Preview

Explain The Rules Of Statutory Interpre

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
168 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain The Rules Of Statutory Interpre
In this task I will explain the rules of statutory interpretation.

Statutory interpretation
Statutory interpretation is the act or process of interpreting and applying legislation. Statutory Interpretation is the process of reading and applying statutory laws, and judges trying to find out the intention of parliament when passing the law. Sometimes the words of a statute have a plain and straightforward meaning. But in most cases, there is some ambiguity or vagueness in the words of the statute that must be resolved by the judge.
Judges in England generally apply three basic rules of statutory interpretation, and similar rules are also used in other common law jurisdictions. The literal rule, the golden rule and the mischief rule
Literal rule
This rule explains what the law is rather than explaining what the law means. In literal rule, the words in a statute are given its plain, ordinary, and literal meaning. While applying the literal rule, the law is read word by word and without diverting from its true meaning.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    TMA 1 W200

    • 1435 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are four main sources of law in England and Wales are legislation, judge-made law and European Union (EU) law and human rights law. This essay will look at the difference sources of English law (as highlighted above) and explain the relative importance of each source with particular reference to case law, and conclude whether the view articulated by your friend is correct.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Common Law decisions are usually decided by judges and there is no specific guideline for each case, there are only general guidelines and each case is decided by the judge.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tutorial Questions Week 3

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. When interpreting legislation, the Courts use several approaches to aid their interpretation. Describe how the literal, golden and mischief rules of interpretation operate.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    2. Are there any established statutory hooks allowing judges to modify custody arrangement when facts have changed?…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are four different rules judges can use when interpreting Acts of Parliament. The literal rule is when judges have to take the natural, ordinary or dictionary meaning of a word or phrase and apply it to the case in hand. This rule leads to absurd and unjust results. The literal rule occurred in LNER V Berriman case. An Act made it a duty to provide a look-out man wherever a railwayman was ‘repairing or relaying’ the track. His employer didn’t provide him with a look-out man and Mr Berriman was killed by a train. Mr Berriman’s widow claimed compensation, but was unsuccessful. The courts applied the literal rule and the words ‘repairing and relaying’ did not cover oiling points since this was merely maintaining the line.…

    • 8745 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law Legt1710

    • 25471 Words
    • 102 Pages

    1. Enacted (Statute) Law: law that is made by parliament. It can be changed by parliament but is interpreted by judges. In the case of a conflict between statue and common law, statue law prevails under the Doctrine of Parliamentary Supremacy as it has the ultimate law making power. The parliament can authorize other bodies to make laws called delegated legislation. Delegated legislation is often made without public or parliament debate. To safeguard delegated legislation, it can be reviewed by courts and is still controlled by the parliament…

    • 25471 Words
    • 102 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Statutory provision is legal care that has to be available by law. This law states that all children between the ages of 5-16 should be educated. Children aged 3-4 also have an entitlement to education/childcare. 2 year olds can also be eligible in some cases however they will receive fewer hours. School is an example of statutory care.…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, statutory provision consists of services legally required by statute (Dictionary.com, 2016), such as the NHS, Gwynedd Social Services and Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board (class notes, 2016). On the other hand, voluntary provision refers to non-profit, voluntary organisations that offer optional services to the public (Merriam-Webster, 2016), and some examples include the NSPCC, RVS and Age Cymru (class notes, 2016). Lastly, private provision involves private, independent services that function for profit (Oxford Dictionaries, 2016), such as the Royal Mail or Aba Care (class notes, 2016).…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When this view of language is applied to legal interpretation, it may now be argued that there is no law whose meaning is “clear” and calls only for application. Words may have several literal meanings and readers only choose “the meaning” within the context of a particular sentence. This process of choosing the “literal” meaning is but an interpretation of the text.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rules are entirely judge made and thus flexible, open-ended and subject to a variety of applications as the circumstances of each case permits. Following a number of cases that illustrated the uncertainties in the law, the House of Lords in Pye v Graham (2003) sought to codify the principles…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Statutory Law Essay

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    the House and Senate, getting the required votes to pass it, and then having it signed into law by the Governor or President. For example, the right against self-incrimination is statutory law because it was written into the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Statutory Interpretation

    • 2457 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Supreme Court has expressed an interest “that Congress be able to legislate against a background of clear interpretive rules, so that it may know the effect of the language it adopts.” This report identifies and describes some of the more important rules and conventions of interpretation that the Court applies. Although this report focuses primarily on the Court’s methodology in construing statutory text, the Court’s approach to reliance on legislative history are also briefly described. In analyzing a statute’s text, the Court is guided by the basic principle that a statute should be read as a harmonious whole, with its separate parts being interpreted within their broader statutory context in a manner that furthers statutory purpose. The various canons of interpretation and presumptions as to substantive results are usually subordinated to interpretations that further a clearly expressed congressional purpose. The Court frequently relies on “canons” of construction to draw inferences about the meaning of statutory language. For example, in considering the meaning of particular words and phrases, the Court distinguishes between terms of art that may have specialized meanings and other words that are ordinarily given a dictionary definition. Other canons direct that all words of a statute be given effect if possible, that a term used more than once in a statute should ordinarily be given the same meaning throughout, and that specific statutory language ordinarily trumps conflicting general language. “Ordinarily” is a necessary caveat, since any of these “canons” gives way if context reveals an evident contrary meaning. Not infrequently the Court stacks the deck, and subordinates the general, linguistic canons of statutory…

    • 2457 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For Literal Rule, the judges will only look at the grammatical meaning of words to interpret. If the words are clear and unambiguous, even though the result makes nonsense of the law, they must be followed. In R v Judge of the City of London Court (1892), Lord Esher said “If the words of an Act are clear, then you must follow them, even though they lead to manifest absurdity. The court has nothing to do with the question whether the legislature has committed an absurdity”. Fisher v Bell(1960) gave us an good example. It is an offence to offer for sale flick knives to public. The defendant had flick knife on display in shop window with price label. But the defendant was not found guilty as displaying the knife was merely an “invitation to treat” but not an “offer”.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    W100 Tma02

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There are four main sources of law in England, those being parliament, the Judiciary courts, European law, and ECHR which is the European Convention of Human Rights.…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kiernan demonstrates one of the common approaches that can be taken when acts or statutes are being interpreted in this jurisdiction, namely the literal rule.The literal rule is a means of interpreting legislation whereby the wording or ordinary meaning of the legislation is paramount. Furthermore, this case is important for practioners of the law as it shows how even a minor technicality such as a minor mistake in the wording of legislation can…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics