Preview

First Bankers Trust Services, Inc.: Settlement Agreement Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1162 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
First Bankers Trust Services, Inc.: Settlement Agreement Analysis
On September 21, 2017, First Bankers Trust Services, Inc. entered into a settlement agreement with the Department of Labor regarding it’s handling of the purchase of Maran, Inc. by the Maran, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan, for which First Bank was the trustee. While the settlement agreement is similar in many respects to the agreement that GreatBanc Trust Company entered into in 2014 with the DOL with respect to its handling of the purchase of Sierra Aluminum Company stock by the Employee Stock Ownership Plan sponsored by Sierra, it includes some material additions.

Since this is the first valuation season following the First Bankers settlement, we believe now is a good time to remind ESOP companies of the items their plan trustees will need to consider as part of that process. While the settlement agreements technically only apply to First Bankers and GreatBanc, and arose in a litigation context, they are being incorporated into the ongoing fiduciary responsibility of trustees more generally. Thus it’s reasonable to expect that most ESOP
…show more content…
Selection and Use of Valuation Advisor – General. This section describes the steps the ESOP trustee must take in order to have acted prudently in selecting the valuation advisor. In addition to the steps previously required under the GreatBanc settlement, the First Bankers settlement requires that a trustee document what steps it took to determine that the valuation advisor has received complete, accurate, and current information and to ensure the trustee understood the advice of the valuation advisor.

B. Selection of Valuation Advisor – Conflicts of Interest. The ESOP trustee must ensure that the valuation advisor has not done work for the ESOP sponsor or any other party involved in the transaction (other than the ESOP and its trustee). The First Bankers settlement species that this includes any committee of employees of the plan

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Brandon Apparel Group, Inc. (“Brandon”) was involved in the business of manufacturing and sales of casual apparel as well as licensed other companies to manufacture, distribute and sell its clothing lines. Additionally, Brandon had licensing agreements with several colleges, universities, and sports organizations, such as the National Football League.…

    • 2258 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Countrywide Financial

    • 3004 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Countrywide Financial was a mortgage-banking firm. They had one of the largest market shares in the early 2000s, when the mortgage market was booming. “No company pursued growth in home loans more aggressively than Countrywide” (NY Times 12/10). They were the leader of their industry, with 500 billion in home loans, 62,000 employees, 900 offices, and $200 billion in assets. Everything had been going well for the company and its employees, until the mortgage crisis began to unfold at the end of 2006. In June 2009, the SEC filed a civil suit against the founder of the business and some of his top management for fraud and insider trading. This came at the height of the mortgage crisis in the US. The founder of Countrywide, Angelo Mozilo, finally agreed to pay $45million in profits and $22.5 million in civil penalties, in which he still admits no wrongdoing.…

    • 3004 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief No 1

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Facts: In year 2000, Narnia Investments, Ltd. sued Harvestons Securities, Inc. and several defendants in trial court of Texas. The trial court then granted a default judgment against Harvestons and in favor of Narnia that Harvestons has to pay $365,000, plus attorney’s fees, prejudgment interest, and postjudgment interest. Harvestons claimed that it had no actual knowledge of the pending litigation before November 15, 2004 and filed a timely restricted appeal. Harvestons contends that the service of process was defective due to the process was delivered to someone different than the one name in the citation, the person to which the process was delivered, JoAnn Kocerek, did not have a authority to accept the process on behalf of Harvestons or the Texas Securities Commissioner and the return of service does not show a valid manner of service. At last, the appellate court of Texas reverse the trial court’s default judgment and remand this case for further proceedings.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hopson, J. F., & Hopson, P. D. (2014). Making the Right Choice of Business Entity. CPA Journal, 84(10), 43-44.…

    • 988 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Inside the Meltdown

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The stock of a global investment company, Bear Stearns, began to drop drastically on March 10th, 2008. A share of Bear Stearns was as high as $171 and by the afternoon dropped to $57. Former CEO of the company, Ace Greenberg, tells CNBC that all of these rumors are “ridiculous.” As time goes on, Bear Stearns’ cash reserves were disappearing and people invested in the company were immediately withdrawing. Bear Stearns was basically racing to find a company to buy them out or they would go under. Current CEO of Bear Stearns, Alan Schwartz, got ahold of JP Morgan’s CEO, Jamie Dimon, to buy out Bear. A ton of government officials come to Bear to look over their records and it is not a pretty sight. Bear was deep in toxic assets. The Federal Reserve was prohibited from lending any money to Bear so they used JP Morgan to bail out Bear Stearns. Unfortunately the company could not be saved and Bear Stearns was gone after being sold to JP Morgan at $2 per share.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    [University of Phoenix e-book Collection] Mason, OH: Thomson, Retrieved December 2, 2009 from University of Phoenix, LAW531-Business Law course…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This essay will explain the following four questions. First, would registration with the SEC be required for Dakota Gasworks securities? Second, Did Emerson violate Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5? Third what theory or theories might a court use to hold Wallace liable for insider trading? Finally, under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, who would be required to certify the accuracy of financial statements filed with the SEC?…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

    • 4123 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Policy Paper on the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Randy Ibrahim [SID: 860866350] Business 102 December 09, 2010 Dr. Sean D. Jasso…

    • 4123 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 11, 1998, United States Amoco Corporation (Amoco) and The British Petroleum Company p.l.c. (BPC) announced the BPC merger with Amoco. With a combined number of participants of 40,000 and $7 billion investment assets under management, the merged pension and savings plan of the new company is viewed by both management and employees as a bellwether of the success of the merger. Therefore, the new investment team must be able to “harmonize” the very different two original plans.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Answer: The parties to do or not do a specific thing must base it on a mutual agreement. Parties who are competent to enter into a contract that will be enforceable against both parties must make it. The promise or obligation of each party must be supported by consideration. It must de for a lawful purpose the contract must not be illegal such as the unauthorized buying and selling of narcotics. The contract must meet certain formal requirements such as being in writing or under seal.…

    • 2514 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    FI 311 Syllabus

    • 2684 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Course Packet: Elizabeth Booth, Financial Management: FI 311, McGraw Hill, Inc., 32nd edition, 2013. This course packet will serve in lieu of a textbook. It is imperative that you…

    • 2684 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    SARBANES OXLEY ACT 2002

    • 1374 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gilmore, H. (2013, April 24). After 10 Years, Sarbanes-Oxley Might Be Statutory Overkill. BePress: Selected Works.…

    • 1374 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Wells Fargo Merger

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Legal and financial effects of the merger. In recent years, Wells Fargo and its subsidiaries have had a plethora of legal issues. These issues grew for the first three years after the merger.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This annual publication, like the ones before it, was edited by Robert Stephenson, a partner in our Business Law Group in Toronto, who passed away on February 12, 2012. Robert’s law practice spanned almost 35 years, all with our firm. In addition to carrying on a general corporate and commercial law practice, Robert had extensive experience in corporate lending and secured transactions, acting for both lenders and borrowers. He acted…

    • 4585 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Rump Organization

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Rump Organization, a SEC registrant, is planning a corporate restructuring plan. On December 27, 2005 Ronald Rump, the CEO of the organization, along with the Board of Directors approved a plan to involuntarily terminate 100 of the organization’s employees. There is an option for each of the employees to sign a litigation waiver, which forfeits any right they have for legal action against Rump. In exchange for their voluntary signing of the waiver, Rump will offer each employee a lump-sum cash payment equivalent to one month’s salary. If they refuse to sign the waiver they will not receive any severance benefits. The employees in question will not be able to retain their job regardless of whether the waiver is or is not signed. There are a few additional facts presented along with the case:…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays