Preview

Explain Why The Voting Age Should Be Lowered To 16

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
747 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain Why The Voting Age Should Be Lowered To 16
Nat Marshall draft notes for English course work 12th Jan

Should the age at which people gain the right to vote be lowered to 16?

The right to vote is a very important human right. It gives us an opportunity to participate in the way democratic countries are governed. It gives us the opportunity to change governments we feel are failing to represent us and ensure that government pays attention the citizens. It could be argued that the right to vote is the most effective way other rights such as free speech and the right to a fair trial are protected.
If we look at history a century ago most countries did not let women vote, and it took years of struggle for them to win political rights. Fifty years ago South Africa and some states
…show more content…
Some countries including Taiwan and Japan do not allow young people the right to vote until they are 21. But in countries the voting age is younger.For example in Korea, Sudan and Indonesia it is 17, in Brazil, Cuba and Nicaragua it is 16, and in Iran it is as low as 15.In other democracies such as the UK, USA and Australia there are growing movements to lower the voting age to 16.
The reasons the age should be are reduced can be broken down in to five main points.

At 16 we are mature enough to make important decisions including who to vote for in local and general elections.Our bodies are fully formed,we have been educated for 12 years, and some of us have experience of working as well as attending school. All of this helps use develop political views and we should be allowed to put these across at election time. There is no significant or noticeable difference between a 16 year old and someone who is 18 I would say lots of us 16 year olds are as if not are more sensible than some 20 year
…show more content…
Currently we are not allowed to have a say on how the government spends our money or in how much tax they take from us. Along side this the government as set policies on things such as the minimum wages and the number of works hours people can work and if young people are old enough to have jobs we should be able to have our say in these areas too.

It is important in a democracy to include as wide a range of opinions as possible. The idea of representation by elected MPs and local councillors means that as many different views as possible should be heard at election time. Teenagers have their own interests and views which are currently not represented. This leads to feeling of being unvalued by society and a lose of trust in the way the country is governed.

There is a problem of apathy and a lack of interest in politics and this is evident in low turnouts on polling day. Although young people are taught citizenship at school, we don’t get a chance to put this knowledge into practice for many years as national elections are usually only held every four years or so, many people have to wait until they are 20 or 21 before their first chance to cast an important

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A debate has surfaced regarding the legal voting ages in Australia as to whether the voting age should be lowered to the age of 16. In response to this issue, Melissa Young, a 17-year-old girl, contends that the voting age should be lowered to 16 in her post on the website, youngpeopleunite.com. She conveys her message in an easy-going, colloquial manner but simultaneously presents her argument logically and systematically in her endeavour to appeal to teenage users of the website, most likely to be also part of the youth initiative. Young has posted up a photograph of young people casting their votes for a climate change related matter at Federation Square.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hensher states that usually only communist countries such as North Korea and the former Soviet Union lower the voting age due to no democratic control. Many times throughout the article, Hensher states that 16 year olds are usually too irresponsible. Hensher also states since they want to lower it to 16 why even have a minimum voting age. Hensher’s article is a useful source. Hensher’s article is different due to some of the points he stated such as, if 16 year olds will be able to vote why even have a minimum age? Hensher’s information is reliable though it is…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The governments “I don’t care attitude” towards young adults causes them to reject some of the politics, which causes them to lose their voice. Most of the…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1971 the united states ratified the 26th amendment to the constitution granting to vote at the age of 18 20 years old.The 26th amendment was the fastest to be ratified in U.S history.i think it should be lowered to 13 because 13 year olds should have a say.At 13 your a teenager so you…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the persuasive argument “16; The Right Voting Age”, the National youth Rights Association argued should able to vote. According to the author, “The National Academies, scientists who write the report for the government, state that 80% of 16- and 17 -year-olds work before graduation . . . teens have no say about the ways that tax money is spent ” (450). Basically, the author is saying teenagers can not say anything about the tax money is spent. I agree that teenagers can not decide what to do with the tax because my brother experience works a lot of time and he can not vote for tax confirmed it. Similarity, the author states “Youths become physically mature at an earlier age” (451). In other words, the author argues that the life teaches…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the 26th amendment was passed, it gave 18-year-olds the right to vote. Today, nearly thirty-five years later, the question has become "should 16-year-olds be allowed to vote?" Of course the general consensus of youth is for this option, yet a surprising amount of adults are supporting the movement as well. In order to understand why lowering the voting age would even be considered, it is necessary to examine why the 26th amendment was passed in the first place. The United States was in the throes of the Vietnam War and protests were underway throughout the nation. Draftees into the armed services were any male over the age of 18. These young men were allowed, even forced, to fight and die for their country, but they were unable to vote. The Congress attempted to right this wrong in 1970 by passing an extension to the 1965 Voting Rights Act that gave the vote to all persons 18 or older, in all elections, on all levels. The supporters of lowering the voting age to 16 are of course "piggy-backing" off of the basis for the 26th amendment. One supporter, Margot Adler, makes the comparison between fighting at age 18 to driving and other responsibilities given at 16, "16 year-olds can drive in most states; if they commit serious crimes, they are tried as adults. If they can be punished as adults, why don't they have the rights of adults? Despite the close vote in the recent presidential election, it appears that only about half the potential voters (51 percent) exercised their right to vote. That figure is only marginally better than it was a few years ago. According to official Census Bureau and Federal Election Commission figures, only 49 percent of those of voting age participated in the presidential election in 1996. This follows the trend of a steady decline in voting during the 20th Century, which began with a 75 percent turnout in the 1902 presidential election. American voting habits are particularly striking when compared with those of other democratic…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article, “No, We Shouldn't Lower the Voting Age to 16” by David Davenport, he states that the lowering of the voting age would negatively affect the country. I agree with Davenport, but he failed to mention the fact that teens lack the life experience, motivation and maturity to vote. Society talks about the age of maturity and responsibility, but they send many different messages. At age 16, teens are allowed to drive and work, but they aren't allowed to vote. At age 18, young adults are allowed to serve and die for their country, but aren't allowed to drink.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article Takoma Park 16-year-old savors his history making moment at the polls by Annys Shin it talks about the proposal of letting 16 year olds to vote. I believe they shouldn't be allowed to vote. They shouldn't be allowed simply because most 16 year olds do not really care about politics, nothing motivates them to vote and even 18 year olds have low voter turnouts. The 16 year olds I know do not care about politics that much either.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    26th Amendment

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The extended debate on lowering the voting age from 21 to 18 first started during World War II and escalated sharply during the Vietnam War. The phrase “old enough to fight, old enough to vote” is traced back to the WWII decision to lower the draft age to 18, meaning the majority of those drafted lacked the right to vote.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, American citizens should be required to vote because records can be kept and the population can be better observed, such as a census taken of the population every decade. The American population, like a census, would keep a better count on how much the population is increasing and decreasing. If American citizens were required to vote, the government would be able to…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people claim lowering the voting age will help, but in reality it won’t. They say that it will increase younger voters. But 16 yr olds aren’t going to vote without a knowledge of politics. They also claim that the country needs more voters. The problem with that is you are putting the responsibility of much greater power than 16 yr olds can handle into their hands. Who knows what they’ll do with it!…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jane Goodall once stated, along these lines, that each person makes a difference but it’s up to that person what type of difference they want to make. Young people these days are put into the category that they cannot make a difference, they are belittled and made out to be careless. In turn these young people start to believe that they can’t make a difference therefore they don’t bother trying. This affect is seen in youth in their involvement in politics, the voting rate in Canada for youth voters has been declining for years according to Elections Canada , young adults therefore don’t appear all that interested in politics.…

    • 1964 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vote Persuasive Speech

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Oh sixteen. That magical age that we fervently look forward to, imagining the the new found freedoms that are to greet us..The age of going to parties every friday, driving our friends around in a shiny new Toyota Prius, and finally having our parents not breathing down our necks every second. There are so many responsibilities and freedoms that are given when one turns 16, but there is on crucial power that we are not entrusted with. The vote. While many countries around the world have lowered their voting age, Canada remains a country that has not. Teenage suffrage is a controversial issue that has created many a debate throughout the years. Both adults and students remain divided in their opinions on the voting age.But when deeply considering this issue, it is easy to see that lowering the vote can make a positive impact on Canada by…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Age has been a requirement for voting since the inception of democracy. The 28th amendment lowered the age from 21 to 18 in 1971, and this improved the voice of this demographic in all elections. The balancing act of the rights of the citizen versus the responsibility of the citizens sometimes faces question of definition. For a democracy to function many things need to work in a cohesive manner and representation of the younger population segments is an important aspect, and allowing voting rights would help include the younger citizens. “In 1996 the state lower Saxony in Germany lowered its voting age for local election, more 16 and 17 year olds turned out to vote in the election then those 18 to 24.” This democratizing step allows the…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Before I researched the topic, I was against it, but seeing several of advantages of the policy changed my mind. I believe that 16-years-olds should have the right to vote because they are given adult responsibilities, but no rights. If someone is expected to pay taxes, they should be able to have a say in who leads their country. I also believe that 16-year-olds will be mature enough to vote. (Campaign). An excerpt from youthrights.org highlights this topic of qualification by saying, “With the voting age at 16 there is the opportunity for new voters to have a greater opportunity to be educated voters as most are in high school. When the voting age is lowered schools will most likely schedule a civics class to coincide with 16 that will introduce the issues and prepare new voters. It stands to reason that these young voters will be better prepared to vote than their elders.” This means that 16-year-olds are more qualified to vote than a good chunk of the adult population. That idea in itself scares people because it means that if younger citizens are more qualified than them, that they are “better” than them. This mainly comes from a conservative point-of-view in which we don’t want anything to change. People might also argue that, “If we lower the age to 16, then why don’t lower it to 12 or 10 or 8?” This idea comes from a scared society afraid of change, because they think it will “ruin” the government. The simple fact is that, there are no wrong votes. Adults and elders can vote for the “wrong” candidate just as much as teenagers…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays