Preview

Evil vs Evil

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
734 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Evil vs Evil
Fight evil with evil?
While reading The Crito we learn of the infamous philosopher Socrates being held as a criminal for his teachings in the Ancient Greek world. His wealthy friend, Crito, the one that the passage is named off of, tries to tell Socrates that his fate isn’t as close as it seems, explaining that an sufficient amount of money could lead to his freedom. Crito tries to save his life by bribing the city of Athens to free him of jail and thus ending the trial that would’ve ended his life. Socrates declines his proposal, basing that he is honoring his teachings and ideas and saying that he reaped what he sow. This decision by Socrates will be very crucial on what learning what evil is, and thus, can one defend one’s self against evil by doing evil, or the person fighting evil lose all reason because they themselves used evil to fight evil?

While in prison, Socrates talks about the Almighty God, being that Socrates is an individual guided by reason and he does not fear his fate as he told his friend Crito. He also notes that he feels contempt for the people of mankind who think irrationally and lives a careless and free life, basing on living a life that isn’t worth living, and thus without a life without purpose, what is the point of living at all? Socrates also notes that the only one the only one whose opinion is of more value than others is the one who truly understands justice and what justice has with it, so in comparison, Socrates believes that if he tries to leave the city, people will accuse him of being a coward and he will be remembered for how he escaped the city of Athens and wasn’t ready to meet his true fate, as Socrates already told his friend Crito he is ready to die for what he did, albeit that he didn’t do anything wrong, just didn’t teach the right way the city of Athens wanted him to teach, and thus Crito, as discussed, despises him for it but continues to have a discussion with his close friend.
As The Crito goes on, Socrates

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato's Crito Worksheet

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. In paragraphs 43-46a, Crito gives Socrates a number of reasons why he should escape. State one of them in your own words. He will be killed un-honorably.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crito

    • 638 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Crito offers Socrates to escape prison and run away to another city, because he says it will be painful for him to lose such a good friend this way and that there are many people waiting to help, and also that they will be disappointed if he didn’t escape. Socrates says he is worried that if he escapes Crito and his companions will be in danger. Crito says it is easy to bribe them because he and his friends have enough money.…

    • 638 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the Crito, Plato introduces several arguments that Socrates makes on whether or not it would be just for him to escape from prison when the Athenians have not acquitted him. Socrates begins by arguing that one must never do wrong. One of the most compelling arguments that he goes on to make is that doing harm to someone is wrong and therefore one must never engage in retaliatory harm. Under certain circumstances, such as self-defense, retaliatory harm is necessary. Socrates also argues that whenever you violate an agreement, you harm the person you made the agreement with. Therefore, escaping is wrong. In this paper, I shall argue that although the arguments support…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In "Crito," Plato uses Socrates as a tool to argue the point. Socrates is in jail for "preaching false gods" and "corrupting the youth" by causing them to doubt or disregard the wisdom of their…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's "Crito" is a dialogue between Socrates and one of his closest friends Crito. The entire dialogue takes place in Socrates prison cell, where he awaits execution. Crito visits Socrates before dawn in order to persuade him to escape from prison and flee to another city or country. Crito has made all the necessary arrangements to smuggle Socrates out of prison to safety. To Crito's despair Socrates seems quite willing to accept his execution, and so Crito presents as many arguments as he can to persuade Socrates to escape. Socrates manages through a logical thinking process to demount all of Crito's arguments for escaping the prison.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the story of Crito, Socrates is in prison and awaiting his execution that he was found guilty by corrupting the youth and also supporting other gods that the city of Athens did not. Throughout his trial, Socrates argued each of the things he was charged for and made it very clear that it was not just for him to be found guilty for these actions. The jury ended up finding Socrates guilty through a very slim vote that was not necessarily fair by any means. As Socrates sat in his cell, one of his very faithful friends, Crito, decided to come talk to him. He gave Socrates the opportunity to escape prison and live the life of a wanted man instead of facing his execution. As the story of Crito goes on, he asks himself a number of questions deciding on what he was going to do and whether it would be just or unjust for him to escape prison. Socrates eventually decided that he was going to stay in prison and face his execution instead of escaping, for the act of escaping prison would be unjust and breaking the laws of the city. I agree with Socrates’ decision that he made and feel like he did the just thing by facing his execution.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    • 1. In the Apology, Socrates recounts how he disobeyed the unjust order of the Thirty Tyrants to arrest a fellow citizen; he also claims that he will never stop philosophizing, regardless of what the legally constituted political authority commands. Yet, in the Crito, Socrates provides numerous arguments for obeying the decision of the legally constituted political authority, even though the decision (to put Socrates to death) was unjust. Critically assess whether Socrates’s view about political obligation in the two texts is consistent.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    For these two articles that we read in Crito and Apology by Plato, we could know Socrates is an enduring person with imagination, because he presents us with a mass of contradictions: Most eloquent men, yet he never wrote a word; ugliest yet most profoundly attractive; ignorant yet wise; wrongfully convicted, yet unwilling to avoid his unjust execution. Behind these conundrums is a contradiction less often explored: Socrates is at once the most Athenian, most local, citizenly, and patriotic of philosophers; and yet the most self-regarding of Athenians. Exploring that contradiction, between ¡§Socrates the loyal Athenian citizen¡¨ and ¡§Socrates the philosophical critic of Athenian society,¡¨ will help to position Plato¡¦s Socrates in an Athenian legal and historical context; it allows us to reunite Socrates the literary character and Athens the democratic city that tried and executed him. Moreover, those help us to understand Plato¡¦s presentation of the strange legal and ethical drama.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since Athenians were so close minded, they out casted anyone that didn't conform to their traditions. They should have been open to anything and not simply dislike a person or a situation because it didn’t follow their ideals. Socrates’ trial eventually led to his death and this illustrates that everyone has limitations. We can’t reject what we were taught or certain laws in society just because we don’t agree. Society functions because we work together and change together not because we do what we want. Furthermore, when Socrates was on trial he made a point to say that the democracy was poison to the people. Yet when his friend Crito offers him an escape from his death he denies the offer because he believes it is unjust to not face his execution. There are many theories behind why Socrates said no since he didn’t support the democracy; I believe it is because he had an open mind. (Crito,76-77). Yes, him being open-minded lead to his death; however, it indicates that he understood limitations of the law and respected societies perspectives.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s theory of justice is about equality and that one deserves punishment if they do commit an unjust action. During the Crito, Socrates tries to correct a lot of points that Crito is trying to argue with him about, what it means to be justice. To be justice, means a human being that does good based on the laws that are emplaced according to the state. Good people according to Socrates are only worth considering. People that do good are considered moral people, and have opinions that should be regarded because their inputs are considered to be ethically correct. Being a human of ethical virtues means that they must not do wrong. Anything that is immoral, is considered immoral. We as humans may not intervene in activities that deem to be…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Is Socrates Flawed

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page

    But Socrates is obeying the Law, not his accusers. The reason Socrates must stay in prison is that he must show deference to the Laws, not to the people Not all opinions are of equal value--that some are sound and some are flawed--and that one should follow the opinions of the wise, which are sound, and not of the foolish, which are flawed. The opinions of the wise in any matter come from experts in those matters. In this case, it is of even greater importance not to take anyone and everyone's advice, but to listen only to experts who know best how to handle such matters. Crito, then, is wrong to worry about public opinion regarding matters of justice: he should ignore it altogether, paying heed only to those who are wise about justice. Thus,…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Vs Crito

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the reading CRITO the verdict of execution has already been given and now Socrates and colleagues must make the decision to flee the city of Athens or stay and face his fate. In this conversation you have Critos point of view and Socrates. Based on Critos reasoning he states three reasons why Socrates should stay, the first two being selfish but the third hitting home.…

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Unjust

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    At the end of Crito, Socrates states “Then let me follow the intimations of the will of God” (Plato 54), giving insight into the belief that God has a predetermined plan for him, and if no human knows the true meaning of just and unjust, than if any being did understand this concept, it would be God. Socrates believes it is not up to him to go against God, and if God is doing nothing to stop his death, then this must be his plan. Therefore, if Socrates does not follow through with his plan, he will be going against God’s will, which is impious and ultimately…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Good Vs. Evil

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Good versus evil: the ultimate showdown throughout history is manifested in the mind as the id versus the superego. The problem with that fight is the same issue that occurs in the mind, that evil is only viewed as evil because the side of good says that it is. In the dystopian novels 1984 by George Orwell and Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, the concept of good and evil is explored. The two novels contrast in their views of the best way to rule a society, with the World State in Brave New World aids the id in overcoming the superego, while on the other hand in 1984 society the superego has crushed the id. Sigmund Freud, a psychologist that lived from 1856 to 1939, developed a tripartite model for the human psyche. A majority of his theories…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Crito, the documentation of the debate between Crito and Socrates regarding whether or not Socrates should flee and live in exile or remain and be executed, Socrates details and explains why he feels that life is not worth living if you live a corrupted soul. Having been sentenced to death for his pursuit of a just and fulfilled life, Socrates chooses that death is the favorable option over fleeing; citing that fleeing is an unjust action and that a life that is unjust is not a life worth living. Socrates views…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics