Preview

Fair Laws By Martin Luther King Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
266 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fair Laws By Martin Luther King Summary
Martin Luther King Jr explains the definitions to distinguish between unfair and fair laws. The author writes that a fair law conforms to the “moral law or the law of god” (King, par. 16). He describes that an unfair law is “out of harmony with the moral” (King, par. 16). King points out that the fair law can “uplifts human personality”, but the unfair law can “degrades human personality” (par.16). He states that, when a majority forces a minority to follow a law that does not apply itself, then it acts unjustly (King, par. 17).
King describes that, if a majority “is willing to follow itself”, then he law considering just (par. 17). The author knowledges that they were not involved in unfair laws “for they did not have the unhampered right

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    About individual civil rights. In the ´Letter from Birmingham Jail”, Martin Luther King sorts to respond to the criticism of several clergy men since he believes they are “men of genuine good will”. In respond to what they said about their actions being “unwise and untimely”. King explains their delay in action due to the occurring events, back to back. They do not wish the media to copulate their actions with the events, because they are two separate things. After that explanation, King states what brought him in Birmingham. Injustice is what brought this man to the city. King states that Birmingham is the most segregated city in America. Simply because there are brutal police incidents. Bombings of Negro properties such as homes, churches than any other city. And colored people are treated unjustly in courts. Thus with these things happening in Birmingham, King went there to get justice for the oppressed, because he believes that their individual civil rights are…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the letter, Martin Luther King strategically argues to the clergymen that segregation laws imposed on African Americans are nothing more than unjust and immoral. He supports this claim by using a method of comparison of current events to historical and biblical events. King states that there two kinds of laws. There are just laws and there are unjust laws. King argues that a just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God, and an unjust law is out of harmony with the moral law. King’s argument is valid because he is right about the differences between just and unjust…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It has been sixty years since the Civil Rights movement began. During that time, Civil Rights activists were attempting to combat injustices and discrimination throughout the South and other parts of America. Since its end in 1968, many Americans think that there has been real progress made in regards to the issue of injustices in America. A poll conducted in June of 2014 found that nearly eight in ten Americans think there has been real progress made since the 1960s in ridding the country of discrimination. While the fight against injustice and discrimination was raging, one man was on the front line leading the battle, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. King, though extremely passionate about his cause, was non-violent in his approach to attaining his objectives of justifying his cause, demonstrating the trials of African Americans in America, and arguing that immediate action is paramount. While in a…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King, however, didn’t advocate citizens transcending the law, but rather, Dr. King believed that in order to remedy injustice in society, people must openly break the unjust law and accept punishment in showing “highest respect for the law”(King p.23). In a rather interesting yet extreme example, King relates civil disobedience to the Holocaust: “It was ‘illegal’ to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler’s Germany. But I am sure that, if I had lived in Germany during that time, I would have aided and comforted my Jewish brothers even though it was illegal. If I lived in a communist country today where certain principles dear to the Christian faith are suppressed, I believe I would openly advocate disobeying these anti-religious laws”(King p.23). King cites such an example to bring out the visceral reaction of the audience, given the Holocaust’s widespread negative publicity and condemnation. Thus, King manipulates the reader’s emotions to bring them on board with the idea of civil disobedience. No one would dare question the rectitude of aiding a helpless Jew. King attempts direct the same negative connotation of the Holocaust to segregation in the U.S. to fight injustice in…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In his “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, King talks about the difference between unjust and just laws. He tells us that everyone has a moral code to adhere to with accordance the laws that are just. Yet, the laws that are seen as unjust, should be unfollowed by the people. According to King, just law is a moral law or the law of God, whereas unjust law is made up by humans and does not have anything common with eternal and natural law. MLK would advise the people to disobey this act in any way possible, an unjust law is not one that should be followed. MLK was very adamant about this, the laws that are unfair to the people are meant to be disobeyed in order to hopefully change…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thoreau’s essay “Civil Disobedience,” was one of King’s focus points which led him to believe in disobeying unjust laws. King felt unjust laws could be described as ones that were…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. King uses logical appeal in order to explain the difference between just and unjust laws. Logical appeal is the strategic use of logic, claims, and evidence to convince an audience of a certain point. He states that "a just law is a man-made code that agrees with the moral law or the law of God. An law is unjust it is inflicted on a minority that, had no part in enacting or devising the law. An unjust law degrades human personality. King considered the laws of segregation to be unjust laws because "segregation distorts the soul and degrades the personality."…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King describes the unjust laws to support how there were injustices in Birmingham, that were used to maintain the status quo. For example, King states “an unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law”, he specifically chose the word moral because the white moderate, or the clergy men are religious figures who identify with the moral code. In addition, he states “an unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal and natural law” which he uses to describe how it’s naturally wrong, and unreasonable for them to put these laws into place, and it only serves the purpose to help the ones enforcing and creating the laws, helping them maintain the status quo. These unjust laws that are put in place in order…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King states the ways the protests were handled emphasizing the unfairness of the monitoring. For example, he mentions the angry violent dogs that aggressively bite and attack six unarmed, nonviolent negroes. Secondly, the claim that the supposedly “break” such laws is emphasized by King claiming the reasons for this action. He declares that there are two types of laws. The ones that should be followed and the ones that are to morally wrong that they should not be followed; the just laws and the unjust laws. the segregation laws, for example, are unjust laws.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law, or the law of god (King).” Basically King is saying a just law is one that everyone can agree on to be morally right. Justice Rawls states justice as “The sense of justice is continuous with the love of mankind.” However, the more complicated question that Dr. King dissects is : What makes a law unjust. King suggests that an unjust law does not match up with morality. If a law degrades human personality it is unjust, giving the segregated a false sense of inferiority. (King). He also suggests that if the minority of a given law had no say in the democratic process of making this law, it is in no way…

    • 1822 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King says, “Hence segregation is not only politically, economically and sociologically unsound, it is morally wrong and sinful”(13). King uses “God Law”(morals) to explain why segregations needs to stop. God always pushes you to do the moral choice, so why have all these church leaders chosen to head down the morally wrong path? The law itself it's okay because it is an unjust law, but it is morally wrong. But what is the difference between a just law and an unjust law? King explains that very well. The clergymen wants to know why they chose to follow some laws and disregard the rest. A just law is any law that makes you a better person, an unjust law does the opposite. That’s why king chose to follow only some laws; he was making the moral choice, and did what was right in his eyes. So when he was protesting, yes it was illegal for him to do, but in his heart it was the right…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the 1954 Supreme court decision outlining segregation in public schools improved because of the “Law’ and not because of “moral” acceptance. Dr. King is specific in describing two types of laws: the just laws, and unjust laws. Dr. King referred to St. Augustine that “an unjust law is no law at all”. He connected just laws to moral law or the law of God. He described an unjust law as a man-made code that does not kinship or is out of harmony with the moral law rooted in eternal or natural law. King makes the difference clear by describing an unjust law as not binding on the majority of people or itself. The majority follows a just law and minority as well, equal and distributed…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King says an unjust law is “a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself….difference made legal.”…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler’s Germany. Even so, I am sure that, had I lived in Germany at that time, I would have…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unjust Laws

    • 1053 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Firstly, one must define what an unjust law is. According to Martin Luther King, an unjust law is “any law that degrades human personality” (King 179). In other words, it is a law that is directed against a certain group of people or is inflicted on a minority. He continues on by stating that “an unjust law is a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself” (King 179), meaning that any law that causes a person to suffer simply because they do not agree with this majority is an incorrect and unjust law.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays