Preview

Examples Of A Consensual Encounter

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
363 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examples Of A Consensual Encounter
A Consensual Encounter is when an officer approaches the person for conversation and are free to not answer any questions. In a Consensual Encounter, the officer cannot detain someone without having “reasonable suspicion”. For Example, If an officer approaches you to say, “Hello” continuing on by asking what your name, address, or date of birth is; one may ask, “Am I Free to Leave?” If the officer says yes, the person could leave the conversation. The Plain View Doctrine is explained by an officer who has been given the right to be on the premises. The Official has the authorization to search and seizure anything in plain sight. The Law Enforcement Official can make arrests based on the evidence seen in “plain view” and can obtain a warrant

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ken Krooks Case Study

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Under what is known as the Plain View Doctrine is called a search-related plain view, referring to items that are identified by the responding officer who was authorized to specifically search for it. In this particular case, the officer was authorized to search for a white, 6’0 tall individual who was wearing a black baseball cap, black t-shirt, and jeans. Even though this description is vague, this individual was in the area of the crime, did match the description, and acted merely suspicious in the officer’s presence. This initially identification is where the detention had occurred in this particular case. The plain view doctrine also states that an officer has the ability to make a warrantless seizure of an object that is involved in a crime if the officer can identify the object in plain view (Terry v. Ohio,…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dlk Case Study

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A search is trying to find something by looking carefully and a seizure is taking your belongings. The police officers already has suspicion about DLK growing marijuana and taking the time to obtain a warrant would only less the chance of winning the case. The suspect, when searching his home, was found growing more than 100 marijuana plants which was never shown on the thermal imager because the thermal imager doesn’t show any parts of the home, it just detects where the heat is escaping from the exterior of the home (Doc C). The law enforcement already had…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    powerful evidence of a crime that is occurring it seems obvious that they would want to act on that evidence without having to take the time to get a warrant. Courts have ruled that a warrant…

    • 987 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dlk Case Analysis

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Document A provides an overview of a precedent case, Carroll v. United States, where it was decided that in the situation that evidence could be destroyed or hidden, it is constitutional to conduct a search without a warrant. The overview described the case saying “federal agents believed Carroll was selling liquor...they saw him driving...and pulled him over…they searched his car finding liquor and arrested him.” Although this case is in fact different from DLK v. United States, it mirrors one idea, law enforcement took action without a warrant. In DLK v. United States, the federal agents suspected DLK was growing marijuana in his home. However, because there was not sufficient evidence to obtain a warrant “the imager [was a reasonable way] for law enforcement to gather information without … a search warrant” (Document E). Using thermal imaging in this case was a permitted means of collecting information and is summarized well with Justice John Paul Stevens’s statement in Document F, “[t]he officers’ conduct did not amount to a search and was perfectly…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    be searched, and the persons or things to be seized (Cornell University Law School, No Date).” The first part of this section states that no warrant will be given unless there is probable cause that will lead the judge or magistrate to believe that there is a very good reason to invade the privacy of a citizen. If there is not enough evidence for the judge to justify the signing of a search warrant, then the officer needs to try and find more evidence that will bolster his or her case.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    An officer cannot retrieve a search or arrest warrant based on their belief or suspicion. An application for a warrant must be supported by a sworn, detailed statement made by a law enforcement officer appearing before a neutral judge or magistrate. Probable cause must exist and the facts must provide a reasonably trustworthy basis that a crime has been committed or about to happen. Probable cause can also come from reliable police informants even though those statements cannot be tested by a magistrate. Along with probable cause, a warrant must also “particularly” describe the…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Probable Cause

    • 2409 Words
    • 10 Pages

    This paper discusses the underlying circumstances to obtaining a warrant, and proving probable cause. Certain exceptions are made by law in some situations, such as searching vehicles. All officers of the law, and court officials are legally obligated to follow all rights reserved by the Fourth Amendment, and without doing so they could jeopardize their case. Investigation must take place before an officer can prove probable cause to a judge, and obtain a warrant. Warrants are necessary documents in apprehending suspects, conducting searches, and seizures. Without warrants, in most cases, evidence will be ruled as inadmissible. There are several ways to prove probable cause to obtain warrants. Without sufficient probable cause a warrant can not be issued to officers.…

    • 2409 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The lawful arrest search incident is not restrictive to the issuance of a warrant. This means that if a person gets lawfully arrested, then the police have every right to search the person’s surrounding which is reach of the police.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    1. The officer’s observation of the evidence must be lawful, meaning the officer had a legal right to be at the location, or the suspect did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the location,…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The police often stop and search people which are suspected to have stolen or prohibited articles in possession. The power to do this comes from the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 which indicated “a constable may search a person or vehicle in public for stolen or prohibited articles” (Elliott and Quinn, 2011, 374). The police must follow a procedure when they are to stop and search a suspect. First of all they cannot stop and search at random; they must have reasonable grounds for the search. Before the search they must then identify themselves and the station they are based at as well as the grounds for the search. If the police officers do not do this the defendant can appeal on the basis that the search was unlawful as highlighted in the case R v Bristol where the search carried out under of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 was unlawful given that it had not complied with the requirements under of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. It followed that the defendant was not guilty of intentionally obstructing a search under the 1971 Act” (All England reporter, 2007)…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    · Physical Searches - the physical search of a person or their belongings may be warranted in the event of a reasonable belief suggesting violation of company rules and regulations or unlawful activity.…

    • 1493 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The criminal justice system works in such a way that certain behavior or actions are legislated as a criminal offense wherein the state or the federal government can prosecute an offender even if only being suspected. In this case, there exists rules or limits into which protection are of highest concerns. It does not only apply to civilian suspects but also extends to actual prisoners, and to those who are on parole and under probation. But in reality, it has become a worldwide issue in terms of illegal searches. It has even been stipulated in the U.S. Constitution 's Bill of Rights stating that these restrictions start on the premises of the rights to refuse to testify against oneself, the right to confront one 's accuser and the right to a trial by jury for people charged with crimes. But these federal protections may not always seem to hold especially when police enforcers are dealing with prisoners, people on parole and on probation status. This happens because the jurisdictions regarding these matters depend on the ruling court. The court regulates and decides whether the legislative rule, court practice or police action is permissible under the federal and state constitutional law. From here, we can say during the course of searches, we should be aware and vigilant of possible violations by the apprehending police officers. In such cases, knowledge of the legality, technicality and the law should at least be required or at least explained to the person being searched. As mentioned a while ago, the case becomes quite sensitive for people who are imprisoned, on parole and under probation. The situation for them is very difficult in the sense that they are…

    • 2812 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is common for a search to be defined as any action by government officials, which involves seeking for indication of a violation of law. Nonetheless, according to the Court’s cases, a search ensues when there is a physical invasion into one of the “constitutionally protected areas” which can be associated with the Fourth Amendment: persons, papers and effects (Whitebread and Slobogin, 120). Silverman vs United States (1961) exemplify how searches have conditions. Evidence officers gathered by eavesdropping on…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the criminal justice system a police officer or crime scene investigator cannot legally search a person or property without a search warrant. There have been ongoing debates and revisions on the legal requirements and circumstances under which it is necessary to obtain a search and seizure warrant before crime scene processing. According to the Fourth Amendment search and seizure requirements, a warrant is required any time a reasonable expectation of privacy exists. Therefore, in an effort to protect the right of the people and their belongings against unreasonable search and seizures and up hold the law officials accountable for fair treatment and processing procedures. When a crime scene investigator comes upon the scene, they must…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Michigan to Evidence Seized During Unauthorized Nighttime Searches. Brigham Young University Law Review, 2007(2), 451.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays