To understand heritage, one must have a personal connection of that history, in everyday use Dee do not really have a connection to her heritage so blind by anger of what she does not understand she view her heritage in history as an oppression. In the process she constructed a heritage for herself and reject her real heritage, Dee change her name cause she feel as if her name is not of legacy but the name of her family oppressors so she take on the name of “Wangero Leewamika Kemanjo” (page. 426 25), believes it has …show more content…
The family heirlooms are the true tokens of Dee’s (Wangero Leewamika Kemanjo) identity and origins, knows little about the past and the essential facts about how the quilts were made and what fabrics were used to make them, she pretends to be deeply connected to this folk tradition. Her desire to hang the quilts, in a museum like exhibit, suggests that she feels reverence for them but that to her they are essentially foreign, impersonal objects. Mama believe that Maggie should have these quilt not Dee because Maggie will have better use for them. At the end of the story Dee stated that Mama and Maggie do not understand their heritage (page 429, 75), the turn of event it’s actually Dee herself who does not understand her heritage. In Alice Walker’s short story Everyday Use, she bring up many issue such as comparing relationship between heritage and tradition past. The