Preview

Ethics Case 6E: Finger Pointing And Blaming

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
967 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethics Case 6E: Finger Pointing And Blaming
Case 6E: Finger Pointing and Blaming
In any fundraising effort, it is critical that the Executive Administrator (often the person collecting the checks) and the Treasurer (the person balancing the books) trust one another. In this volunteer board, they did not. The lack of trust between these two individuals spelled disaster. How could we expect the public to trust us with their donations if we didn’t trust ourselves? We needed to find a way to build trust and hold them accountable for their actions.
To help build trust, I looked for some project that would require their collaboration, an activity that would be highly visible to the board and to the public in general — a project that would help stop the finger pointing and blaming and require teamwork. I considered a community-outreach program, a highly visible project that would hold them accountable for recording every penny raised and every penny spent. We had an ambitious, eight-week media plan for the program; I assured them that the media would be watching our every move. I assigned them key roles
…show more content…
I believe that bringing them together, giving them important responsibilities, and elevating their profiles not only helped elevate their self-esteem, but also increased their accountability and willingness to work as a team. In the end, they both seemed happier and their finger pointing and blaming

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Verdict Ethics

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “The Verdict” is a movie that deals with medical and legal ethics. Frank Gavin is an alcoholic who hasn’t won any of his cases in the past three years. Mickey, his former partner, gives him a medical malpractice case that is sure to settle for a large amount of money. The case of Deborah Ann Kay, a mother who was given anesthetic when she had just eaten inhaled her vomit and is now in a coma. The Donaheys, her sister and brother in law are hoping for a good settlement and Frank assures them that they have a strong case. While the case is going on he meets Laura, a woman at a bar who he falls in love with. Frank goes to visit Deborah Ann Kay in the hospital and is affected by her condition. He meets with the defendants who run the Catholic hospital where the incident happened. The defendants offer $210,000 to settle out of court but Frank declines. Frank feels this is his chance to do something right. Everyone was not happy with Frank declining the settlement. A lot of things start to go wrong for Frank in the case: the brother in law finds out how much the settlement was and how he denied it, his expert medical witness disappears, his substitute witness testimony is questioned, the defendant attorney Concannon has an expert legal team, and the Judge favors Concannon. Mickey finds out Laura is a spy for the opposing side and Frank punches her in the face. Frank then finds Kaitlin Costello Pryce, a nurse that was asked to change her notes on the admittance form after the incident to hide Dr. Towler’s error. Deborah Ann Kay had eaten 1 hour before admittance and no anesthetic is supposed to be given if so. Even though the testimony is not supposed to be used because of legal technicalities it stuns the courtroom. Frank then tells the jury a closing statement about justice and truth. Frank wins the case and the jury wants to increase the award.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this work ACC 410 Week 4 Discussion Question 2 Ethics Case you will find right answers on the following task: "Harris Fell, CPA and member of the AICPA, was engaged to audit the financial statements of Wilson Corporation. Fell had half-completed the audit when he had a dispute with the management of Wilson Corporation and was discharged. Hal Compton, CPA, was promptly engaged to replace Fell. Wilson Corporation did not compensate Fell for his work to date; therefore, Fell refused to allow Wilson Corporation…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Due by Day 7. Week 1 Exercises. Complete these problems and turn them in via the dropbox: P12-1, P12-7, P12-10, P12-14, E13-21, E13-22, and P13-6.…

    • 699 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Case Study Hcs/335

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    All medical facilities are responsible for given the best treatment as possible to their patients. This may include having the ability to react the correct way in a determinate situation, always thinking in the patient and the organization’s benefit. In medical field there many precautions that must be taken in order to prevent a real problem, such as malpractice and law suit cases. For this reason is good to apply “think before act” because it all starts having a good base of ethical decision.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethics Case Analysis

    • 1127 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “It depends on how careful they were, if they were there at all. We’re checking on that.”…

    • 1127 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 19 D1

    • 910 Words
    • 3 Pages

    My team’s objectives were to raise the awareness of our charity, raise over £1000 and raise as much money as possible and to run successful events. We were given £100 to start our events and had to budget what we spent. We had to decide our individual roles before we started planning any of the events so we all knew what we had to do but this was a bit of a struggle as it was hard to define, in the early stages, who had what roles. However, our team was effective because we all helped each other with different tasks and then all began to found out our strengths and our weaknesses. We all listened to each other and try to make everyone in the team feel welcome and not make them feel left out. For example, When Sandie joined our group it was a while after the team was formed so she may have felt a bit left out but we all tried to make her feel welcome and she took on the role of being in charge of all the health and safety and risk assessments for the event.…

    • 910 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Study 4 In a simulation training study, undergraduate participants will be asked to help another participant learn a list of words. In reality, though, the participant learning the words will be an experimenter confederate who purposely gets some of the words wrong. The actual participants will be told that they have to scold the learner whenever the learner makes a mistake. Anytime the participants hesitate in scolding the learner for mistakes, the experimenter will tell them that they must scold the learner or they will not receive credit for the experiment. The number of times the participants scold the learners will be recorded. Each participant will sign a consent form before the experiment begins.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Case Study

    • 824 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dr. Williams assistant Jerry does have the training but does not have the ability to make a call for a patient because if he prescribed the wrong dosage amount then there will be in trouble with the patient and also with HIPAA. It will not be in the best interest of Jerry to make this call for Dr. Williams without making a call to Dr. Williams first. In order for this to happen without breaking any laws, Jerry needs to have communication with Dr. Williams. To keep the integrity of office Jerry should ensure that the proper medication and make sure that it is the patient’s correct prescription if Dr. Williams gives the okay for jerry to provide the Valium for the patient. This might have to be a medication that this patient have to go without on his trip.…

    • 824 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Understand who is an employee and who is an independent contractor and know the risks of misclassification.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Case Study

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Medical laws have been put into place to protect not only the patient, but also the physicians, nurses, and medical office staff. The laws were put into place to ensure that these professionals follow the correct procedures and steps that only qualified persons follow. The definition of practicing medicine has also been clearly explained. Those professionals who do not abide by these set laws are therefore subject to punishment by law (Baxter 2005).…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Case Study

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Everyday health care workers around the world are faced with tough decisions. The law guides many decisions but some decisions require ethical considerations. Making good ethical decisions is not always as easy as it seems. Making ethical decisions is even harder when the primary intention is to be helpful, but it is beyond an employee’s qualifications.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics Paper Week 2

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “It’s invisible to us, but there is a crime wave going on, unprecedented in human history”. This is the opening line to “Counterfeit Culture,” a documentary about how counterfeit items enter the market, the kinds of goods normally purchased, and how it not only affects the global economy, but our own personal lives as well. In the last twenty years, counterfeit goods have exploded. This is because the way consumers do business has changed. Globalization has become a major influence on all markets and goods can now easily flow from one country to another, real and counterfeit.…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics Case Study

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the scenario Jerry McCall is Dr. Williams office assistant. Jerry has received training for a medical assistant and licensed practical Nurse. Although Jerry is handling the incoming calls while the receptionist is at lunch a patient of Dr. Williams had called in the office and stated that he needed two refill an antidepressant and Valium right away because he is leaving the airport within 30 minutes. The patient states that Dr. Williams always gives him a small supply of Valium when he goes to fly. Does Jerry have the correct medical training to refill this type of prescription? If it were another type of medication, such as high blood pressure to be ordered to take on daily basis would this make a difference for Jerry to call in the refill? I f Jerry calls in the prescription and the patient has a reaction while flying is Jerry protected from a lawsuit under the doctrine of respondeat superior?…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethical Case

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cruickshank, Garth & Romano (CGR) is a new real estate appraisal and consulting firm formed by Chris Cruickshank, Wayne Garth, and Richard Romano. The firm provides not only residential, industrial and commercial evaluations, but also consulting services and feasibility analyses in the National Capital Region (NCR). Richard and his two partners have worked for one of the four major NCR firms and are well known in the local real estate community. And recently, Richard has just completed a preliminary evaluation of a property for Watson & Musico, which is one of NCR’s major developers and property owners. However, John Mortimer from Watson & Musico is unsatisfied with the Richard’s evaluation price, he asks Richard to raise the value, otherwise they have no business. This situation is difficult for Richard, because he wants to satisfy John’s needs, but at the same time, he can’t ignore the ethical issue to do that.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Case Analysis

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This case presents a very typical situation that people encounter while working in the corporate environment. What is ethical, what is morally correct and what is just right out against the law are the questions that we all face while working in a corporate environment. Some of the ethical questions are governed by the law facing the situation. For example while working in an investment bank you most probably have access to inside information about upcoming deals that one could possibly use for personal monetary gain or you could act as a tippie and possibly share that confidential information with others. This kind of a situation is definilety governed by the law and you can actually be charged with various insider trading laws and possibly do some jail time as well. The other situation that is presented in the case is purely about ones ethical and moral standards. The analyst either has to compromise her loyalty towards her company B&B or towards her best friend Lori. While the situation presented is not a real zero-sum game, i.e., one player’s loss does not equal to the gain of the other player. When faced in a situation like this one has to think about what decisions can be made that will have the least affect on the players involved. The analyst should not look at the situation she faces as black or white. She should rather think about other options she might have to retain her friend’s loyalty while not compromising her loyalty towards her current employer. For example, Lori has already been laid off by her current employer, Universal group. The Universal group has already broken certain ethical and moral laws by not informing about the situation to B&B. So can the analyst come up with a situation where she can get Lori immediately and legally hired at B&B and convince her to share the information with B&B. In essence Lori will not have to feel guilty about not keeping the information confidential as has been laid off and the…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays