Preview

Federalist Papers 51

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
695 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Federalist Papers 51
Eric Kogan
Political Science 021
Professor Garrison Nelson

2. James Madison contended in Federalist 51 that: “If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary.” What was he saying here and how have these beliefs been enacted into law? Emphasize such key concepts from the textbook as federalism, separation of powers and check and balances here. The Federalist Papers are a collection of 85 essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay advocating the validation of the United States constitution. The series of articles were first published in 1787 - 1788 in the Independent Journal, the New-York Packet and the Daily Advertiser. At the time of publication, it was unclear who the author’s were, since Hamilton, Madison and Jay used the pseudonym “Publius”, in respect to Roman diplomat Publius Valeria Publicola. It wasn’t until Hamilton’s death in 1804 that it was clear as to who were the creator’s of the “incomparable exposition of the Constitution, a classic in political science unsurpassed in both breadth and depth by the product of any later American writer” (Federalist Papers). The Federalist Papers drafted a basic form of American federalism, meaning the papers served as a justification of the document that would soon become the constitution. The federalist’s promoted a divided federal government, a system of checks and balances where there was “division of power across the local, state and national levels of government” and a system for judicial review (William Bianco). At first, the Federalist Papers were received as unfinished and exaggerated, as many Americans were cynical of a contradiction of the bill of rights. Despite first impressions, the Federalist Papers have survived well into the 21st century, and are still used today by lawyers, judges, and jurors as a tool to interpret the Constitutional laws. Federalist 51 begins



Cited: Bianco, William T., and David T. Canon. "The Constitution and the Founding." American Politics Today. New York: W.W. Norton, 2011. 22-50. Print. "Federalist Papers." Federalist Papers. Princeton University, n.d. Web. 15 Feb. 2013. <http://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Federalist_Papers.html>. "Federalist 51 Summary - Google Drive." Federalist 51 Summary - Google Drive. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Feb. 2013. Hamilton, Alexander, John Jay, and James Madison. "The Federalist Papers." Google Books. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Feb. 2013. Madison, James, and Alexander Hamilton. "The Federalist Papers." The Library of Congress. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Feb. 2013. Madison, James. "The Federalist No. 51." The Federalist #51. Independent Journal, n.d. Web. 15 Feb. 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The author wrote the book from a more social point of view, focusing on the relationships between the founding fathers and how these relationships affected the forming of our nation. Ellis is sympathetic for how Burr and Adams are often victims of the political maneuvering and gamesmanship done by Hamilton and Jefferson. Ellis used letters from letters between Jefferson and Adams, historic books, letters between the founding fathers, newspaper articles, and historical documents to base his argument; his sources are not one sided and show multiple…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay, Tribe and Dorf describe our nation’s Constitution as a document that continues to dynamically work to achieve a balance between governmental power and individual liberty. Founding fathers like Madison and Jefferson also look to the constitution as a distinct outline, instead of a blueprint. The amendments and bills that comprise it tend to be very vague and open to interpretation of what some definitions actually mean. This leads to a lot of disputes throughout history of what the Constitution and its words stand for.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist 47- In this paper, Madison is responding to the issue of having a federal government. He argues against the assumption that this new government will be allotted too much power and control America as an empire. In response, Madison writes that the U.S Constitution balances the government well by using the system of separation of powers among the executive, judiciary, and legislature. Madison also stated that these powers would blend and intertwine; however that would not affect the factor of separation of power. To support his argument, Madison referred to the writings of Montesquieu. According to Montesquieu, tyranny results when one branch of government concurrently holds the powers of another branch. However, Madison argues that Montesquieu "did not mean that these departments ought to have no partial agency in, or no control over, the acts of each other." He interprets this as a system that supports checks and balances. Overall, he responds by stating his views on separation of power and by stating checks and balances has been followed in individual state constitutions before, so it should be trusted now.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the introduction, Countryman provides basic historical context about the people and issues during the time of the Constitution for readers who are not familiar with it, because it helps the reader better understand the rest of the book. He selects five essays exploring what the political issues were in 1787, whether the Framers were counter-revolutionaries, what the Federalists achieved, whether the Constitution created a republic of white men, and whether we can know the original intent of the Framers. Countryman uses each of these essays to answer a question related to the book’s title.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit #3 Review

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The US Constitution is one of the most influential documents in the history of modern governance. The system of government established by the writers of this document not only reflected and helped to ensure the hopes and desires of many citizens of the newly independent American state, but, perhaps more importantly, this system has served as a dramatic symbol for those people throughout the world who have struggled against tyranny and oppression ever since. This document has also served as a model for the creation of new governments over the past two hundred years. Nevertheless, some scholars, including Howard Zinn and Charles Beard, who wrote An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution, contend that this document is not the democratic mantra that its supporters proclaim it to be. These critics argue that the Constitution was designed primarily to protect the economic interests of the aristocracy, not only from the tyranny of the government, but also from the political pressures of the lower classes. They point to the ideas of the separation of powers, federalism, and checks and balances as being primarily ways in which the elites of American society could insulate themselves from the will of the common people rather than efforts to protect against tyrannical government. These scholars also look to the writings of James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton in The Federalist Papers to support their contentions. Finally, they look to the actions of some of the founding fathers, like Washington, Hamilton, Adams, and even Jefferson to find support for this theory. During this unit, we will examine this evidence in order to assess the validity of this theory as compared to the more traditional views of most Americans. As always, finding the truth requires a delicate balance of inquisitiveness, interpretation, speculation, and appreciation for subtlety. There are seldom…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. The Republicans shut down the U.S. Federal Government, or DID they?Well it depends on who you speak to and what party affiliation they favor. But knowing who had the option to keep the government running and chose not to, is very clear. The budget bill was passed by the House of Representatives covering everything that the government does on a daily basis for all of FY 2014, except for the Affordable Care Act.…

    • 5021 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fed Papers

    • 197900 Words
    • 792 Pages

    The Federalist Papers is a publication of the Pennsylvania State University. This Portable Document file is furnished free and without any charge of any kind. Any person using this document file, for any purpose, and in any way does so at his or her own risk. Neither the Pennsylvania State University nor Jim Manis, Faculty Editor, nor anyone associated with the Pennsylvania State University assumes any responsibility for the material contained within the document or for the file as an electronic transmission, in any way. The Federalist Papers, the Pennsylvania State University, Electronic Classics Series, Jim Manis, Faculty Editor, Hazleton, PA 18202-1291 is a Portable Document File produced as part of an ongoing student publication project to bring classical works of literature, in English, to free and easy access of those wishing to make use of them. Cover Design: Jim Manis Copyright © 2001 The Pennsylvania State University…

    • 197900 Words
    • 792 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The modern American public often views the Founding Fathers of the United States as level-headed, well-intentioned, diplomatic, successful statesmen. Upon further investigation and analysis, a clear discordance in the men’s visions of the American Spirit shows its face. Some founders strived for a strong centralized federal government while others desired a union of essentially independent states. This dichotomy reveals the schism of understanding amongst the “Founding Brothers” as illuminated in the historical analysis by Joseph Ellis.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    James Madison argues how checks and balances can not only advocate a separation of powers but also create an effective government. Madison writes to help his readers understand how a well structured government can lead to a successful country. One of his main arguments is that no branch should have too much power, therefore, different branches of government should exist. "Legislative, judiciary magistracies should be drawn from the same fountain of authority, the people, through canals having no communication whatever with one another." To assure greater independence, government is separated into the Legislative Branch, the House of the Representatives and the Senate. He states "Ambition must be made to counteract ambition." meaning the ambitions of legislators must be checked by the executive and judicial branch which is then checked by the ambitions of legislators and presidents. This separation of powers advocated the idea of compromise. Madison also asserts that the members of each branch should not be too dependent on the members of the other two branches. If a man is presented with too much power, it may rule over him. Madison states "If men were angels, no government would be necessary. " The government must control the people but control itself as well. While the will of the people is no doubt the primary control on the government, other controls are necessary.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    hudson draper

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Bibliography: Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, John Jay. The Federalist Papers. Ed. Random House. New York City: Random House, 1787-1788.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Federalist Papers were a set of documents written mostly by Alexander Hamilton and James Madison. It was a treatise on free government in peace and security. The main topic discussed in the Federalist Papers were one: the defects of the government and the Articles of Confederation. And two: the new constitution's different components of the three branches of the government. The intent of the Federalist Papers was to secure the ratification of a constitution providing for a more perfect union. The Federalist Papers depicted that the Union appears as a means to achieve the safety and welfare of its parts. In general, the Federalists discusses federalism as a means to achieve free government in peace and security. The five basic themes included…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Executive Privilege

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Hamilton, Alexander, and John C. Hamilton. The works of Alexander Hamilton comprising his correspondence, and his political and official writings, exclusive of the Federalist, civil and military. New York: J.F. Trow, 1851. Print.…

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Bicameral Motivations

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages

    WHY WOULD A COUNTRY ADOPT A BICAMERAL SYSTEM? DISCUSS WITH REFERENCE TO MEG RUSSELL’S TREATMENT OF THE TOPIC AND USE EXAMPLES IN YOUR ANSWER.…

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa68.htm “The Federalist No. 68: The Mode of Electing the President” Independent Journal Wednesday, March 12, 1788…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Madison, James. (1788) “The Alleged Tendency of the New Plan to Elevate the Few at the Expense of the Many Considered in Connection with Representation.” New York Packet. The Federalist.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays