Preview

Euthanasia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1273 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Euthanasia
suicide * agent responsible for death

euthanasia

* a second person responsible for person dying

assisted suicide * person dying is the agent respelled for death

* second person gives access to the person dying

EUTHANASIA/ ASSISTED SUICIDE

Callahan

AGAINST:

1) Right to self Determination

Calahan: Self Determination and Mercy of Others. (It’s a social act, you can claim it’s a murder.) Aiding someone to die, is the new category of killing

***Believes that assisting someone in dying is supposedly a new category of an acceptable killing and he doesn’t think so

People think that helping someone die is not acceptable

Only 3 ways to take someone’s life:
1. self defense
2. in war ..legal war
3. killing by agents of state (cop killing someone)

WOLF

Argues that women are treated as gender discrimination in Euthanasia through the contrast statistics of more deaths by assisted suicide or euthanasia in women than men.

Gender also may affect the physician’s choice to grant or refuse component’s decision. Which brings the question whether we see Missy as a women that has her right to choose what’s best for her, or just an object.

COURT CASES:

Two court cases related Quinland and Cruzan

Quinland has people who cannot say for themselves because they are:
1. Sick
OR
In coma from accident

Quinland accepts hypothetical consent while Cruzan doesn’t In a coma and someone else is representing them
Knowing someone well and making decision based on what you think the person would want
Ex. gay boy case

Quinland (NJ court)

Family requests that respirator be removed but this is called battery
The person may refuse the right to want help

A lethal injection is like being raped because they are insertions in your body that you may not want

Washington Glucksberg

Washington (Right to refuse medical treatment/ for Liberty Right)

Quil

Equal protection

Cruzan (U.S supreme court)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Dax Cowart

    • 4530 Words
    • 17 Pages

    euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, mercy killing, and assistance in dying. They argue that involuntary euthanasia is an…

    • 4530 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The scenario of the woman who had lived in a coma for 15 years brought out a lively discussion about death. When I consider my opinion on this topic, I have thought through everyone’s comments and my thoughts have reinforced my support of this woman’s right to die, however I don’t think is a very good example of assisted suicide. When I think of assisted suicide I think about someone with a terminal disease who is aware that they will never get better and they can make a conscious decision to end their life. Life becomes unbearable for someone with end stage cancer. The pain and the inability to perform any type of normal activity could drive someone to this decision. I believe that this is a very individual choice, much like what we discussed when we spoke of the Socratic Methods. I guess I can say that I have reinforced my initial internal barometer on this being someone’s right to make this decision and I should not judge…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is assisting a loved one to die morally acceptable or is it murder? This essay will look at both sides of this argument and leave the reader to decide which side they more agree with. The main article I will be looking at is the one by Susan M. Wolf and the death of her sick father. There are two sides to this situation. One group of people feel that it is morally and lawfully wrong to help in the death of any person, regardless of who they are and believe the culprit to be just as guilty as a murderer. Others will argue that it is only helping to speed up a process that is inevitably coming and helping a person to quit the pain is human nature showing sympathy and courage. In this essay, I will be looking at both sides of this argument and leave it to the reader to decide which argument he believes to be more reasonable.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hca 322 Week 5 Final

    • 3435 Words
    • 14 Pages

    “Aid in dying” is the most extensive idea of assisting someone to die. One component of this extensive idea is physician assisted death. Physician assisted death includes all of the types of euthanasia such as, active and passive euthanasia, which can be either voluntary or involuntary. A small subset of physician assisted death is physician assisted suicide (PAS). The concept of PAS covers a range of activities. On one end of the spectrum, there is the model used in Oregon; whereas the physician screens those who are seeking to commit suicide and, after determining the mental state, desire, and medical condition of the patient, assists in dying by writing a prescription for a lethal drug overdose. On the other end of the PAS spectrum is the active participation of a physician in assisting the patient by starting an intravenous solution and thereby more directly providing the means by which a patient can initiate the final act of committing suicide (Breitbart, 2012). Though seldom discussed, it is widely understood that the principal role of the physician is to “comfort always,” a role especially important when all hope to benefit from further treatment has faded. This ethic has never included assisting in suicide. When eliminating pain requires large amounts of morphine, unintended death in palliative treatment to provide comfort care raises few ethical, or legal, concerns. Almost certainly, physicians and other caregivers sometimes listen to the pleas of severe pain stricken patients to help them die, or solely from compassionate impulses they occasionally perform involuntary, active euthanasia on a medically hopeless patient who can no longer communicate (Sullivan, 2011). Indeed, both legal counsel and the healthcare administrators that provide advice must understand the legal and ethical implications of issues…

    • 3435 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He presents an argument against the practice of euthanasia stemming from three turning points in western thought. The discussion begins with the “killing versus letting die” distinction. Contrary to some beliefs on the matter, Callahan says that there is a moral difference between killing and letting die, and to overlook this difference would conflate causality and culpability. Callahan writes, “to say that a doctor ‘kills’ a patient by allowing [death] to happen should only be understood as a moral judgment about the licitness of his omission…it is the underlying disease that brings death when treatment is omitted…” (383). This leads to two disturbing possibilities: health care practitioners are morally and physically responsible for the deaths of their patients and every time life-prolonging treatment proves ineffective, a quick and direct killing will be logical. Next, he turns to the role of self-determination, claiming that it does not follow from the fact that you have a right to self-determination that someone else can permissibly kill you. If everyone has a right to life, then others have a duty to protect this right. So then how can others assist in killing you if they have a contradictory duty to help preserve your life? One of Callahan’s replies is that if one is a slave, her will and moral responsibility are turned over to someone else, and this turning over of her rights…

    • 2172 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assisted suicide is defined as a controversial medical and ethical issue based on the question of whether, in certain situations, medical practitioners should be allowed to help patients actively determine the time and circumstances of their death. An assisted suicide is usually a situation where a patient is terminally ill, and a doctor prescribes a lethal dose of medication for the patient to ingest when they choose. Another way this is done is when the doctor discontinues giving certain treatment, at request of the patient. The conflict of whether assisted suicide is right or wrong has many different branches in the aspects of ethical, social, and legal issues, often with two main arguments; on the supporting side, people say that everyone should have the right to decide the time, place, and circumstances of his/her death, while the opposing side of this issue state that assisted suicide infers that certain people’s lives are…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Imagine being sentenced to a slow and painful death due to terminal illness. Sounds like…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This means that the person providing the means knows that what they are providing is going to be used to end a life. For example, the assistance portion cannot be composed of selling a gun to an individual with no knowledge of what it will be used for. When the means of ending the life is a medication prescribed by a doctor for this purpose, the act becomes known as physician-assisted suicide. When the assistance consists of a friend providing a weapon or family member providing a place for the act to occur, it is referred to as assisted…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dr. Self-Annihilation

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages

    People who support self-annihilation of somebody facing intolerable pain square measure serving to that hopeless one that has set that death is healthier than life. it's argued that society ought to respect and defer to then liberty of selecting such Folks exercise in asking to be killed.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    • 7664 Words
    • 31 Pages

    Callahan, Daniel, Ph.D. "Self Extinction: The Morality of the Helping Hand." Physician-Assisted Suicide. Ed. Robert F. Weir. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1997. 69-85.…

    • 7664 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assisted Suicide

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The issue we are discussing in this paper is Assisted Suicide. The basic conflict is when a person who is sick or suffering rationally decides to end their life- should they be allowed to? Particularly through the help of a physician (Weir, 3). Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia, though similar, have a small difference. Assisted suicide is when the physician listens to the patient’s wishes and provides them with the information needed to commit suicide painlessly. Euthanasia, however, is when the doctor actually performs the act of putting their patient to death. Though they are different the two phrases tend to be interchangeable because the arguments for and against legalizing it are so similar. If you are against one you are generally against the other (Personal).…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The controversial issue of Euthanasia or assisted suicide has been widely argued over many years and present. Euthanasia literally means dying without suffering. Recently, a law of euthanasia has been legalized and made in the state of Oregon. There are people who agree the law of euthanasia, even though there are also people who strongly oppose it. The following articles examine questions and answers about issues on euthanasia or assisted suicide. The articles are “In Defense of Voluntary Euthanasia” by Sidney Hook, “Promoting a Culture of Abandonment” by Teresa R. Wagner, “The Right to Choose Death” by Kenneth Swift, and “Death and the Law: Why the Government Has an Interest in Preserving Life” by Lawrence Rudden and Gerard V. Bradley. Hook and Swift are people who support euthanasia. In contrast, Wagner, Rudden and Bradley don’t think euthanasia does any good to others. Since there are diversity views on euthanasia, authors argue on various issues of euthanasia in different ways.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Relativism and Morality

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When considering the theories of right and wrong, it is customary to think of them as absolute. If it’s wrong, it can’t be right or if it’s right, it can’t be wrong. It is only when we stop looking at these theories as absolutes that we can begin to explore the possibilities of moral, subjective and cultural relativity. I submit that a person’s actions are only right or wrong relative to their particular moral framework. It is wrong to kill is a statement that could be made by one based on his moral and/or cultural beliefs, thereby making it a true statement. However, the image becomes blurred when that same man is responsible for administering drugs to prisoners sentenced to death. Some would conclude that such acts raze his moral framework and change the truthfulness of the statement. I submit that, to make such a judgment absent the benefit of knowing the full extent of his moral beliefs would be flawed. There is the possibility that he defines killing and carrying out a death row sentence differently. Harman asserts that it is possible that when one says “It is wrong to steal” s/he is saying something true, but that when another says “It is wrong to steal” s/he is saying something…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Freedom of choice

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    more people help another commit suicide. Does that count as murder or does it not count because…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What is Crime

    • 2061 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Discussions regarding rights can become emotive, particularly when there is a conflict between individual and communal rights and responsibilities. While obligations, values, attitudes, and beliefs may appear to be individual, these things exist at the level of society as a whole, arising from social relationships and human association. The real effects are manifested in external indicators of sentiments such as religious doctrines, laws, and moral codes. Who is to say the image of someone facing unendurable suffering who calmly and rationally decides death is better than life. This is murder. Whether it be someone else’s life or their own, it is still the taking of a life, which is illegal.…

    • 2061 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays