“A date which will live in infamy,” could be considered the day that Japan bombed Pearl Harbor, or it could be considered the day when one of the biggest controversies of American history took place. Either case, the quote is describing the same scenario. One of the biggest controversies in American history is whether or not President Franklin Delano Roosevelt knew beforehand about the attack on Pearl Harbor. There are many reasons pointing in the direction that he did know about the attack and refused to take action.
Months before the attack on Pearl Harbor, Americans had been decoding the Japanese messages. The messages led to signs that the Japanese were threatened by Roosevelt’s raw material and oil embargoes causing the Japanese to prepare for war with America. These messages were intercepted and decoded. According to U.S. News & World Report, one of the most controversial (messages) was decoded in October 1941…it asked the Japanese Consulate in Honolulu for regular reports on the location of ‘warships and aircraft carriers…at anchor, tied up at wharves, buoys, and in the docks’ in Pearl Harbor.” After America decoded this message, vague warnings were sent on November 27 and 28 to Pearl Harbor to be on alert, but not to take it too seriously because America did not want any unnecessary publicity.
Since the attack on Pearl Harbor, many people have instantly thrown blame on Admiral Husband E. Kimmel and Lieutenant General Walter C. Short. According to U.S. News & World Report, “The two were accused of ‘dereliction of duty…. The Japanese attack was a complete surprise to the commanders and they failed to make suitable dispositions to meet such an attack.’” The problem with accusing Kimmel and Short of “dereliction of duty” is that Washington D.C. knew of an imminent attack and no one informed Kimmel and Short. How is it justified to blame the two men in charge that knew the least about the situation?
People speculate why only the “old”...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document