Preview

Federalists Strengths And Weaknesses

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
554 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Federalists Strengths And Weaknesses
The thesis of the Federalist papers was that the Article of confederation needed to be replaced with a new constitution which would ultimately save the nation from the problems of the United States government having strong state government and a weak national government. The Federalist papers addressed the weakness of the Article of Confederation. The federalist were all in favor for ratifying a new constitution because it did not serve as a firm constitution. The new constitution that was brought upon the people to consider for the nation to consider and how it managed the precise balance of federal and state government. The states would have respective freedom, but the federal government would have to ensure and understand specific conditions there were upon the right of the citizens. In Federalist No. 10, James Madison stated, “Liberty is to fiction, what air is …show more content…
Alexander Hamilton was feared that a weak nation could easily be swept up by grasping foreign power stating, “A nation despicable by its weakness, forfeits even the privilege of being neutral. (No.11, Page 51) This is one of the reason why the federalist would conduct a better central government that would be strong. Not like the Article of Confederation. Some antifederalist had argued that America could not be governed by a single republican government because it was too big to handle by one. James Madison responded, “It is, than in a democracy the people meet and exercise the government in person. In a republic, they assemble and administer it by their representatives and agents. A democracy, consequently must be confined to a small spot. A republic may extend over a large region.” This statement was to make the democracy confused and make them take decisions on public matter to be decided on by elected

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    (Doc. 6) They wanted to fix the constitution, because there were many things that needed to be fixed, so we could have a stronger government. The Federalist were afraid that the United States would have bad things happen and they were trying to prevent it from happening. (Doc. 4) Although the Anti-Federalist had their own beliefs about the constitution.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Essay

    • 304 Words
    • 1 Page

    Constitution. The Federalist interpretation of the Constitution was that it was flexible and that the…

    • 304 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most important concerns of the argument presented by James Madison in The Federalist No. 41 & 45 is the possible misappropriation of power that the government has over the country. Madison stresses the importance of maintaining civil liberties and preventing the government from having too much power. The new government will be granted great influence over many aspects of life for the American citizen so there must be a system of checks and balances.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "A free republic cannot succeed over a country of such immense extent, containing such a number of inhabitants......as that of the whole United States." (Brutus I) First of all, anti-federalists thought that a republic must be small and uniform to survive. The United States was a large country that had 1200 miles long and 200 miles inland, and it also had big population which had wide range of religions and races. They thought if a national government had a strong power that would insulate from the people and would abuse the power to deprive the powers belonged to the states. For instance, the legislature of the U.S had great and uncontroulable powers: the Congress would tax heavily from the states and regulate the inter-states trade; the Supreme Court would overrule state courts; and the president would come to raise and support large armies. Brutus noted Article I, Sec. 8 implied powers "the necessary and proper." It meant that the states reserved certain powers, and considerable powers could be added. Also, a strong central government would threaten the rights of common people. Because the Constitution was created by…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In response to the formidable factions fear, Madison explained in Federalist Paper 10 how the proposed government would be able to control the effects of any one faction or group. He stated that the larger the government, the better to control factions as it would be more difficult to deceive all the people, and there would be more factions in a larger government and nation, effectively weakening them. In addition to the faction fear, Madison addressed the public’s concern about the strength of the presented government by depicting the checks and balances that were to be implemented. Madison justified the need of a strong, central government by illustrating the practicality of checks and balances and a representative republic…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalist is a series of papers written by three men in reference and support of the Constitution. The 10th paper, The Federalist 10, is specifically written by James Madison on the topic of factions throughout the states and throughout the government. He focuses specifically on the effects that factions have on the rest of society and our ways of living. Madison starts off The Federalist 10 by first addressing what his view off a faction is which is basically a group of people or citizens who join together because of a common interest or a common purpose against another group who has opposing interests and goals. Madison's view of factions in society are along the lines of being unstoppable.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    James Madison within Essay #10 of the Federalist Papers “defines a republic to be … a government which derives all its powers directly or indirectly from the great body of the people, and is administered by persons holding their offices during pleasure for a limited time, or during good behavior. It is essential to such a government that it be derived from the great body of the society, not from an inconsiderable proportion or a favored class of it; otherwise; a handful of tyrannical nobles, exercising their oppressors by a delegation of their powers, might aspire to…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton, the leader of the Federalists, and his party believed in a loose interpretation of the Constitution. This means they think that certain powers not specifically given to the federal government was more or less implied. Hamilton says “The people are turbulent and changing; they seldom judge or determine right.” He and the Federalists think the government needs more control to run its…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalists’ envisioned a strong national government due to the fact that they thought humans were selfish. Alexander Hamilton, the leader of the Federalists, believed that a powerful, central government that use the rights protected in the Constitution would strengthen the state's. Moreover, Hamilton would rather have power in the capital than giving the states rights. “Real liberty is neither found in despotism or the extremes of democracy, but in moderate governments,” Hamilton remarked. In order to get the strong nation and government, he desired, Hamilton made a national bank to pay off taxes, print money, and to make loans. He also wanted to expand the economy to benefit business and trade.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton Implied Powers

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist, was a firm believer in the construction of a strong central government and a broad interpretation of the Constitution. This broad interpretation would allow for more government control of the people. He also envisioned a political system run by the capable men of the aristocracy. Hamilton felt that for a government to be run efficiently, it must be run by the educated (of this period, the only ones educated were the rich who could afford the training). The role of the new government of the time was to encourage economic enterprise.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forming a new government comes with challenges and obstacles that the people need to overcome for the greater good of the country. During the time that the Americans formed the government, arguments were placed into the open to be solved. Solutions that were given, many were rejected and caused a lot of disagreement. Creating a government brought the country into disagreement between the anti-federalists and federalists for the concerns of rights of the people and power that was shared among them. Firstly, the anti-federalists disagreed how the rights were to be given to one another as well as the division of power between the states. Secondly, the federalists were satisfied with the conditions that were given to them, including the power they could have and what human rights that would protect them.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Giving too much power would allow one person or a small group of individuals to rule the United States, similar to the the monarchy in England, but too little power could cause the nation to lose its unity, especially with its lack of nationalism. Alexander Hamilton was a Federalist. This meant that he was in favor of a strong Federal government.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1781, the Articles of Confederation were written in order to secure the states' rights. This document lacked many qualities necessary for a successful government, and therefore caused a great deal of debate concerning the ratification of a new system. Federalists advocated the passing of a new Constitution, welcoming the tie it would establish between states and the creation of a strong central government. Opposing the constitution were the anti-federalists, threatened by its ability to eliminate their liberties just as they were previously executed by King George III.…

    • 527 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the period between its proposal in September 1787 and ratification in 1789, the United States Constitution was the subject of numerous debates. The contending groups consisted of Federalists, those who supported ratification, and Anti-Federalists, those opposed to the constitution. Each group published a series of letters known as the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers. The Anti-Federalist papers objected to provisions of the proposed constitution while the Federalist Papers defended the rationale behind the document. Anti-Federalist objections included that; the United States was too extensive to be governed by a republic, the constitution included no bill of rights, and the federal judiciary was vaguely defined and could become too powerful. Each of these arguments is worthy of attention as an examination of the debate between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists over the proposed Constitution.…

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays