Preview

Feudalism In Japan And Europe Similarities

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
363 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Feudalism In Japan And Europe Similarities
Feudalism was a social system present in early Japanese and European times. The people were separated into different classes depending on their birth, wealth, and other factors. Feudalism in Europe and Japan were alike and different in many ways.
One way that feudalism in Japan and Europe were alike was that the soldiers/warriors in both cultures had a code of honor that they followed. The samurai’s (Japanese warriors) code of honour was called bushido. In bushido a true samurai would be “loyal, courageous, veracious (truthful), compassionate, and honorable”. In the Code of Chivalry knights were expected to be “brave, courteous, honourable, and gallant to women”. Both are alike in that the soldiers believe in being brave and honourable. The
…show more content…
Japan had a shogun and Europe had a king. The shogun was the person who was in charge and made most of the decisions just like a king in Europe did. The daimyo in Japan were like the nobles in Europe. The “shogun ruled the land through the daimyo and the king ruled the land through the nobles”.
Although they were similar in many ways they were also different. One way feudalism in Japan was different than Medieval Europe was that Japan had a figurehead and Europe did not. The emperors were the highest class in Japan, similar to a king in Europe, but unlike a king the emperors had no real power and were just a figurehead. Feudalism was different in Japan and Europe since Japan had a figurehead and Europe did not, In early Japan and Medieval Europe, feudalism was the social system they used. In Japanese and European feudalism the soldiers both had a Code of Honor and the structure of their social classes were similar, but Japan had a emperor who had no real power while Europe had a ruler who had some control. However, there were more ways that feudalism between the two were alike than they were

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    During the Tokugawa period of Japan a singular map consisted of numerous feudal towns and villages each ruled by individual daimyo lords. The list of individual domains was enormous, so too was the list of cultures, traditions, and material goods specific to the domains and feudal families that lived within the domain’s borders. The right to govern each domain was given to a daimyo lord by the Tokugawa Shogunate; in return, each ruling vassal was required to complete a “form of feudal service.” Known as alternate attendance the Shogun imposed this requirement as a means of political and economic control which restricted individual daimyo rule and reinforced the overall power of the Shogunate. While alternate attendance was a mechanism of political control that promoted peace throughout Japan, Constantine Nomikos Vaporis illustrated the unintentional effects of the hegemon’s policy in Tour of Duty. Vaporis argued that alternate attendance, while considered a “disciplinary institution” by other Japanese scholars, was nevertheless “instrumental in producing a population with a high level of shared culture and experience.”…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Two dominant families fought each other, and Minamoto won. Yoritomo, the leader, declared himself shogun and set up a military government in Kamakura. They basically controlled japan, because they appointed vassals as regional governors and stewards who pledged their loyalty. Then conflict raged between vassal warlords, shoguns, and the vassals loyal to him. By 1300 Ashikaga shogun controlled ¼ japan, the sumarai and vassals were jelouse, and went to gain own domain to create new types of daimyo. They set up mini independent kingdoms and improved land. By the 1500s all of their power weakend by fighting and the tokugawa took about 200 under control. The daimyos now served as vassals for shogun and pledged loyalty and military services in return.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Feudal Japan Failure

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Feudal Japan was not a very successful civilization due to the choice of feudalism. Feudal Japan has succeeded, failed, and had a rather small evolution period. Japan had succeeded in ways of battle, environmental adaptations, literature, and other influences. Japan also failed greatly in governing. Japan had made good changes during and after the feudalist period especially the governmental changes. This feudalist period of Japan started in about 1185 starting with many changes and successes. The middle of the civilization showed the most failures overwhelming the successes. The ending of the civilization was the start of evolution. Therefore, Feudal Japan had small successes but was overall a failing civilization.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To compare the ranks they are very similar I.E the merchants in feudal japan were similar to those of the European one (Serfs/Peseants). Feudal Japanese and European societies were built on a system of hereditary classes. The nobles were at the top, followed by the warriors, with tenant farmers or serfs below them, there was very little social mobility. Between the classes.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first reason why I think the similarities are greater than differences is social position. The reason why I think social position is because; “The life of a samurai was not his own but belonged entirely to his lord, and it was the duty of a (samurai) to consider this at all times….”. [Doc B]This…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine yourself as a Samurai, you are in the middle of defeating the European knights who are covered in plated armor. You begin to worry but then, you win, these are the reasons why a Samurai is better than a knight. Feudalism in Europe and Japan were both very similar. They both has rulers, and they both had rulers who hired nobles, and they both had nobles who hired landowners, and they both had landowners who hired warriors to protect the slaves and their land. If samurai and knights were to have fought against each other the samurai would have won because, they had movable armor and it was easier for them to dodge anything that a knight would slowly lunge at them with. If a Samurai and knights battled the knights would have fallen because, their armor was very defective. A knight's armor wasn’t made for easy movement, this made it more difficult for them to fight, but overall they were well protected(Document B). Their armor did defend them but, a Knight’s armor could easily be penetrated by a soldier…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the arrival of the Tokugawa shoguns, came a more centralized government. While the shoguns allowed the daimyo to rule their local areas, the shoguns still had complete control over the daimyo. This meant that the authority of the shogun extended from lord to peasant.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Since the development of the first civilizations, people have been divided into groups and categories. Some civilizations are divided according to gender and age, others according to field of work, and still others by social class or standing. Several provided documents offer differing evidence, opinions, and points of views regarding feudalism, one of the many systems developed by civilizations to organize and control their populations. Feudalism is the political, military, and social system that was established during the Middle Ages. Different regions and countries adhered to this system, including Western Europe and Japan.…

    • 1967 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Samurai Knights Dbq

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Have you ever wondered what the similarities and the differences were between the Samurai and knights? Samurai and knights were very strong warriors in the medieval era, they had different cultural ideas, but Samurai and Knight also had similarities. Samurai and Knights were similar, but also different in some areas. The similarities between samurai and knights were greater than the differences. This can be shown by looking at three areas, social position, training and armor, and life, honor, and death.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Samurai were a little higher up than Knights in the feudal social order. In the social order in feudal Japan if you were a Samurai you were a warrior who owed loyalty and military service to Dalmyos for land or regular payment. All of the Samurai plus their family made up about ten percent of Japans population. Now, Knights on the other hand were warriors who owed loyalty and military service to a lord for land. There were about twelve thousand Knights in England and Normany France in the twelfth century. (Documents A, B)…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Intro: Although the big empires, Europe and Japan were really successful feudalist empires and both had some similarities and differences during the 9th to 13th century, which made them unique empires in the world. Both of the empires have a similar concept of elite warriors, different treatment of women during the post-classical era, and a similar political structure of a hereditary caste system, which were the main reasons they became successful empires.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since Japan had an emperor, feudalism developed because the emperor united the clans. Before feudalism, Japan was inhabited by many different clans. Clans fought each other frequently. Lives were lived in fear of attack. People were unhappy before feudalism and they started fighting for land. Feudalism gave samurai land. Rich landowners gave land for labor and crops. Feudalism is the bond of loyalty between a lord and those to whom he has given land.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Japan and Europe during the middle ages had both been affected by agriculture, social classes, and lack of power from the king/emperor. However, there had been major differences such as the role of women, and the different beliefs for a warrior between Chivalry (knights) and the Bushido code (samurais).…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    William the conqueror believed he had the right to the throne seeing as he had been promised it.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Middle Ages Dbq

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Feudalism was very popular in the Middle Ages. Feudalism was when land owning nobles became independent of kings and princes. The classes of feudalism defined the classes of the Middle Ages these classes include, lords, vassals, fiefs, manors, and serfs. The feudal obligations between a lord and his vassal were simple. The lord provided the vassal with land and protection and the vassal provided the lord with military service and ransom.(Doc. 4) For example “I, John of Toul. Make known that I am the liegeman of the count and countess of Champagne… I will aid the count.”(Doc. 2)…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays