Preview

Euthyphro

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
771 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Euthyphro
Euthyphro Socrates is impressed by the fact that Euthyphro is willing to perform his duty even though it means taking action against a member of his own family. Without any further discussion of the case involving Euthyphro 's father, Socrates is anxious to pursue the nature of piety since this is related to the fact that Meletus has accused him of the crime of impiety. This is why he asks Euthyphro, "What is piety?" Euthyphro answers that piety is acting the way he is acting in bringing charges against one who has done wrong, even though that person happens to be his own father. Admitting that Euthyphro is right in not allowing personal relationships to stand in the way of performing his duty, Socrates is not happy with the answer that Euthyphro gave him. Euthyphro gave one example, and even though he defended his statement by mentioning that certain Greek gods have acted in a similar manner, Socrates insists that a proper definition of piety must be an example of that virtue. Socrates insists that, as Euthyphro has brought a criminal charge against his own father, he must have known the nature of impiety or he would have been unable to decide that his father was guilty of it. Once again he urges Euthyphro to tell him what piety is. If he can obtain an answer that suffices him, it will enable him to know whether the charge that Meletus is bringing against him is a good one or not. Euthyphro says, "Piety is what is dear to the gods and impiety is that which is not dear to them." It is not clear what makes anything dear to the gods, and besides, there is the question of whether that which is dear to some of the gods is dear to all of them or only to some of them. Euthyphro then insists that piety is that which is pleasing to all of the gods. He feels sure they all agree that murder is wrong. Socrates then points out that the circumstances under which killing takes place makes an important difference concerning the moral quality of the act. It is also


Cited: Plato, Aristocles. "The Porch of the King Archon." Euthyphro. Translated by Benjamin Jowett ed. Greece: Plato, 380. 1-16. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Socrates rises the dilemma about what pious is and do the gods love something because it is pious, or is something pious because the gods love it? Socrates and Euthyphro both agree that surely the gods love the pious because it is the pious. But than Socrates argues that we are forced to reject the second option: the fact that the gods love (something) cannot explain why the pious is the pious. This is because, if both options were true, they would go in circles with the gods loving the pious because it is the pious, and the pious being the pious because the gods love it. And this in turn means, Socrates argues, that the pious is not the same as the god-beloved, because what makes the pious the pious is not what makes the god-beloved the god-beloved. After all, what makes the god-beloved the god-beloved is the fact that the gods love it, whereas what makes the pious the pious is something else. Thus Euthyphro's theory does not give us the very nature of the pious.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates and Euthyphro unexpectedly run into each other outside of the Athens courthouse. Euthyphro went to the courthouse to prosecute his father for killing one of his servants, who was a murderer. Socrates was summoned to court to be charged with disturbing the youth. After Euthyphro stated his business at the courthouse, Socrates assumes that he must be a religious expert if he is willing to prosecute his own father on such a serious charge. Euthyphro then agrees with Socrates that he does indeed know all there is to know about what is holy. Socrates asks Euthyphro to teach him what holiness is, in hope that it will help with his trial.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phi Euthyphro

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This discussion wraps around the reason Socrates is on trial and his standing on piety in which he wishes not to follow. When speaking to Euthyphro, Socrates uses this moment to help himself understand what the meaning of piety is to himself and emits to Euthyphro that he does not know.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Euthyphro- Plato

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the writing called Euthyphro by Plato, Socrates is being charged with corrupting the youth and not believing in all of the Gods. He is being accused of this by a man named Meletus who feels as though he is guilty of not believing in the Gods of the states. Not only does he not believe in the Gods but he is accused of making up new ones. The crimes that he is being charged with go hand in hand with each other but he maintains his innocence because he feels he isn’t guilty. While on the other hand Euthyphro is prosecuting his father and indicting him for murder. Morally Euthyphro feels as though it’s the right thing to do and his family doesn’t agree only because it’s his father. In this essay I will summarize the dialogue and its message relating to piety/holiness.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an analysis of Plato’s Euthyphro, Peter Geach claims that Socrates commits the Socratic fallacy when he refuses Euthyphro’s first definition of piety. Socrates rejects the definition given because it does not give a formal definition of what piety is, but instead offers examples of things and actions that are pious. Geach believes that this is a substantial fallacy committed by Socrates, one that may prevent him from getting at the truth of the matter. I will first expand on Geach’s Socratic fallacy, as well as explain why this fallacy presents itself as a problem for Geach. Then I will examine Euthyphro to see if Geach is correct in assuming that Socrates commits the Socratic fallacy. In addition to Euthyphro, I will look at another one…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the passage Euthyphro written by Plato a discussion arises dealing with the question “What is piety”? This question arises after a man named Euthyphro is found walking into a courthouse preparing to prosecute against his own father who took part in a murder. His friend Socrates eventually confronts him when he sees him and once the story is explained to Socrates and once he calms down due to being surprised that Euthyphro is prosecuting against his own father he asks Euthyphro what exactly he considers the definition of piety and impiety to be.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Piety, says Euthyphro, is what all the gods love, and the impious is what all the gods hate. Socrates is not satisfied by this definition, either, and so he tries a different tack to extract a definition from Euthyphro. Socrates does this by asking: “Is the pious being loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is being loved by the gods?” When Euthyphro seems unsure, Socrates simplifies his question with an analogy. He asks Euthyphro if something is “carried” because it is “a thing carried,” or if it is “carried” because something is carrying it. Both men agree that the action confers the state of being. That is, a thing loved is so because someone loves it, and the thing itself is not creating a state of “loving” within the people around it. Likewise, being loved is not a state inherent to the thing loved, but is the result of the love others bear for the thing. Moving from his analogy back to Euthyphro’s definition, Socrates shows the fallacy in Euthyphro’s statement. Being god-loved cannot confer piety, as it confers “god-loved-ness” instead. Therefore, in Euthyphro’s statement, all the gods loving something would make that thing universally god-loved, but in no way makes it pious. An act is loved by the gods because it is pious, and not the other way…

    • 1979 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conversation between Socrates and Euthyphro takes place at the marketplace. Euthyphro is on his way to charge his father for murder, and Socrates is going to his own trial, because he was accused of corrupting the minds of the youth. Before going into his trial, Socrates asks Euthyphro, who claims to be a spiritually enlightened prophet, what exactly makes something of piety or impiety. He asks this, because he wants to be seen as Euthyphro’s student, and so that he can use Euthyphro’s teachings in order to understand the difference between godliness and ungodliness, so that he can represent himself in court. As Euthyphro attempts to define it in clear and general terms, Socrates brings up different flaws and perspectives on his explanations that cause him to delve into it. As they continue to discuss it, Socrates’ questions cause Euthyphro to come full circle back to his first explanation of it, and they never come to a clear conclusion.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Euthyphro, Euthyphro is prosecuting his father for manslaughter. Euthyphro states that it does not matter if the person his father killed was a relative or stranger. Instead, it mattered on the subject of whether or not the act of murder was justified or not. Socrates tries to understand Euthyphro’s definition of what is pious and what is impious, but does not get the answer he is looking for. Every answer Euthyphro gives Socrates finds a flaw in the definition. Socrates is looking for an answer that has a general form and essence. The form is the definition itself, while the essence or substance is something that we can grasp without the definition.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    For these two articles that we read in Crito and Apology by Plato, we could know Socrates is an enduring person with imagination, because he presents us with a mass of contradictions: Most eloquent men, yet he never wrote a word; ugliest yet most profoundly attractive; ignorant yet wise; wrongfully convicted, yet unwilling to avoid his unjust execution. Behind these conundrums is a contradiction less often explored: Socrates is at once the most Athenian, most local, citizenly, and patriotic of philosophers; and yet the most self-regarding of Athenians. Exploring that contradiction, between ¡§Socrates the loyal Athenian citizen¡¨ and ¡§Socrates the philosophical critic of Athenian society,¡¨ will help to position Plato¡¦s Socrates in an Athenian legal and historical context; it allows us to reunite Socrates the literary character and Athens the democratic city that tried and executed him. Moreover, those help us to understand Plato¡¦s presentation of the strange legal and ethical drama.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Socrates and Euthyphro begin to have a discussion about if Euthyphro's fathers' murder is pious or impious, he begins to debate with him about Euthyphro's father's trial as well as taking his own trial into consideration. When they start to discuss the difference between piety and impiety, Euthyphro first starts by explaining what piety is by giving a simple example instead of giving the actual definition. He mentions what he is doing to his father for manslaughter is pious or just but Socrates finds this statement rubbish because it is not a definition and merely an example of piety. The statement that Euthyphro says does not supply any essential quality which makes pious things actually pious. Euthyphro says, "The pious is to do what I am doing now, to prosecute the wrongdoer, and be it about murder or temple robbery or anything else, whether the wrongdoer is your father ot your mother or anyone else." One can blatantly see that there is no substance to this statement to consider it an actual definition, but really just a…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plato already makes us wonder what he may mean by this. As the defense goes on, Socrates doesn 't beg or plead for his mercy. Instead he mocks his accusers, and tries to make Meletus look foolish. He 's presumed to be…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, from a young age we are taught the difference from what is right and what is wrong. This would support that notion virtuous qualities can indeed be shared and passed on to others. While we all may not share the same viewpoint on what is right or what is wrong, these ideas have be taught to us and have helped to shape our behavior. Therefore, Socrates’ belief that virtuous qualities are not emitted to others opposes an intrinsic fact that is exemplified by people such as Pericles in the dialogue. The mere fact that Pericles was trying to educate Cleinias demonstrates of how fathers or guardians aim to teach their children virtue and instill in them the qualities that make them outstanding…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scientific Method

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A young man by the name of Euthyphro involves himself in a conversation with the well known Socrates. During this conversation Euthyphro attempts to impose unrealistic beliefs concerning piety. Euthyphro is the plaintiff in a murder suit that he is filing against his very own father. Euthyphro believes that he has a case against his father, the reasons the young man comes up with does not sufficiently satisfy Socrates. This text is a great example of beliefs of a young man; against the wisdom and knowledge of older man. In the final analysis Socrates conversation with Euthyphro, smashes all of Euthyphro’s ideas and conceptions. Euthypro’s belief system has diminished and what he thought may be sound, good reasoning concerning the gods proves to be meaningless conversation. Euthyphro speaks in fallacy, Socrates sees right through it; and that is apparent in his questioning toward the young man. W. K. Clifford wrote an essay titled “The Ethics of Belief” in which he “argues that there is an ethic to belief that makes it always wrong for anyone to believe anything on insufficient evidence.” (Pojman/Rea 498) This short essay of comparing thoughts and beliefs will compare how Euthyphro by Plato, shows the importance of belief in comparison to that of W. K. Clifford in “The Ethics of Belief.” Furthermore, it is important to see how the text on Euthyphro’s conversation with Socrates, by Plato, truly shows that belief is invalid without proper evidence to justify it.…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crito Reaction

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates views on integrity are shown through his dialogue with Crito after being imprisoned for “corrupting the youth and interfering with the religion of the city” (Kemerling n.pag). When deciding what to do about his imprisonment, Socrates questions Crito, “And what of doing evil in return for evil, which is the morality of many, is that just or not . . . For doing evil to another is the same as injuring him?” (Plato 62). By analyzing the law and questioning justice, Socrates displays honesty and righteousness. Socrates concludes that revenge is immoral and rejects it, while Hammurabi encourages it. Socrates’ morals of justice are also illustrated when imagines the law telling him: “If you go forth, returning evil for evil, and injury for injury … and wronging those whom you ought least to wrong … we… and the laws in the world below, will receive you as an enemy” (Plato 68). Socrates once again explains that seeking vengeance is wrong which sharply contrasts the eye for an eye method. His beliefs in justice and honesty are much more reasonable than Hammurabi’s eye for an eye belief because Socrates displays honor and integrity while Hammurabi supports wrongdoing upon others.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics