Preview

Eu Competition Policy

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
521 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Eu Competition Policy
Short Paper: EU Competition Policy

Economic principles underlying EU competition policy

Effective competition between suppliers is important in the way that it allows to reduce prices, improve the quality of goods, and enlarge the quantity of items provided for the consumers due to the process of innovation. The European Commission’s purpose is to ensure fair competition in European markets. It promotes economic efficiency, an optimal allocation of resources, technical progress and the well-being of European consumers. To achieve this the European Commission has been granted wide powers. This is why principles were elaborated for companies within the UE to observe: they must respect some criteria in order not to be sanctioned by the European Commission. First of all, the competition between the companies must be unbiased. A company that is dominant in a market has no right to abuse its power to eliminate its competitors (e.g. the giant Intel tried to exclude competitors from the market of electronic chips, reducing the capacity of the competitors to compete with Intel in order to narrow consumer’s choices). Companies are not allowed to fix prices or share any markets (cartel: set a price higher than that resulting from free competition). Acting otherwise would be breaking the rules of pure competition and undermining market efficiency and consumer options. It is also an important thing that the largest companies may not exploit the smaller ones. That is to say large companies cannot use their bargaining power to force suppliers or customers not to trade with competitors (e.g. Microsoft who was sentenced to pay a fine for its practice of selling diverse software together, thus depriving customers of choice and thereby selling its software at a very high price). Large companies cannot merge if this allows them to control too much of the market. The mergers between different companies are taken into account when

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    One key factor in oligopolies is that each firm/company explicitly takes other firms’ likely responses into account when setting prices, launching new products, etc. For this reason, there is significant ‘friendly’ competition between firms. They each know that it is in their own best interests to maintain a stable price, for if they lower their prices, their competitors will do the same and knock out any advantage the original firm was hoping to gain with lower prices. If they raise their prices, the competitors will not follow suit and will therefore steal away all the customers of the higher priced product. Another key factor in oligopolies is that there are significant barriers to entry into this market. These barriers can include things such as high fixed costs, availability of resources, and brand loyalty. Many smaller companies simply do not have the cash or resources to compete with these large firms. Another characteristic of oligopolies is that the percentages of market shares change very little from year to year and are dependent upon introduction of new products or acquisitions of smaller companies. For this reason, a benchmark of…

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Businesses having market power can regulate the market on their own terms. They will have choice to charge any price from the customers. Therefore, they would often charge higher prices from the consumers and produce less as compare to the competitive outcome, causing in net welfare loss for the society. Further, due to lack of competition, firm’s incentive to contribute in innovations or cost reducing technology will get eroded; thereby productivity growth will get disadvantaged.…

    • 572 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To protect consumers there are specific regulations put into effect. In an Oligopoly market structure there is a small number of sellers. What one seller does, in terms of cost structure or product for example, can greatly affect the other firms in the oligopoly. Because of these, sometimes the sellers will join together to try and set certain price points or collude with each other. When this happens naturally, it is ok but regulations have been set forth that companies cannot contact each other about these. Regulations are intended to protect the consumer from the large firms working together to drive prices higher and higher. A great example of an Oligopoly is the Mobile phone market. In a monopoly, rather than multiple companies owning the market, only one company owns the market. If left unchecked this would allow that company to inflate the price of their goods. Some examples of this would be the gas company. Since you have to go with only one choice for services if left unregulated they could set the price as high as they wanted since they have no competition. Regulations on monopolies protect…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A company should not be allowed to drive out all the other competitors and be a monopoly. They should work their way to the top just like the other companies have to. They should have to be creative and innovative to gain customers instead of driving out the competition using illegal means. The United…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are a variety of different business structures that comprise the market in the world today. The most common ones found in the business world today are sole proprietorships, partnerships, and corporations. From these you will also find monopolies and oligopolies. Economists assume there are a number of different buyers and sellers in the market which leads to competition which allows prices to change in response to changes in supply and demand.(1) In many industries you there are substitutes for products, so if one type of product becomes too expensive the consumer can choose an alternative product that is cheaper, or one of better quality. This is called perfect competition within different companies. However, in some industries there are no substitutes for a product. In a market with only one supplier of a good or service, the producer can control the price meaning that the consumer does not have a choice, cannot maximize his or her total utility, and has very little to no influence over the price of the good or service they require. This is called a monopoly, where the single business is the industry. In slight contrast, you have the oligopoly which is at least two companies competing for market share. In an oligopoly, products are usually very similar, if not identical to each other, and in order to make their product more attractive they will lower their prices, forcing the other one out of the market until that firm lowers their price. Finally, the fourth type of business structure is called monopolistic competition. Like an oligopoly, these firms produce similar or identical products where substitute products usually aren’t available, although monopolistic competition is between many firms, where an oligopoly is usually two or three different companies controlling the market. In monopolistic competition, a firm takes the prices charged by its rivals as given…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    micro 1

    • 665 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The purpose of antitrust policy is to promote competition, which leads to lower prices. If a company had the power of price control that comes with being a monopoly, they would profit by picking the quantity/price that equals the highest revenue for their company. This would be likely a lower quantity and higher price than would prevail if there was competition.…

    • 665 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Elecriccity and Magnatism

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A hostile takeover defense wherein the target firm makes its stock less attractive to a potential acquirer is called…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In general without some kind of illegal dealings amongst competitors, it is difficult if not impossible to control the marketplace entirely. One business cannot gamble on what they think their competitors might do with any accuracy. Firms are often both buyers and sellers in the marketplace and are faced with the same competition for inputs as are others. It can also be said that larger firms have more resources for innovation and fear of competition fuels this activity.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antitrust behaviors tend to create a barrier to market entry and hence creating a natural monopoly or oligopoly. The firms in the oligopoly are then able to undertake price fixing whenever they want and increase their economic profits (Macgregor, 2012). Monopoly pricing is quite significant in antitrust activities, where the price curve is slopped upwards while trying to maintain or increase the demand curve. The firms were investigated for antitrust behaviors under the Sherman Act which is aimed at preserving unfettered and free competition in any trade activity. The antitrust laws under the Sherman Act proscribes any unlawful business and mergers practices in any industry where the act leave it upon the court to make the decision on which mergers or businesses are legal or illegal all based on the current facts (Macgregor,…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Competitive markets, monopolies, and oligopolies play a big role in the economy. We will be discussing the characteristics, price determination, output determination, barriers to entry, and the role in economy of each market structure.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Monopoly and Fair Return

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Another means to reduce competition within an industry is to manipulate price. Monopolists, being a price setter, could slash their price just to make it tougher for their competitor to survive. Other strategic methods could include increased advertisement to a level where the lesser and smaller firms will find impossible to compete against.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A company does not plan on merging with another company and although some mergers are voluntary other mergers are not. When a company is struggling, having financial difficulties and has used up all of its resources sometime it is in the best interest to merge. It is important for companies to understand the different mergers and to pick the best solution. Below team D will discuss the differences between a horizontal, vertical, and conglomerate merger and how those mergers differ from joint ventures.…

    • 593 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ECON205 Homework09 S09

    • 6135 Words
    • 72 Pages

    Monopolistic competition has the attribute that there are many firms competing for the same group of customers.…

    • 6135 Words
    • 72 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is often said that the goal of every vigorous competitor is to achieve a monopoly and reap the resulting profits. While this may be true, the antitrust laws are not intended to punish successful companies simply because of their success or large companies simply because of their size. Because we want consumers to get the best for the least through the free market, only conduct that excludes competitors, stifles innovation, limits supply or raises prices is prohibited. Obviously, monopolies that are obtained by unlawful means are not allowed. But monopolies that are lawfully obtained, such as those with superior products, prices or management, are only liable if they abuse their monopoly power and exclude, stifle or limit competition. The current Microsoft case raises all of these issues.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Game Theory

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After reading the Wall Street Journal’s article regarding game theory, one realizes that economics has many facets. Game theory is trying to anticipate what the competition will do or is contemplating. (Barnett, 1995). It 's really like playing chess. But unlike chess, there will be a winner and loser, you can have win-win and lose-lose situations in business. To avoid having retaliation from the competition, it is best to have those firms in the industry view the actions as beneficial to all, or at least to be nonthreatening. Companies viewing the competitor’s decisions as being in the best interest of the industry will also avoid a costly price war.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays