Preview

Executive Order 12333: National Intelligence

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
541 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Executive Order 12333: National Intelligence
The executive order, signed by President Reagan in December 4, 1981 it permits government intelligence agencies to monitor certain content without a court order or warrant by having some relationship with foreign organizations or persons and adjusted commonly since, is the power depended upon by the knowledge organizations, including the NSA, to lead surveillance of foreigners outside of the United States. As indicated by late reports, on the other hand, the government depends upon the executive order to spy on the international communications of countless Americans and it gather billions of records and it also collects Telephone calls, emails and electronic communications, the NSA relies on Executive Order 12333. These spied communications …show more content…
Executive order 12333 has been corrected three times. It was revised by Executive order13284 on January 23, 2003 and was then altered by Executive order 13555 on August 27, 2004. Executive order 13555 was subtitled "strengthened Management of the Intelligence Community" . Executive order 13555 somewhat supplemented and superseded Executive order 12333. On July 30, 2008, President George W. Bush signed Executive order 13470, which further supplemented and superseded Executive order 12333 to strength the part of the Director of National Intelligence. Executive order 12333 often serves an alternate basis of authority for surveillance activities. Executive order12333 is divided into three sections. The first part is the bulk of the order, describing the overall goals, directions, duties, and responsibilities of U.S. intelligence efforts. The second part applies to the genuine behavior of knowledge exercises and incorporates a disallowance on death. The third part comprises of general procedures and incorporates general definitions, execution, and the requirements of consistence with congressional oversight. Under Executive order 12333, while the National Security Agency still can't individually target U.S. persons and collect information from their phone calls, it is not required to delete such content if it is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This did nothing to stop the NSA, they continued to work in secret listening in without any restrictions or laws with the idea that it was to better the people. The Electronic Frontier foundation states that in 2005 the NSA was collecting data from major communications companies which violate the privacy safeguards put in by the U.S. congress and constitution. The EFF has been able to collect information through whistle blowers and in 2013 the media articles proving the reports of 2005 showing the government got everything that passed through all domestic fiber optic cables, the excuse once caught was under the Patriot act the government can collect any information they deem necessary for national security. Is it national security or national…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Act, aimed at updating both the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 and the Electronics Communications Privacy Act of 1986 is composed of 10 titles all of which were hurried through Congress on October 24th, 2001 and passed the senate the following day, “…with little deliberation. Unlike a typical statute, neither the House of Representatives nor the Senate issued a report on the PATRIOT act.” (Standler, 2007-2008, p. 4) To this day, the Patriot Act remains controversial; its supporters uphold it as a requirement for The War on Terrorism and for the enforcement of modern electronic communications law. The Act’s critics cite its numerous infringements on civil and individual rights. Title II, considered the most controversial, deals directly with surveillance, wiretapping, and computer fraud. Title II also details sanctions placed on trade with the Taliban, Syria and North Korea. The Patriot Act’s Title II, Enhanced Surveillance Procedures is a breach of privacy and infringes upon the tenants of our Fourth Amendment rights.…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truman Dbq Analysis

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While the executive order and executive privilege were introduced with good intentions, many believe that the latter was abused—especially during Richard Nixon’s presidency, however, this argument is and can be solely based off of a biased perspective. While in “Nixon’s Address to the Nation on his Secret Tape Recordings”, from 1974, which is a moderately strong document due to its author being a former president (the validity suffers because Nixon is biased in favor of himself), it can be seen that the president had a reason behind his controversial actions: “Ever since the existence of the White House taping system was first made known last summer, I have tried vigorously to guard the privacy of the tapes. I have been well aware that my effort to protect the confidentiality of Presidential conversations has heightened the sense of mystery about Watergate and, in fact, has…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2001, people are quick to dismiss the idea of an internment of American citizens, suggesting that the country has come a long way from 1942. The hypothesis that the government might conduct surveillance or use illegal wiretaps to monitor groups or individuals that it suspects of domestic terrorism seemed foreign before September 11th, and now has become a way to gain more information about potential suspects. These new measures, included in the USA Patriot Act, delicately trace the line between national security and civil liberties. A brief look at how the Bush…

    • 522 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    NSA paper

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The National Security Agency has been collecting the phone records of all U.S. citizens—which numbers have called which other numbers, when, and for how long—in an enormous database. The government says this mass collection is OK because the database is “queried”—i.e., searched—only under court supervision. In theory, this two-tiered approach, with judicial scrutiny applied at the query stage rather than the collection stage, is defensible. But does the judiciary—in this case, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court—really examine the database queries?…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Back in the beginning stages of the War on Terrorism, President Bush enacted the Patriot Act. This allowed the government to spy on citizens, monitoring their activities in order to discern whether or not someone is a terrorist. It brought about changes in law enforcement that allowed agencies to search phones, financial records, etc.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutely, many people only focus on certain section of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). The key word in conducting electronic surveillance is “illegal”. 1 For example, prior to and during the Edward Snowden case the person(s) directly involved assumed that the conduct of the NSA and CIA was unwarranted and illegal. If we examine some of the actions taken by NSA or CIA operatives involved, a task was given by higher command, which was completed. In some instances, the purpose of a task is not fully explained to the operative or the public. So, the question is did the operative comment something illegal? Was the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 violated? Not fully knowing of or seeing a FISA court order the actions…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The government should worry citizens, by hiring people to hack into their lives. The National Security Agency, NSA, is “inside” everything from phones to major websites like Google and Yahoo. The NSA is responsible for code breaking and getting information from phones and the internet. The NSA has headquarters in the United Kingdom as well. They try to focus overseas instead of domestically to prevent any serious crime and to defend the UK’s economic interest. Because the NSA doesn’t trust its own U.S. citizens, violates the fourth amendment, and made programs to “hack” us, the NSA invades the privacy of citizens and should be stopped.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the investigations of 9/11, the republican government under the presidency of George W. Bush came up with measures to solve the shortcomings of national security. Within a fort night after the terrorist attacks, George W. Bush announced the formation of the office of Homeland security developed to protect US territories from terrorist attacks and offer efficient and effective emergency and intelligence response to potential future natural disasters. The President signed Executive Order 13228 on October 8, 2001 setting up this office with the mission of developing and coordinating the implementation of a detailed national security strategy to prevent the United States from suffering another terrorist attacks…

    • 783 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Well the USA Patriot Act was signed into law during the Bush administration. That’s George W. Bush Sr. that I’m talking about. According to the author of A Gift of Fire, Sara Baase, the USA Patriot Act “(passed after the terrorist attacks in 2001) eased government access to many kinds of personal information, including library and financial records, without a court order.” An internet search will tell you that the USA Patriot Act is “An Act: To deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled.” The events of 9/11 brought about this change, had the government had this access maybe the events of that horrific day could have been avoided or halted before so many lives were…

    • 2093 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government is not spending enough time and resource in surveillance, which is resulting in the threats and decrease of national security. Surveillance is the act of observing, or monitoring a person. Monitoring a person can include the use of cameras, wiretaps, GPS tracking, and internet surveillance. Events such as the Oklahoma City bombing, and the attack on 9/11 lead to a law former President Bush passed. "On October 26th, 2001, Bush signed into law the USA Patriot Act." (Podesta) Government surveillance is an essential part of everyday life because not only does it keep the country under control, but ensures safety for Americans.…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Patriot Act

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bush created the law known as the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act is another tool used to prevent terriost attacks. This law basically gives the United States government the right to view private information. This law was and is a very controversial topic, but this law has prevented many terriost attacks.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    4th Amendment

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Section 218 of the Patriot Act amends FISA to provide that foreign intelligence need not be the purpose of investigations seeking orders under the Act, but merely a significant purpose. The amendment applies both to FISA electronic surveillance warrants and FISA warrants for physical searches of property. This greatly expands the power of federal authorities to apply the relatively loose standards of FISA to investigations of both U.S. citizens and residents that only peripherally touch on national…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States was attacked in an unforgettable brutally violent way. Many Americans lost their lives in a couple of hours. In the wake of the terrorist attacks, Congress passed a law called Patriot Act. The purpose of the Patriot Act is to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world. The Patriot Act enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and some of which to strengthen U.S. military defense in measures to prevent another attack from the terrorist. The Act allows federal officials to have a greater authority in tracking and intercepting communications, both for purposes of law enforcement and foreign gathering information to require all appropriate communication to stop…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Developed “to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes” the USA Patriot Act, bears the formal name ‘‘Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA Patriot Act, 2001, p. 1). Heretofore referred to as the “Patriot Act” the USA Patriot Act was signed into law within 6 weeks from initial draft to final approval supporting the enforcement of laws for the ultimate protection of the United States and her citizens by granting access to persons and information with liberal criminal and civil procedure exceptions. The Patriot Act immediately granted broad-based interrogation, surveillance and isolation abilities to law enforcement when investigating “crimes against terror” (US Government, 2011)…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays