Preview

Explain Why The Parliament Should Not Be Compulsory

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
133 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain Why The Parliament Should Not Be Compulsory
Challenging the Parliamentary Sovereignty was not the purpose for which the HRA was designed. In Hansard Lord Irvine stated: ‘The sovereignty of Parliament should not be disturbed.’ As such, from a technical point of view in appears that the terms in which the HRA is drafted does not conflict with the parliamentary sovereignty. But does that mean that the qualification of parliamentary sovereignty is like what Dicey explained in reality? Does the Parliamentary Sovereignty integrate the HRA as an inferior agreement?
Various different positions have developed for this question. Is the HRA admitted exceptionally as an implied repeal? Has there been development of an exception to the implied repeal by the common law? It becomes more difficult

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The British government during the 1700's consisted of the king, who was the head of state and Ministers from the landed gentry who often gained their seats through corrupt methods.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Another strength of the UK constitution is that there is sovereignty of Parliament. This is a strength as its elected body is accountable to the people. For example, MP’s are elected by the people whop stand in Parliament, which therefore means that the people in power have the general publics support to make decisions. But the nature of our constitution means that the location of sovereignty is a bit of a muddle.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tim Schouls in his essay, “Why Group Representation in Parliament Is Important,” argues that the parliamentary representation in Canada is unfair because it doesn’t represent Canada’s social diversity as a whole. He believes that democracy in Canada can be considerably deepened and enhanced when the composition of the House of Commons substantially reflects the social diversity of Canada (for example, Aboriginals, ethnic minorities, visible minorities, gays etc.) instead of geographical diversity (constituencies). He asserts there’s a big change taking place in Canadian politics; attachment to geography, language, and religion are becoming less important to Canadians while attachments to ethnicity and gender are becoming…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Parliamentary gives Parliament superior and legal authority as they can make or unmake any Act of Parliament they wish and although the House of Commonsâ has most of the dominance they always need the support of the House of Lords to pass an Act. Parliamentary sovereignty refers to this joint power. The Human Rights Act 1998 is a law passed by Parliament that has limited the application of parliamentary sovereignty as it is made unlawful for any public body to act in a way which is incompatible with the Convention although the courts can only make a declaration.…

    • 525 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    C) To what extent is the House of Commons effective in carrying out its various functions?…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The UK currently has a system of Parliament whereby there are two chambers who can pass or reject (or, in the House of Lords just delay) bills. The House of Commons is a fully elected chamber and it is made up of representatives from different areas in the United Kingdom. However, the House of Lords is made up of people who have earned the right of being a Lord through merit. They also have a number of hereditary peers (although there will no longer be any hereditary peers appointed. There have been many calls to make the House of Lords into an elected chamber as people say that the fact that it is unelected reduces the democracy of the United Kingdom and that it is unfair to have an unelected as the peers may not actually represent the views of the people.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The old "taxation without representation" argument said it all. Colonists were tired of having things like taxes passed onto them in Parliament all the way out in England without any representation. It was as if they were being treated like second class citizens who had no say in their own rights within the colonies. But instead of listening to its citizens, England decided to clamp down even further on the colonies, sparking even more grievances. The war was the result of the political American Revolution. Colonists galvanized around the position that the Stamp Act of 1765, imposed by Parliament of Great Britain, was unconstitutional. The British Parliament insisted it had the right to tax colonists. The colonists claimed that, as they were…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sovereignty is in essence ultimate and unchallengeable power, in the UK sovereignty in theory lies within parliament, A.V. Dicey said that ‘no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having a right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament’. Sovereignty was placed formally to parliament after the Bill of Rights act in 1688 when the monarch’s powers were removed. Ultimate power lies in parliament due to the fact that the electorate vote for the members of parliament in free, fair and regular elections. Two types of sovereignty exist, legal and political. Legal sovereignty is the principle that one body has the authority and right to change any law in anyway it wants to, legal sovereignty in the UK has been said to lie in Westminster Parliament. Political sovereignty is where power effectively and actively is used and implemented, in other words who holds political power and who has can influence it. For example, political sovereignty lies with the electorate at election time, but at other times lies with parliament when debating legislation and constitutional statues.…

    • 1577 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    influences on parliament

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pressure groups are organisations of people who believe in the same cause. They have strongly held views and wish to influence some aspect of society. Groups of people working together usually have more effect than individuals. Pressure groups have the right to criticise the government, hold meetings, protest and make their views known by using the media. They have the responsibility to base their criticisms on facts and their meetings should be peaceful and legal. They should inform local authorities and the police when they’re making a protest. They also have the responsibility not to intimidate other people. Pressure groups use a variety of methods such as the internet, letters, lobbying, petitions, demonstrations and mass media campaigns. An example of a pressure group is Greenpeace (campaigns on environmental issues).…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With democracy on the incline and other countries catching up to where the UK once lead it can be argued that parliament does not carry out its functions adequately. Many would say there are not enough checks and balances on the government to insure its parliament is run legitimately being argued that a cross on a ballot paper every four years is hardly a true expression of our will. Current circumstances have lead to his enquiry of the people, most significantly the freedom of information act 2000 introduced by Blair’s government allowing transparency and putting the government under some scrutiny resulted in the daily telegraphy uncovering the expense scandal, including the duck house this exploitation of the government sparked an unanimous felling of not only anger but also disappointment bringing the questioning of the effectiveness of parliament. However not all of parliament can be looked upon in negative light, parliament can be seen as efficient and it is unfair to claim that “none” of its functions are adequate because the surely there would be a collapse in parliament and government.…

    • 1616 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of mandatory voting during U.S. elections is a much-debated topic in the United States. Making voting mandatory for all citizens, is debated to be something that could be either positive or negative. Both sides of the issue have their reasons why mandatory-voting laws should or should not be passed.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 2016 election of the United States, only about 55.4% percent of Americans voted, the lowest turnout in twenty years. Voting is in fact one of the biggest parts of democracy, sadly though, many people do not. In effort to increase voter turnouts countries have started making voting mandatory while others have not. Should America enforce a compulsory, or mandatory, voting system? There are three reasons why Americans should not be required to vote: most countries don’t require citizens to vote, countries with compulsory voting systems have higher satisfaction rates, and uninformed voters can be dangerous.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Currently, the 672,000 tax paying residents of D.C. do not have a voice in congress. Do you think that's fair? Having no vote on federal decisions that impact your life? According to mayor Muriel Bowser, “D.C. residents pays billions of dollars each and every year [...] yet we have no vote in the house.” There is a reason why D.C.’s license plates says “taxation without representation.” Residents are forced to shell out for federal taxes but yet have no member of congress there to fight on their behalf. People living in D.C. lack of full voting rights. They have no right to even participate what happens in their own city. According to a video on Washington Post, “residents now pay more in federal taxes than get back in federal services.” According…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    America has all types of standards, and expectations bestowed upon you at birth, when you get older you have to pay taxes, attend some form of school, jury duty, all types of stuff that you have no say in. however there is now a debate of whether you should have a choice in if you can choose to not vote, which makes no sense seeing as our rights as human beings include our right to choose, not to become essentially a slave to our government. I believe that you should be able to choose if youd like to vote or not, just like you get to choose who you woukd vote for, or even what you want to wear or eat.these are just rights given to you. Americans have freedoms we sometimes dont even realize until they are being threatend.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the United States of America, we consider voting to be an obvious right that everyone deserves. It is a part of our lifestyle and crucial in our government. Despite its importance, voting is not mandatory for American citizens. Only after becoming a registered voter, any United States citizen over the age of 18 can cast their ballot for who they want in positions of power within the government. Those who want to vote are able to, and several accommodations are provided for people who find themselves incapable of making it to the polls on Election Day. Without voters, our government would be unable to function properly. Compulsory voting should be put into effect in the United States, because over public awareness of politics would increase, the power of separate political parties will decrease, and the election results will reflect the public’s true opinion.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays