Justin Marc C. Tariman B.S.B.A. MKTG 4March 14, 2013
The purpose of this case study analysis report to understand and formulate a set of actions for the case of a company that is experiencing rapid environment changes and difficulty in protecting its core business such as how IBM perceived its mainframes as king of computers.
IBM biggest problems include its huge size, highly bureaucratic decision making approach,and its management's difficulty in accepting the fact mainframes become obsolete sooner. The company lost on its focus toward meeting the needs of customers and instead over-emphasizing the needs of the mainframes.
Methods of Analysis
Methods of analysis used in the case were S.W.O.T. Analysis and Porter's 5 Forces of Industry Attractiveness to identify IBM's competitive advantage in a rapid changing environment and where in particular area the company failed to achieve in maintaining its position as market leader.
Alternative Course of Action
Take advantage – Enter into systems integration, outsourcing, and consultancy services to fully provide a package of IT products and services. Sustain – Using IBM's “contention” system to achieved scale economies in production and cost advantages. Build – Building competitive advantage on every division while maintaining interdependence among these divisions and prevent rivalry among these divisions. Avoid – Avoid building one-side selling on product lines by giving each division its own sales force instead of having a separate division for sales force.
It is recommended for IBM to ready its company in entering into systems integration, outsourcing, and consultancy services to fully provide a package of IT products and services. It's a new business but it could greatly give more value on its products. This is also an advantage for IBM to used the size of its organization to outsource some of its...