Preview

Federalism: A Laboratory Of Democracy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
288 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Federalism: A Laboratory Of Democracy
Federalism is a laboratory of democracy because states and cities are vital parts of American government. States should cater its laws to the values and wants of the people in the state. With certain situations and instances, national laws do not work across the nation. For example, laws regarding hunting, fishing, and mining may be pertinent in Alaska, but would be completely impractical and even dangerous if applied to some other states. Federalism allows for each individual state to create laws that specifically apply to the setting and conditions that the state finds itself in. This way, laws can be direct, meaningful, and serve a greater purpose to the individuals who live and work in the area. Federalism allows each state to focus more energy and resources on their specialized agenda. Federalism also promotes state governments to experiment with policy and serve as an example to other states. Federalism makes it easier to create tailored law. Federalism is a laboratory for democracy because it encourages research in good policy. Numerous states have devised their own laws regarding the regulation of controlled substances. Each state can have slightly different language in their law, leading to different outcomes. If the federal government ever wants to enact the most effective law, they can look at the individual states and see which law has worked the best. This procedure was applied when the Affordable Care Act was created, where the statewide health care system used in Massachusetts became the model for a national health care law.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Why is our national government a Federal Democratic Republic? Well my most simple answer for this is. We are a Federal Democratic Republic because the citizens are the ones that have the power, and the government itself is ran through elected officials. Or at least that's what we like to tell ourselves. The politics of this country work in a peculiar way, since usually the person who has the most funded campaign, is the one who wins, and the ones who tend fund a politicians campaign usually happen to be big corporations so they can call in favors later. So to some extent our elections are bought. Whoever has the most money can travel to more places, make more billboards, bumper stickers, commercials, etc. they have more resources to tell…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Before the state convention, there is a great issue about liberty. One proponents of the Constitution are federalists who favor to establish a stronger national government; one opponents of the Constitution are anti-federalists who favor to establish a weaker national government. Federalists think only a stronger national government have an ability to keep the states in control. Anti-federalists think the states should have more power than the national government. Even though the conflict between federalist and anti-federalist doesn't stop, whether it is a federalists or anti-federalists, they have the same dream to united the states to become a strong country. The perfect decision is to use the best way to administrate the country and stabilize the society. In my opinion, a stronger national government will keep the country developing.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism is the idea of division of power between central and state governments (Madison Document A). In a compound government both the state and central governments must approve on the subject at hand for it too go into effect (Document A). Therefore not only one side is heard and can be made to help the people. Both governments share the powers to tax, borrow money, set up courts, make laws, and enforce laws. This provides for double security to the people because you have two different governments looking over these important powers making sure they are not misused. Federalism guards against tyranny because two separate governments are watching to make sure that the other does not become corrupt with its powers and the approval of both governments is needed to approve on matters (Document A). The state and central government are one compound government but two different distinct governments with equal…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalist and Anti-Federalist perspectives at first tend to appear to be polar opposites in nature. The Federalists supported and sought to ratify the Constitution of the United States of America. Whereas the Anti-Federalists were hesitant to do so, and feared that the powers allotted in the Constitution would result in the newly birthed United States descending into a monarchy. The very same form of government that had proved dissatisfactory to the colonists in the first place. Therefore it may appear to be a moot point when deciding whether both viewpoints would be in harmony or opposition in regards to the power held by the modern presidency. The Anti-Federalists believed that power should rest with the states. However the Federalists wanted a strong central government headed by one official. This was because the Articles of Confederation (which gave the majority of power to the states) had failed miserably. However, while the Federalists and Anti-Federalists held opposite viewpoints, they had the same goal in mind: To create a free and balanced society, “It is here taken for granted, that all agree in this, that whatever government we adopt, it ought to be a free one,” (Brutus, 25). However, due to the initial ambiguous measure the framers of the Constitution took with regards to the executive branch, there have historically been events of a United States President overstepping his boundaries and violating the merits of both U.S. and Constitutional doctrine. Therefore both the Federalists as well as the Anti-Federalists would agree that in light of decisions made during George W. Bush’s consecutive terms that the modern presidency must be restricted.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What was the original intent of the U.S. Constitution? Why did Alexander Hamilton want to create a more powerful centralization of federal government? What is the difference between Democratic-Republican and Federalist? Analyzing and resolving constitutional issues was an ongoing process during the eighteenth century. According to Jack Rakove “… from a historical perspective this book, guidelines, approval around the constitution, form political worries about reviewing in 1780, the Constitution and the clarification of the scope that "the debate on the role of the original intent of the constitutional debate" should be interpreted to play.” 1 Also Rakove thinks the federal constitution must be developed to address the representatives of the executive…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Anti Federalist- small farmers frontiersmen who believed that government should be close to the people and that the concentration of power in the elites is dangerous. This relates to the topic of are unit because people were trying to figure out a way to govern our country and the Anti- federalists thought a certain way. This concept is important to American politics because the Anti federalists were a party who had a certain belief and they are just like the republican or democratic party today.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    We Federalist’s believe that the government needs to be divided into three parts, with equal powers and balances and checks, for it to work effectively. Now the Anti-Federalist’s believe that we are trying to give all power to the larger states in the North and ignore the needs of our brethren the South states. We are not. We are just trying to create a fair government.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cooperative Federalism

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Federalism is defined as “the federal principle or system of government”. This concept of “federalism” is explored in Lowi et al and Zimmerman. These two sources list and define two types of federalism. The first type they list is dual federalism, the second one is cooperative federalism. One of the most distinctive differences between the two is how the powers of the national and state governments are defined, this ties into the classic struggle of Founding Fathers: How should power be separated between the states and the national government? Both of these systems are used in our Constitution, however, I believe our current situation in the United States best fits under the system of cooperative federalism. These concepts I will explore in…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism has been put in place to allow two or more entities to share control over one area. In the United States, power is separated between the national government and state government, which prohibits one area of government gaining too much control. This is called cooperative federalism, which is where national, state, and local government work together to solve common problems. The other type of federalism is called dual federalism. Dual federalism is like a layered cake because the state and national government each have specific powers, unlike cooperative federalism.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti Federalism Dbq

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The federalist called for a strong central government, a federal bank and an army. They proposed a new constitution, while the Anti-federalist wanted to remain under the Articles of Confederation. The Anti-federalist planned for the almost unavoidable corruption of a powerful central government. They wanted true federalism, a much better plan for our country long term.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A federal system checks the growth of tyranny, allows unity without uniformity, encourages experimentation, and keeps government closer to the people. In this system, the people are one with the government so the people like the government and it prevents chaos. In the twenty-first century,…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism Interview 2

    • 803 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. What were the Mayor's responsibilities prior to the hurricane? Stock the shelters with food and water, mobilize cities and school buses for evacuation.…

    • 803 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both sides had strong opinions and beliefs on the subject, but the side that I thought was more convincing was the Federalists side. I think the Federalists were right when they said America was in need of a stronger national government. If our government were to become weak, like the Anti-Federalists wanted, then our world would become a chaotic mess, the rules wouldn’t apply to everyone. I think that you need to have rules and laws to keep people in check, if we didn’t have them then everyone and everything would become crazy.…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    foundations of us democracy

    • 2362 Words
    • 10 Pages

    This unit activity will explore the concept of civil society, how it relates to governments on a spectrum from democratic to totalitarian, and how the United States’ form of government establishes and supports room for civil society to flourish.…

    • 2362 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sovereignty, which is the authority to govern has three main categories, federalism, confederacy, and unitary system. Federalism limits the power of the government by dividing the national, and the state government. State and Federal power is then again divided into legislative, judiciary, and executive branches. This all keeps no one group maintaining all of the power, it is a constant check and balance. The power of the state is what the national government does not have, and also has to be deemed as legal. Both the state and federal government have denied powers, which are as you can guess powers that are denied to them. The history of federalism in the United states started off as a dual federalism in which the power of the federal government was limited to enumerated, which was an overall state centered form.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays