One of his biggest opponents had been Dr. Stonehill himself, and trying to work with his unconventional methods. Their two differing views of science are one of the things that strain their relationship.
John Crowley views science as a means to an end, the way to save his kids. He will compromise and cut corners to get there. His views are completely subjective since he is guided by emotion, and cares only for the well-being of his children.
His partner, Dr. Stonehill, doesn’t care what the rules or the cause is, if he is hired, then he wants to do things his way. Unlike Crowley, he will not compromise, and spends more time with theories than results because of that. Though he seems to be “light years ahead of everyone,” he’s had little scientific recognition because of his inability to work with others and put his theories to test.
Personally, I feel that I relate most to Dr. Stonehill. While I’m not making any scientific breakthroughs, I tend to looking at situations more logically and objectively. I also prefer to do things my way, or a way I know well, rather than bending to do what others tell me. I, like Stonehill, have little patience for rules if I feel there’s not a good enough reason to follow them, and I never compromise with the enemy. While I admire Crowley’s love for his children, I don’t like kids much myself, and I don’t think I would have walked away from my job to pursue what could...