Explain How Effective Was The National Congress Under The Articles Of Confederation
U.S History Essay
Ann
2. How effective was the national Congress under the Articles of Confederation? Why were the Articles replaced by the Constitution? How was the federal government different under the Constitution?
After the Revolutionary War, originators of the Articles of Confederation had checked that the federal government could never do rob power from the each individual state. The outcome was that the national Congress was very weak and even politically weak which make them not to keep national unity and went almost bankrupt. The specter of rebellion and collapse forced American elites to make a stronger and more centralized government under the Constitution.
During 1777, America’s politicians were well informed that powerful governments could become harsh and cruel. As most people know, in the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson had highlighted King George III’s “long train of abuses” against …show more content…
The new federal government was divided into three individual but the same branches, each with obvious powers and authority. The new bicameral Congress was given the power to tariff taxes, during the president was given the authority to put to death and impose congressional laws. The Supreme Court estimated the task of judicial review to discover whether Congress’s laws were constitutional. Therefore, though the Constitution gave the new government greater power and authority, it also instituted protection to keep federal power in check, as the framers of the Articles of Confederation had initially target.
There were changes in the American for example, the articles of confederation replaced by the constitution. It could help to develop the Unite States. Also through this essay, I can know many effective and difference between federal government and constitution. These are very helpful to grow the Unite
Ann
2. How effective was the national Congress under the Articles of Confederation? Why were the Articles replaced by the Constitution? How was the federal government different under the Constitution?
After the Revolutionary War, originators of the Articles of Confederation had checked that the federal government could never do rob power from the each individual state. The outcome was that the national Congress was very weak and even politically weak which make them not to keep national unity and went almost bankrupt. The specter of rebellion and collapse forced American elites to make a stronger and more centralized government under the Constitution.
During 1777, America’s politicians were well informed that powerful governments could become harsh and cruel. As most people know, in the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson had highlighted King George III’s “long train of abuses” against …show more content…
The new federal government was divided into three individual but the same branches, each with obvious powers and authority. The new bicameral Congress was given the power to tariff taxes, during the president was given the authority to put to death and impose congressional laws. The Supreme Court estimated the task of judicial review to discover whether Congress’s laws were constitutional. Therefore, though the Constitution gave the new government greater power and authority, it also instituted protection to keep federal power in check, as the framers of the Articles of Confederation had initially target.
There were changes in the American for example, the articles of confederation replaced by the constitution. It could help to develop the Unite States. Also through this essay, I can know many effective and difference between federal government and constitution. These are very helpful to grow the Unite