Preview

Failure Of Operation Torch

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1511 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Failure Of Operation Torch
As Operation Torch, the North African Campaign, was coming to an end, the Allies made the next logical decision to attack Sicily and the “soft underbelly” of the Axis with Operation Husky. This decision continued the momentum gained with the success in North Africa, opened the shipping lanes in the Mediterranean and provided relief to the Russian front . Although, Operation Husky was successful, better integration of the attributes of mission command, understanding, trust and intent and the joint functions of fires and movement and maneuver would have led to a quicker and more decisive defeat of the Axis in Sicily.
The decision to attack Sicily compounded a series of mission command issues that plagued the Allies throughout the North African
…show more content…
This lack of understanding required a hands on top down driven approach to ensure the unity of effort by all partners, which is made possible through decentralized execution of centralized, overarching plans . As the Allied Supreme Commander, General Eisenhower, due to continued operations in Africa, failed to drive the process, influence teams and commands and ensure the unity of effort. A primary responsibility of any Commander . Eisenhower dedicated the planning for Operation Husky to Major General Gairdner, Force 141. Force 141 suffered from a lack of command influence, geographic distances between key decision maker and an inexperienced staff . The plan approved by this staff was so heavily criticized by General Montgomery that Eisenhower relented and approved a plan created by Montgomery’s staff, creating much ill will between senior officers . The inability of General Eisenhower and Alexander, his Deputy and Allied Ground Force Commander, to develop a common understanding magnified the atmosphere of distrust amongst his commanders that slowed the development and execution of the plan and allowed the continued buildup of German forces in …show more content…
Although, there were plenty of instances in which units at the tactical level consolidated lost forces, disrupted communication lines, and succeeded in capturing critical objectives, the Allied 7th and 8th Army failed to do the same at the operational level due to the lack of a clear and concise purpose of the operation and overall end state . The lack of a long-term strategy for the conduct of the war against the Axis resulted in Operation Husky being just the next logical step following Operation Torch. This lead the Allies to seeing the country as critical for opening communication lanes, diverting German strength from the Russian front and pressuring Italy to drop out of the war . However, General Eisenhower failed to establish a clear and concise purpose and intent for the Allies on Sicily and allowed the German and Italian armies to delay the inevitable until they diverted soldiers to Italy from the Russian front in its defense and withdrew over 114,000 men, 5500 vehicles and 6800 tons of equipment . Eisenhower’s failure to establish any commander’s intent hampered the initiative by his commanders and delayed the capture of Sicily and the destruction of the German Army before they could escape through

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Operation Pedestal

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Operation Pedestal could be described as one of the most important successes for the Allies in World War II. Little celebration is given to it despite having turned the war in Britain's favour. During the summer of 1942, the key position of the British base in Malta, the tiny island south of Italy, was put under siege. The base enabled the Allies to boycott Axis supply convoys destined for North Africa and prevented the Axis powers from gaining a monopoly of the Mediterranean. Operation Pedestal, was Britain's final attempt to save Malta, and had it falied, the outcome of World War II may have been very different.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Operation Overlord was the code name used for the Allied attack on German-occupied Northern France in the summer of 1944. The organization responsible for planning this task was SHAEF, the Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force, and the officer in command of Overlord was Major General Dwight D. Eisenhower. Command of ground forces was given to General Bernard Montgomery, while naval forces would be commanded by Admiral Bertram Ramsay. Air forces were under the control of Air Chief Marshal Trafford Leigh-Mallary, and supply and logistics the task of Lt. General John Lee.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Commander’s intent represents a unifying idea that allows decentralized execution within centralized, overarching guidance.” This intent insures a clear purpose for an operation and an expected end state. The first challenge that Eisenhower encountered with planning for this operation was the planning staff itself. These planners, inexperienced at this type of operation, had difficulty from the beginning, because most of the decision makers were still preoccupied with ongoing operations and geographically dispersed. As a result, Eisenhower gave no consideration to their first effort, nor did either he or Alexander provide “effective leadership during this critical stage... Instead, due to indecisiveness by Eisenhower and inattentiveness by Alexander, a frustrated Montgomery tasked his staff to develop their own plans for Husky. This became the norm and as a result the functional commanders – air, land, sea components – developed their own objectives and planning without closely coordinating their actions. Considering this invasion was a compromise between allied partners, it “left commanders in the field with an imperfect understanding of the ultimate purpose of the operation.” Thus, no…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Operation Anaconda: Joint Functions Operation Anaconda kicked off on March 2nd, 2002 and was at the time the largest operation in Afghanistan (Naylor, 2005). In the simplest of terms, Operation Anaconda was a success due to the number of casualties sustained by the enemy, however, in almost every other way the operation failed to accomplish its most basic objectives. According to Joint Publication 3-0, Joint Functions are broken down into six categories Command and Control, Intelligence, Fires, Movement and Maneuver, Protection, and Sustainment (U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, 2011). It is within these functions that the failures of the operation occurred, specifically within their role in the Joint Operation Planning Process (JOPP).…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Lieutenant Colonel Cohen had a bad case of hemorrhoids and was unable to lead the mission. Lieutenant Colonel Cohen’s operations officer, Captain Baum was appointed to lead the mission in his stead.5 Baum’s forces consisted of ten medium Sherman tanks, six recon light tanks, three self-propelled one-hundred five millimeter guns,…

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eisenhower clarified the concern that Fredendall did not add value in commanding II Corps. In clarifying the concern, a critical thinker must ensure that the problem or issue is not framed in a way that limits courses of action. However, Eisenhower’s lack of experience in high command is demonstrated by his hesitation to relieve Fredendall of command of II Corps. His judgment in this matter would later lead to the British having a negative point of view of the United States’ performance in its first significant effort at war.…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Operation Overload, as it was technically called, is the largest amphibious operation in history. It started on June 6th, 1944 in Normandy, France. Even with the extensive planning, General Norman Cota, a strong operational leader, warned his troops to expect the unexpected. There were minimal German forces defending the area, concluding that Operation Bodyguard had worked. 14,674 sorties(one round trip to target and back by plane) were flown in a mere 8 hours. During the invasion, Dwight D. Eisenhower, A five star general and later, the 34th president of the United States, talked in a broadcast to the people of German-occupied Europe promising their liberation. Strategy on D-Day was critically important to this massive invasion. For example, two bridges, called the Pegasus and Horsa bridges were key for German reinforcements to reach Normandy. The night before the attack, two gliders landed near these bridges, carrying a couple Allied soldiers. The soldiers easily defeated the German guards and captured the bridges. This prevented reinforcements from meeting the landing troops. Allied troops were dropped out of planes to capture the Merville battery. The anti-aircraft guns on the battery scared the pilots and the paratroopers were dropped too early and critical supplies like mortars, radios, and mine detectors were lost or too damaged to use. Even with these problems, the Allied troops ousted out the…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carson Loewe 7th-8th hour Mr. Thorne 6, March, 2015 D-Day “When pressure mounts and strain increase everyone begins to the weakness in his make up. It is up to the commander to conceal his; above all to conceal, doubt, fear, and distrust,” General D Eisenhower once said. On June 6, 1944, the Allies made on amphibians, radical decisions to invade and attack Normandy. D-Day was the turning point in World War 2, although it would not have been possible without the help of General D. Eisenhower. General David Dwight Eisenhower was a strong republican war official; helping create some of the war plans for the ambitions attack on Normandy.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Evaluate the view that Operation Barbarossa was the major turning point of the European War.…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Is D-Day Deception

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Army Group or (FUSAG), which was a fictitious group. Originally conceived in London during 1943 as a planning group for the Allied invasion of France that was placed under General Omar Bradley, which existed only on paper as part of Operation Quicksilver. Stationed directly across from Pas de Calais in the area of Dover in the southern England, this allowed the allies to spread even more deception throughout the German High Command and Intelligence community. While George Patton was placed in command of the 1st Army Group, Dwight D. Eisenhower increased the groups size to make it seem large than the British’s Twenty-first Army group which was led by Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery. This keep the Axis more interested in keeping an eye or sending agents to obtain the size and what the FUSAG was up to.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mission Command

    • 2076 Words
    • 9 Pages

    With German forces on the run following the Allied success at Normandy and the breakout and pursuit across France, Allied forces were staged to enter Germany in late summer 1944. Both Field Marshal Montgomery and General Bradley clamored to be given the priority of effort. General Eisenhower chose Montgomery’s Operation MARKET GARDEN as the plan for action. It called for airborne forces to open the route for a ground force to move more than sixty miles up a single road, ending up north of the Rhine River near Arnhem, Netherlands. By accomplishing this task, the German Ruhr industrial heartland would be within easy grasp. But the operation failed. The ground force did not make it to the last bridge; it was six more months before Allied forces crossed the Lower Rhine River near Arnhem. Between 17 and 26 September 1944, there were 17,000 Allied casualties including eighty percent of the 1st Airborne Division (UK). The historical evidence overwhelmingly shows that the British 1st Airborne Division lost the Battle of Arnhem because of poor planning. This paper will prove the failure of The Battle of Arnhem was not solely the fault of MG Roy Urquhart. Although this was his first command of such a division (being an "outsider") could he have not completed his wartime mission any better despite having inexperienced leaders planning airborne operations, bad intelligence, allowing the Air Force to plan the DZs based off what was best for the air movement plan and poor execution. This paper examines MG Urquhart, the commander of 1st Airborne Division (UK).…

    • 2076 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    "why did the Allies win?" For Overy, to ask such a question is to presuppose that there was nothing pre-ordained about Allied success (Overy pg 1). To understand the Allied victory, Overy asserts that we must realize that explanations of resources, technology, of fighting men, are not enough on their own to explain victory. The moral dimension to warfare, he asserts, is inseparable from any understanding of the outcome. The role of human agency is extensive. With this…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In just two months, Marshall promoted Eisenhower to the chief of the War Plans Division where he received his second general’s star. In June 1942, Marshall sent him to England on a special mission to build cooperation among the Allies as Commanding General, U.S. Army, European Theater.(Eisenhower Presidential Library and Museum) It is remarkable to think this guy was just spotted by General Marshall and in just 2 quick months he would be promoted to Chief of war plans. This really goes to show how good he was at his job that he was promoted so quickly while being admired by his peers. Starting in November 1942, Eisenhower headed Operation Torch, the cooperated Allied invasion of North Africa. He then coordinated the land and/or water capable attack of Sicily and the Italian terrain in 1943 that prompted to the fall of Rome in June 1944. Eisenhower was selected leader of the Allied Expeditionary Force in December of that year and given the obligation of initiating the arranged Allied invasion of Nazi-run Europe. On D-Day (June 6, 1944), more than 150,000 Allied strengths crossed the English Channel and raged the shorelines of Normandy; the intrusion prompted to the freedom of Paris on August 25 and handed the hold of the war over Europe conclusively in the Allied course. Having ascended from Lieutenant colonel in the Philippines to incomparable authority of the successful strengths in Europe in just five years, Eisenhower returned home to a legend's welcome in 1945 to fill in as head of staff of the U.S. Armed force.(Smith) A quote from Eisenhower that I really like because it can be related to many aspects of life is,“In preparing for battle I have always found that plans are useless. But planning is indispensable.(Eisenhower "National Defense Executive Reserve Conference").” This shows how hard of a hard worker…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The successful Allied victories in Normandy during World War II forced the rival Germans to retreat to the Netherlands. These events enabled the Allied Forces to attempt the largest airborne operation in history Operation Market Garden in an attempt to make a final push to permanently defeat the Germans and end World War II. Unfortunately, this plan was destined to fail from the beginning. Overzealous leadership planning, limited logistical support, bad weather, and poor intelligence all being contributing factors to the failure…

    • 1447 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introduce Topic: The Holocaust was a significant event in the 20th century and many debates still arise surrounding it. One such debate discusses the response of Allies to the Holocaust. Purpose
: Aims to explore the key reactions of the Allies, with particular emphasis on its failures or inaction.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays