Preview

European and Japanese Feudalism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
444 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
European and Japanese Feudalism
European and Japanese Feudalism

Feudalism was not only a European invention, the Japanese created their form of feudalism also at its height in Europe. These two feudalistic societies had their own similarities and some differences. But through this, feudalism had a great effect on Feudal Europe and Japan. European and Japanese feudalism systems both had the same general idea. This was for powerful landholders to establish and lead a class of warriors for protection. Ownership of land defined both forms of feudalism. If you had a lot of land you were considered to be wealthy and powerful. Both feudalistic systems acted as a type of government. For instance they both had an established pyramid but with different figureheads, and classes. Another thing they also had in common was they both were created as a response to the need of security and stability. Feudalism came at a time for Europe when they were getting invaded by the Vikings. And a time for Japan when it’s former political system fell in to decline. Feudalism proved to be a success in both Europe and Japan. These two feudalistic systems differed in so many ways. European feudalism descended from the Roman Empire and Germanic tribes. While Japanese feudalism came from Chinese Confucian law and the Buddhism. In Europe they had kings who had nobles, nobles provided knights mounted warrior, or infantry solders and under them were serfs. Japan was much more complex. They had an emperor, who had a shogun who had a daimyo that had samurais. Under samurais were merchants, peasants, farmers, and craft workers. Japanese samurais’ servants did didn’t tend to their land like in the case of the serfs of European knights. European feudalism was quite older than Japanese feudalism. The European system was more centralized than the Japanese system, because the Japanese emperor had no full control of the local aristocracy. Feudal Europe and Feudal Japan had more differences than similarities.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Feudal Japan Failure

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Feudal Japan was not a very successful civilization due to the choice of feudalism. Feudal Japan has succeeded, failed, and had a rather small evolution period. Japan had succeeded in ways of battle, environmental adaptations, literature, and other influences. Japan also failed greatly in governing. Japan had made good changes during and after the feudalist period especially the governmental changes. This feudalist period of Japan started in about 1185 starting with many changes and successes. The middle of the civilization showed the most failures overwhelming the successes. The ending of the civilization was the start of evolution. Therefore, Feudal Japan had small successes but was overall a failing civilization.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To compare the ranks they are very similar I.E the merchants in feudal japan were similar to those of the European one (Serfs/Peseants). Feudal Japanese and European societies were built on a system of hereditary classes. The nobles were at the top, followed by the warriors, with tenant farmers or serfs below them, there was very little social mobility. Between the classes.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first reason why I think the similarities are greater than differences is social position. The reason why I think social position is because; “The life of a samurai was not his own but belonged entirely to his lord, and it was the duty of a (samurai) to consider this at all times….”. [Doc B]This…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine yourself as a Samurai, you are in the middle of defeating the European knights who are covered in plated armor. You begin to worry but then, you win, these are the reasons why a Samurai is better than a knight. Feudalism in Europe and Japan were both very similar. They both has rulers, and they both had rulers who hired nobles, and they both had nobles who hired landowners, and they both had landowners who hired warriors to protect the slaves and their land. If samurai and knights were to have fought against each other the samurai would have won because, they had movable armor and it was easier for them to dodge anything that a knight would slowly lunge at them with. If a Samurai and knights battled the knights would have fallen because, their armor was very defective. A knight's armor wasn’t made for easy movement, this made it more difficult for them to fight, but overall they were well protected(Document B). Their armor did defend them but, a Knight’s armor could easily be penetrated by a soldier…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Since the development of the first civilizations, people have been divided into groups and categories. Some civilizations are divided according to gender and age, others according to field of work, and still others by social class or standing. Several provided documents offer differing evidence, opinions, and points of views regarding feudalism, one of the many systems developed by civilizations to organize and control their populations. Feudalism is the political, military, and social system that was established during the Middle Ages. Different regions and countries adhered to this system, including Western Europe and Japan.…

    • 1967 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason why samurai and knights were different was how their armour was made. The armour knights and samurais used were used for the same purpose, which was to protect themselves during combat, but because samurais and knights fought in different types of wars, their armour was designed differently. Samurai armor…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Knights Dbq

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To begin Knights and Samurai have a lot of common traits, but they also have differences. Traits that they both share are, they are warriors who protect their land. But a difference is that they have different weapons,armor,training and different religions. While knights and samurai have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be given to the knight and this can be seen in their training,armor,and their Honor Code.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Samurai Knights Dbq

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Have you ever wondered what the similarities and the differences were between the Samurai and knights? Samurai and knights were very strong warriors in the medieval era, they had different cultural ideas, but Samurai and Knight also had similarities. Samurai and Knights were similar, but also different in some areas. The similarities between samurai and knights were greater than the differences. This can be shown by looking at three areas, social position, training and armor, and life, honor, and death.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Samurai and Knights were different but the similarities were greater because of their rankings, training, armor, fighting technique, code of honor, and death viewpoint. The Japanese called their warriors Samurai, and the Europeans called their warriors Knights. They both swore oaths of loyalty to noble lords and fought to the death to defend them. This happened at the same time even though Japan and Europe were thousands of miles apart.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Intro: Although the big empires, Europe and Japan were really successful feudalist empires and both had some similarities and differences during the 9th to 13th century, which made them unique empires in the world. Both of the empires have a similar concept of elite warriors, different treatment of women during the post-classical era, and a similar political structure of a hereditary caste system, which were the main reasons they became successful empires.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Europeans and the Japanese have many aspects of feudalism in common, but also many that differ. Their feudalisms are more differences than similarities. The differences include their cultural and political aspects. They have similarities in the social aspects.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since Japan had an emperor, feudalism developed because the emperor united the clans. Before feudalism, Japan was inhabited by many different clans. Clans fought each other frequently. Lives were lived in fear of attack. People were unhappy before feudalism and they started fighting for land. Feudalism gave samurai land. Rich landowners gave land for labor and crops. Feudalism is the bond of loyalty between a lord and those to whom he has given land.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Japan and Europe during the middle ages had both been affected by agriculture, social classes, and lack of power from the king/emperor. However, there had been major differences such as the role of women, and the different beliefs for a warrior between Chivalry (knights) and the Bushido code (samurais).…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both the Feudal and the Caste System stressed rankings in society and they each had a hierarchy. This however, was one of the many similarities and differences the two systems had. In the Caste system, people in each varna(social class) were born into his/her class and married within their own group. One could not move up the social ladder and one could only be one varna. In Feudalism, one could be a lord and a vassal at the same time one person could pledge allegiance to more than one lord at a time. Also, in the Caste system of India, the most important varna were the priests while in Feudalism, the king was at the top of the hierarchy. In feudalism, the lords and the knights made up the nobility which was similar in India's system, where the priests and warriors made up the nobility. In both, the class right below the emperor or king and the military are the most powerful and noble. In the caste system , women had hardly any rights and could not be priests or warriors, therefore they could never be in the upper class. In the feudal system, although ladies had few rights, women could be in the nobility. The noblewomen mainly sewed and raised the children. Likewise, the women in India were confined to household tasks as well. In both systems, there was no central government, in feudalism, each lord had his own rules on his manor and in India, the Kshatriyas, led the government, which was a council of elders for each village. There was no such thing as one government, instead there were several that were independent from each other. But unlike the feudal hierarchy where the king is on the top, in the caste system, the class after the first class is the one that heads the government. Also, in the feudal and the caste system, most people were the slaves. In the caste system, more than half the population consisted of the Pariahs(slaves) and in the feudal system, most people were serfs that were bound to the land. The serfs, the lords, the vassals and everybody had a…

    • 444 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to effectively trace the change in Government in Europe from 1400-1800, going back a little bit is necessary. Feudalism developed around the 8th century, but did not reach Europe really until the 10th century. It began to develop in France, and then spread to Spain, Italy, and later Germany and Eastern Europe. It then extended eastward into Slavic lands to the marches which were continually battered by new invasions, and it was adopted partially in Scandinavian countries. The important features of feudalism were similar throughout, but there existed definite national differences. Feudalism continued in all parts of Europe through the middle ages, ending around the 15th century. Basically, Feudalism divides a state up so that different people have control of the land and people in it. Kings held the most power; they granted land to Barons in exchange for soldiers. Barons allowed Knights to own land if they swore an oath of loyalty and devotion to serve in battle. The Barons were also in charge of the small communities and made all decisions. Knights then gave the serfs some pasture for farming, but they expected gifts in return. These often included money and goods.…

    • 2272 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics