Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Federalist Paper

Satisfactory Essays
490 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Federalist Paper
Mason Payonk
Professor Travaline
American Government
17 February 2014
Federalist 76 and 77 Since breaking off from the British Monarchy, the American people wanted to be as far away from a dictatorship as possible. One of the main complaints regarding the newly proposed constitution was the potential strength of the Executive Branch. In Federalist papers 76 and 77, Alexander Hamilton give several reasons as to why the Executive power would be limited in power. Alexander Hamilton places a lot of emphasis on the Appointments clause, which was the power of the President to appoint influential government officials such as Supreme Court justices and cabinet members. He explained to readers that there is a major check on this Presidential power, which is the Senate’s duty of denying the appointments. Not only did Hamilton assure the readers that the President’s power would be balanced, but he also explained that a true test of a good government is it’s tendency to produce a good administration. Therefore, with all these checks put into place, America had the potential of creating a perfectly balanced and supreme government. He also explained that since the Senate had the power to reject these nominees, it would make way for the fittest politicians. Instead of the President just being able to appoint any body he wants, he would have to compromise with the other branch of government. In Federalist paper 77, Hamilton again talks much about the Appointments clause, but this time, instead of laying out what it does and how it will work, he attempts to ensure readers that it will create an efficient government. The power of the senate to discard the presidential appointments will provide stability to the administration. Because Senate members serve longer terms than the President, as well as an unlimited amount, the ability of the president to add a radical or begin a branch revolution would be nearly impossible because the Senate would continuously reject the appointments. Hamilton then goes on to talk about the other powers that the president has such as reporting to them what he thought needs to be done through regular communication and the State of the Union. He also brings up his ability to call special sessions of Congress. This power is the President’s ability to check Congress. If they are refusing to get things done and continuously butting heads, the executive can force them into session in times where they normally wouldn’t be. Ultimately, Hamilton wanted to convey to the national public that newly proposed branches of government would not overpower each other. The provisions that the founding fathers had laid out in the constitution ensured that one branch could not become supreme over the other. Major decisions such as Presidential appointments could not create an unfair advantage because they were forced to be checked by the Senate. Just like the other Federalist papers, 76 and 77 were Hamilton’s attempt to justify things that the Anti-federalists were not optimistic about.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    James Madison begins his paper stating that he believes that each branch of the government should be independent from one another. If possible the branches would have as little agency with one another as possible. He believed that members from the different branches of the government should not be able to appoint each other or decide on other salaries. If these rules were followed the people would be in more control of the government by picking the best representative in each branch of the government. Madison and the Framers realized that every position couldn’t be elective because of political pressures and certain needed qualifications, such as in the judicial…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Federalist No. 39 “The conformity of the Plan to Republican Principles,” is the thirty-ninth of The Federalist Papers and was published by James Madison on January 18, 1788. Madison defines what a Republican form of government is considered, which was what the nation was currently called. It also considers whether the nation is federal or national: a confederacy, or consolidation of states. At the current moment the nation was considered Federal and states were confederate, but they were leaning towards A National government. (federal vs. national government.) Madison then defines what republic means and states three rules which must comply to be considered a Republic:…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist No. 10 Summary

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Federalist No. 10 addresses the question of how to guard against "factions", or groups of citizens, with interests contrary to the rights of others or the interests of the whole community. Madison saw factions as inevitable due to the nature of man - that is, as long as men hold differing opinions, have differing amounts of wealth, and own differing amount of property, they will continue to form alliances with people who are most similar to them, and they will sometimes work against the public interest, and infringe upon the rights of others. Thus, he questions how to guard against those dangers. Federalist No. 10 continues a theme begun in Federalist No. 9; it is titled, "The Same Subject Continued: The Utility of the Union as a Safeguard…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bowman’s American Presidency narrates the inception of the presidency that arose from the new Constitution and its significance in marking the autonomy of the Confederation. Bowman put a good case about how the office of the presidency has evolved over the years from the reserved role of the composers of the Constitution, to the upturn of a president-focused government during the early twentieth century. Bowman provides evidence indicating that the composers of the Constitution were cautious of creating an executive arm that would create a tyrant. He gives an example of how the…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton believed that power was necessary for doing a thing. For example, power was needed in collecting taxes. Chapter 34 of Hamilton’s writings in Federalist paper is more about the concurrent jurisdiction, which covers the matter of taxes. It was argued that the concurrent jurisdiction played and important role by the power of revenue raising. Hamilton argued higher tariffs could affect consumers, because he believed that higher tariffs meant higher prices. Besides, higher prices would create monopoly that would put the market in a difficult situation. Hamilton’s altogether vision, which was seen as impossible by him, because it was also impossible to have different, trade members and occupation. He argued that the government should consider merchants as patron and friend. The most important thing was to keep taxes low, because it was the only boundary between the poorest to the wealthiest. Hamilton was disappointed about the poll taxes, because he believed that poll taxes should be imposed when…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This, in effect, limits the options to detach power of the three branches of government such as judicial, legislative, and executive branches. As time progresses throughout the American history, new policies will continue to be implemented and immediately put into effect during the presidential era. Of course, neither candidate did not want to argue on issues about how the government led the people but how the government designed the powers that were put into laws to protect and serve the people of our country but, indeed, is beneficial to all citizens and our everyday lives. Their main focus was the aspects of how lawmaking should be administered and applied to all civilians equally. “President Woodrow Wilson stated four reasons why there should be a science of administration: (1) straighten the paths of government; (2) make its business businesslike; (3) strengthen its organization; and (4) crown its dutifulness” (Jison, 2014, para…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the middle of 1700’s, Americans were unhappy with British rule, to show their unhappiness they established the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration of Independence was ratified on July 4, 1776. After the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation were passed but had a weak central government because congress could not levy taxes. Therefore, the government did not have any money to help improve the new nation. This weakness led to the Constitution and the Federalist papers. The Constitution was signed by 55 men meeting in secret in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to establish a new political system. The Federalist papers were created to convince at least nine of the 13 states to ratify the…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton said, “He wanted a strong federal government”(Doc 1). The benefits of having a federal government was that the country would have a stronger say over policies than States. Hamilton know that if we had a federal government(Doc 1). If states had power and we needed to apply a law/act for the country it would be harder to apply rather than if we had a federal government. Hamilton's idea for having a federal government is a great idea that would give the country more power and a stronger say over laws/acts. Hamilton’s idea to have a strong federal government is another of his many great ideas to improve the…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalist is a series of papers written by three men in reference and support of the Constitution. The 10th paper, The Federalist 10, is specifically written by James Madison on the topic of factions throughout the states and throughout the government. He focuses specifically on the effects that factions have on the rest of society and our ways of living. Madison starts off The Federalist 10 by first addressing what his view off a faction is which is basically a group of people or citizens who join together because of a common interest or a common purpose against another group who has opposing interests and goals. Madison's view of factions in society are along the lines of being unstoppable.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton being the first Secretary of Treasury devised a plan to get rid of the debt of the war. With this plan the debt was settled but with an increase in social tensions with the North and South. Hamilton’s other idea of a National Bank created major discontent with the people and the Political leaders. This creates a catalyst of separation between the political parties, which is the defining moment of the split political parties we see today. With this split the idea of different interpretations of the Constitution played a huge role with the Federalists taking a loose stance and the Republicans a stricter view. Because of Hamilton’s continued economic changes it sparked the Whiskey Rebellion. This gave the government a test of its ability to enforce its power. This was a great change because a few years earlier the government couldn't subdue Shays Rebellion. Later on the early domestic affairs escalated with the incoming of foreign affairs. Thus proving that without the first dealings with domestic affairs the fact of facing and oncoming threat from foreign affairs gave us an advantage/plan of action to take to fight and solve the upcoming…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However Jefferson had supported the average man unlike Hamilton who excluded the poor in his plans for the government and economy. Another example would be that Hamilton’s plan could become corrupted from the chosen few to become greedy and lead into tyranny. Jefferson had instead believed in divided power and in a weaker central government as he feared for a strong central government to take away liberty. The people participating in the federal government could be tempted to serve themselves rather than the people. Jefferson believed in the common people, calling them the “chosen people of God” (8). However Hamilton trusted only the rich and educated to partake in the government which would result with where the “poor would become poorer”…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When George Washington appointed both Hamilton and Jefferson to his cabinet, it was obvious that there would be controversy. These two men both had very different views, and both helped to create what we practice as today's government. Though both made good points, it was Hamilton who had the right idea for government. Even now, his ideas are perfect for how current government should be run.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ideal American republic for Hamilton from Johnson perspective is that Hamilton created a scheme in order to run the country. The scheme was helpful to America because as he predicted America was able to borrow money more cheaply. The Debt-funding was the first policy drafted by Hamilton. He also spoke about implemented measures for individuals who tried to rebel against taxation. Hamilton got the militia to dissolve the rebellion to basically prove the government is not in control. In Zinn’s argument about Hamilton, he stated that Hamilton suggested that there should be a president and senate for life and the government should a line itself with the richest element of the society.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton, the leader of the Federalists, and his party believed in a loose interpretation of the Constitution. This means they think that certain powers not specifically given to the federal government was more or less implied. Hamilton says “The people are turbulent and changing; they seldom judge or determine right.” He and the Federalists think the government needs more control to run its…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Presidency is a puzzling aspect to most Americans. There is a lot of debate about the system's strengths and weaknesses. I would like to offer a broad concept of the American constitutional system, which are the executive, legislative and judicial branches. To begin to grasp the constitutional system, I would like to discuss why the forefathers composed it this way. The forefathers chose a mixed government that represented three existing forms of government: a monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy. The president would represent the elected monarchy, the Senate would represent the aristocracy, and the House of Representatives would represent the democracy. The American presidency has a great deal of strength and weakness, which I will discuss in this paper.…

    • 875 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays