Preview

Evolution Of Eugenics

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1394 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Evolution Of Eugenics
Beginning in the 1980s the history and concept of eugenics were widely discussed as knowledge about genetics advanced significantly. Endeavors such as the Human Genome Project made the effective modification of the human species seem possible again (as did Darwin's initial theory of evolution in the 1860s, along with the rediscovery of Mendel's laws in the early 20th century). The difference at the beginning of the 21st century was the guarded attitude towards eugenics, which had become a watchword to be feared rather than embraced.

Only a few scientific researchers (such as the controversial psychologist Richard Lynn) have openly called for eugenic policies using modern technology but they represent a minority opinion in current scientific
…show more content…
Since the program's implementation in the 1970s, it has reduced the ratio of children born with the hereditary blood disease from 1 out of every 158 births to almost zero. Dor Yeshorim, a program which seeks to reduce the incidence of Tay-Sachs disease among certain Jewish communities, is another screening program which has drawn comparisons with eugenics. In Israel, at the expense of the state, the general public is advised to carry out genetic tests to diagnose the disease before the birth of a baby. If an unborn baby is diagnosed with Tay-Sachs the pregnancy may be terminated, subject to consent. Most other Ashkenazi Jewish communities also run screening programmes due to the higher incidence of the disease. In some Jewish communities, the ancient custom of matchmaking (shidduch) is still practised, and in order to attempt to prevent the tragedy of infant death which always results from being homozygous for Tay-Sachs, associations such as the strongly observant Dor Yeshorim (which was founded by a rabbi who lost four children to the condition in order to prevent others suffering the same tragedy) test young couples to check whether they carry a risk of passing on this disease or certain other fatal conditions. If both the young man and young woman are Tay-Sachs carriers, it is common for the match to be …show more content…
Presumably these people would judge what intelligence is themselves, creating a dangerous situation which even most eugenicists condemn. Examples of the argument for this view can be found on the extreme pro-eugenics website eugenics.net, whose principles may seem noble until one sees some of the methods they suggest for completing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Applied Eugenics by P. Popenoe and R.H. Johnson The Argument: The main focus of the article Applied Eugenics, written by P. Popenoe and R.H. Johnson, is that it would be detrimental to the American gene pool to allow foreigners to immigrate to Unites States soil. This article identifies that, in 1918, there were approximately “14,000,000 foreign-born persons, together with other millions of the sons and daughters of foreigners who although born on American soil have as yet been little assimilated to Americanism” (Popenoe & Johnson, 1918). They argue that foreigners should not be absorbed, as the stock that is incoming is not as hardy as the stock that the original invaders brought with them, as necessitated by the vigorous voyage to, and strenuous establishment on,…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Most people would concede that cloning and genetic enhancements are two notorious words that most would not consent with. In Mr. Kass’s article “Preventing Brave New World” commences on the astonishing achievements in bio-medical science and technology. Mr. Leon E. Kass agrees that people should be obliged for the breakthrough of advanced bio medical science and technology. Mr. Kass’s incredible work in bio-ethical science has placed this very well known philosopher in the white house with the Bush’s administration. Mr. Kass mentions in his article that we live in a world where transforming powers are already being applied in the 20th century, For example; In vitro fertilization, bottled embryos wombs, surrogate wombs, cloning, genetic screening,…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Executive director of the Center for Genetics and Society, Richard Hayes in the article “Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks”, published in the Washington Post address the topic of science’s developing world of selective genes and rebuttals the promotion of parent selective genes.…

    • 238 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sanger simultaneously sought to connect birth control to the eugenics movement. This would apply to mostly women of color, and most of the time women were being sterilized without their consent. She believed that in doing so poor families and families of color would have less children resulting in a more “fit” population, since they have undesirable traits such as low intelligence. McCormick was also apart of a suffrage movement that excluded black women and other minorities.…

    • 77 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks,” the author Richard Hayes is responding to Ronald M. Green’s article on gene therapy. Hayes is a visiting scholar at the University of California at Berkeley and has a Ph.D. in Energy and Resources. He has also addressed the United Nations about banning human cloning worldwide. The author argues against using genetic therapy in human research because of the risk it provides for human rights. He believes that it will likely result in the escalation of social inequality. Hayes is wrong, but also right at the same time. He is right about how gene manipulation has the potential to cause some real harm, but is wrong about how people should never use genetic technologies.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Baltimore’s written work of Limiting Science: A Biologist’s Perspective discusses the controversy of research in molecular biology and its limitless freedom, disputing there should be freedom in which direction science heads, but the public should decide the pace at which it goes. Baltimore first begins his argument with the discussion of how molecular biology began. It was born from individual sciences where attempts at trying to solve the mysteries in these fields led to the realization that the answers lied in genetics. Advances in the field are what really are at the heart of this discussion though. The most critical one is the development of recombinant DNA where DNA can be multiplied for an indefinite period, but the potential of this process has scared some scientists, even Baltimore himself, about unforeseen events. This led to even more unsettling questions that inevitably hurt the field of genetics, which Baltimore goes on to explain that the dangers have been blown out of proportion. The most common subject that comes to discussion through these fears is genetic engineering. Baltimore delves into the two techniques for altering imperfect genes, and then raises two questions that normally pop up. Who gets to decide what genes get altered and how will they decide it will be done? For Baltimore this presents a dilemma of both ethics and morals and thus presents the real problem at heart. To clarify the argument against recombinant DNA research Baltimore presents to the reader similar arguments. After he gives us the danger of actively researching genetic engineering, Baltimore flips the coin and argues the danger of restricting it. His theory is that the criterion used to decide how science should be handled reflects a dominant principle of governing. This should not be allowed to control scientific advances nor should science be the servant to this ideology, mainly because of the repercussions on society it could…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article “The New Eugenics,” George Neumayr points out that “fewer and fewer disabled infants are born” due to eugenics (649). Neumayr also describes…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    What may start off having even the best of intentions could end up having some serious negative consequences. Theodore “Teddy” Roosevelt seemed to have started his belief in eugenics within a sense of nationalism where it was a woman’s duty to the state to birth and raise a family. He emphasized this view through his conservation programs where white, farming women were the epitome of the ideal type of person that should be procreating. Unlike the weak, feebleminded, retarded, deaf, blind, etc. who should not pass along their unwanted genetics. There are a few other authors in our text book, American Earth: Environmental Writing Since Thoreau, that also followed this program of eugenics masked by a conservationist agenda.…

    • 2674 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Designer Babies Analysis

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages

    People strive for progression in order to move forward with the changing times. As scientific technology progresses, people begin to move towards the bright idea of perfection. This could be seen in the concept of designer babies. A designer baby is a baby that has its genes specifically chosen in order to ensure that a certain gene is or is not present. This concept brings about many questions regarding the safety and the ethics of choosing specific traits for a child. The articles “The art of medicine: Designer babies: Choosing our children's genes,” by Bonnie Steinbock and “Children to…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With the development of genetic modification scientists have created a chicken that has a dinosaur leg in a reverse evolution experiment, a goat that produces spider silk, featherless chicken, glow in the dark cats, sheep and monkeys and recently in February 2016 British scientists were granted permission to genetically modify human embryos. Just as Etienne Geoffroy St. Hilaire and his son Isidore Geoffroy St. Hilaire created malformations in chicken embryos, scientists in the 21st century are creating malformations in animals in the name of science – for “the good” of human beings. Wherever a person situates themselves in time, whether it is in the 18th century or 21st century, people need to understand that there will always be consequences for what we choose to do with the knowledge we gain. Knowledge can create and knowledge can destroy- both in the physical realm and in the moral realm. Morally speaking, knowledge can change how individuals (and collectively human beings) view themselves in the world and how individuals view other animals and material things in the…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    During the 1920’s, science and social legislation came to be intertwined, and the study of human genetic variation was born; this was known as the term eugenics. Eugenics is the improvement of a species by emphasizing the characteristics that are beneficial. Positive eugenics it is the act of improving a species by emphasizing the propagation of those traits that are seen as beneficial. Negative Eugenics is the act of improving the species by preventing the spread of those traits that are seen as dysgenic or harmful.…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eugenics can have an upside to human life. Eugenics can be used to assess a child’s medical needs. Parents already know the particular DNA makeup of their unborn child, which allows them to be prepared to meet the medical needs of that…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Future Eugenics

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Consumer driven eugenics practices like designer babies, provide parents with choices, something that the old eugenics never did. However, these choices may inhibit conditions for choice in the future. Screening embryos for diseases and creating children “In our own image” (Galton, David (2001)) can help parents give their children the best quality of life possible. Yet, in the future these techniques could put pressure on parents to create increasingly perfect children and enhance them above the normal species functioning. This may result in parents who choose to continue a pregnancy…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Eugenics

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Even though eugenics can improve someone’s life, the government should not be allowed to decide if future children have good or bad genes because we are not completely sure what is necessary and what is not and you are altering something that was naturally…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to J A. Robertson, PGD is ethically controversial because it involves the screening and likely destruction of embryos, and the selection of offspring on the basis of expected traits. This raises important concerns related to whether and when PGD should be used, its safety and effectiveness, and what it would mean to live in a society where one’s genetics become more a matter of choice than chance.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics