721 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
First Philippic Against Marcus
In Cicero’s, “First Philippic against Marcus Antonius,” he is offering his view on the political situation after the death of Caesar. His purpose for coming before the Senate is to drive them to the realization that Marcus Antonius and his actions are slowly breaking down the unity of the country. He praises Marcus Antonius for his fine speech, intentions, and promises, then points out the fallacies and unconstitutionality of Marcus Antonius’ actions. He reminds the Senators that “Nothing was done any longer through the Senate…” because measures were being passed without declaration or consent. The Senate and Caesar’s advisors are Cicero’s audience even though the end of the speech is directed towards Marcus Antonius and Dolabella who are not present. Cicero describes his motives of leaving and coming back, Rome’s problems, the need for Caesar’s laws, and the contingency of some of Marcus Antonius’ laws, making the reader think that he is trying to sway the Senate into rebelling against Marcus Antonius yet at the same time he praises and congratulates the good deeds done by him. Even at the end, he addresses Marcus Antonius who is not even present, acclaiming and chastising. Why does he do this? Cicero makes a valiant, determined attempt to convince the Senate to join powers with him against Marcus Antonius yet at the same time, does he have doubts or fears about speaking against Antonius otherwise why would he be so propitious in his approach? Cicero starts the speech with a direct address towards the Senators. This establishes who his audience is. Throughout the speech his tone is one of persuasion. His first goal, in giving this speech, is to persuade the Senators that his view and opinions are legitimate by proving his credibility. He shows his concern for justice by stressing what he has done to serve the country and giving a testimony of devotion. “I made no

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In his second monologue, Cassius focuses on pathos and logos in order to appeal to his audience, Brutus, directly. Cassius smartly avoids further development of ethos in this monologue to make sure Brutus doesn’t think this is all personal for Cassius and deter him from the conspiracy. Therefore, as mentioned before, Cassius’ intent for his second monologue is to appeal to Brutus. He wants to raise Brutus to the same level as Caesar and make him see that he is just as important in I.ii.9-15. This makes Brutus feel good about himself, and successfully makes Cassius’ arguments against Caesar more personal to Brutus and slowly pulls him into the conspiracy. Cassius could’ve used anyone’s name in his explanation that the name is equal to Caesar, but the fact that he used Brutus’ name made his pathos much stronger and directed at the audience for greater persuasion. This is where Cassius strongly considers his audience and knows that by implementing them into the argument he will have a higher chance at success. When Cassius then shifts into appeal to logos, he explains that Caesar, one man, is taking up all the fame and glory of Rome when there is room for much more than just one single, not even god-like man (I.ii.18-25). He explains once again just like he did in the concluding sentence of his first paragraph that it does not make sense that one man receive all the power and “bear the palm alone” (I.ii.43) He dives into the values of his audience and the people of that time who valued democracy, equality and even a divvied up triumvirate of three leaders who ruled Rome simultaneously in a checks and balances sort of way to avoid absolute leadership like the one Caesar is holding. Brutus of course would agree that, yes, why should a single man rule when the people or Rome and its government is based on a triumvirate with democratic…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the emergence of the Roman Republic, the Senate, consisting of the patricians of the society, became “the governing body and the only body where debate was possible”. To debate properly in the Senate, “one had to know the persuasive art of rhetoric and oratory, or public speaking”. Cicero and Quintilian, both men of political influence in the Roman Republic, were well known as “quintessential figures of Roman rhetoric”, and they both used this art to promote the power of a leader and to gain…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A notable difference between the original and Ted Cruz’ speech would be the places where instead of simply saying “men” Ted Cruz says “men and women” since in modern times women can vote and are an influential part of society. There are also small section within Ted’s speech that were not in the translation of Cicero’s speech, the more notable one starting with “dictates by” and ending with “he ignores”, though the exact beginning and end of this original part can be debated. Within that section Ted Cruz expresses his belief that common folk nowadays are all talk and no smack, folk that “do not take part in public deliberations” nor “come into the senate”. Of course Ted made some obvious changes as well, such as changing the Paletine Hill to “the border” and O Catiline to “President Obama”, and not only did he change those names, Ted removed a whole section where Cicero mentioned specific people putting others to death and implying that Catiline should be killed. This section was removed either because of the implication of the want of executing Obama, or due to Ted Cruz being a ddungbo and not wanting to decide which person he knows should play the part of P. Scipio and which should play Pontifex.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decuis Vs Calphurnia Essay

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To begin, he claims it is all “amiss interpreted” this detail refutes all that she has said because it dismisses every point she made right away. He first uses the word choice “fair”,the word fair has many definitions, and one of them is a synonym for beauty this expresses that his future will be beautiful. He reinforces the positives he tells Caesar he utilizes the word “fortunate” he does this to give the omens a better connotation and illustrate future success. Instead of them representing the death of Caesar they represent the downfall of the enemies of Rome. He also inputs the detail of “smiling romans” revealing that he’ll bring joy and success to his people and that they adore him, so no harm would come to him at this meeting. Decius later mentions the detail “great Rome” meaning Caesar will bring greatness to his kingdom and his people. He also uses personification when he talks of “reviving blood” illustrating the new life he’ll give to everyone in Rome. Finally, he uses parallelism when he says “great Rome… great men” showing that if he pursues this he will not only make Rome great but also the men…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Midterm 3 History

    • 8039 Words
    • 33 Pages

    o Cicero was supporting the senate and Pompey and was in Rome stirring up trouble for the first Triumvirate by speaking out of ending Caesar’s Gallic command to prosecute him for his injustices during consulship.…

    • 8039 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Antony said he would not speak poorly about any of the conspirators, but he found away around it by using repetition (III,ii,84-96). He would question the characteristics of Caesar given from the conspirators to the people. Once he started to get the plebeians to think, he decides to show Julius’s stab wounds through his cloak. Antony tells them how he remembers the first time Caesar wore that cloak. Now, as he tells the story behind it, he has the people’s pity. With the people’s pity, they will beg to hear anything else about the great Caesar. Antony states that he has Caesar’s will with all the items Caesar gave to the great people, but he does not feel it is right to share the words written. The commoners beg until they hear it. Antony can now explain how the conspirators made even more of a mistake (III,ii,241-244;249-254).…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cassius is able to assess his audience and use that to his advantage. In this case, his audience is Brutus, a thoughtful if slightly oblivious patrician and friend of Caesar’s. Brutus has a strong love for Rome,…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The fact is, we showed the courage of men, the prudence of children. The tree was felled, but not cut up by the roots. Accordingly, you see how it is sprouting up.”[11] Cicero here is referring to the tree of tyranny, a tree that will blot out the sun and slowly choke the smaller plants in the garden as they slowly wilt away, starved from the sunlight. Ultimately, there was nothing Cicero could do to save the Senate, he was only one honest man surrounded by liars and thieves. At that point in Rome’s history her government had effectively become a cleptocracy, with each politician trading favors in the hopes of strengthening their own position. That sort of government is not…

    • 2226 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Antony's speech, he talks about the bad things that Caesar has done and how Brutus was ambitious. It says, "The noble Brutus hath told you Caesar was ambitious. If it were so, it was grievous fault, and grievously hath Caesar answered it." (III.ii.75-78) Which is a logo because it is a logic on how Caesar and Brutus are both ambitious. It also says, "But Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man. He hath brought many captives home to Rome whose ransoms did the general coffers fill." (III.ii.84-87) Which means that Brutus is an straightforward man by reason of him brought captives home. Antony is speaking satisfactory about Brutus so the people would listen to Antony more effectively because of the nice things he is saying.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Brutus's speech, he begins by addressing the crowd as "Romans, countrymen, and lovers,” demonstrating that he is one of them and that he values their role in the Roman community. This helps establish ethos (credibility), and as Brutus continues by arguing that he killed Caesar to protect all citizens from Caesar's ambition…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As with any personal letter, it shows Cicero’s personal and emotional side as he writes to friends and even his son. Some of the manuscripts are as carefully written and executed as some of Cicero’s orations and because of this, they are just as valuable. As a philosopher, Cicero’s letters are important because they show what ultimately was going on in this man’s mind. His ideas and thoughts that prevailed in many of his more developed speeches, yet with a more personal note.…

    • 1968 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony loved Caesar and was completely against his murder, so he used rhetorical strategies to persuade the Romans to be against the perpetrators. For example when Antony says “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” he is using the mix of sarcasm and logos. Antony repeats this same thing over and over again until the Romans start questioning if Brutus truly is an honorable man. His sarcasm and repetition were both great rhetorical tactics that were used to manipulate and confuse the Roman’s minds. Antony brings together the perfect amount of ethos and pathos when he states, “ ‘Tis his will. Let but the commons hear this testament- which pardon me, I do not mean to read- And they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds And dip their napkins in his sacred blood,” (III,ii,127-132). This is essential because it shows that Antony is credible and trustworthy because he has Caesar’s will. This also appeals to the people’s emotions because they become saddened over Caesar’s death. Antony used his tactics to make the Romans trust him and his views, which led to them rioting against the perpetrators. His use of ethos, pathos, and logos convinced the people that the assassination of Caesar was a cruel act and that Brutus, Cassius, and the other perpetrators are…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before his speech begins, the whole crowd is going wild with overwhelming support for Brutus. Knowing this, Antony is quickly able to capture the attention of the people by saying, “For Brutus’ sake, I am beholding to you” (64). By starting off with saying that Brutus endorses whatever Antony is able to say, they are suddenly more curious to hear what he say and what exactly their beloved Brutus approves of. By saying this, Antony is able to borrow Brutus’ honest reputation and use it as his own. Towards the end of his speech, Antony borrows Caesar’s renewed ethos, once again merging voices and giving Antony even more credibility. He asks the audience, “Wherein hath Caesar thus deserved your love?” (234). Antony successfully borrows Caesar’s great reputation and increases his credibility for the people to trust him.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The speeches given to the Roman citizens by Brutus and Antony are the most predominate and important aspects of the play, because they each manipulated their words and incorporated the use of rhetorical devices and the three classical appeals, (ethos, pathos, and logos) in such a way that each speech dramatically affected who the crowd favored.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Brutus comes out to confront the crowd, he addresses his speech to everyone, " Romans, countrymen, and lovers, hear me for my cause, and be silent, that you may hear."(298) When he starts his speech, and is presenting it to the people of Rome, he sounds believable, and trustworthy. He tells of that, " Not that I lov'd Caesar less, but that I lov'd Rome more."(298) He wants the People of Rome to know that, if this were not to happen to Caesar, "then you all will live like slaves."(298) Caesar was ambitious and that is why he must be killed. Since he is dead you all can be freemen, Free to live your lives without Caesar, but under the control of a new leader.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays