Preview

Ethical Use Of Drones Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
801 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethical Use Of Drones Essay
The Central Intelligence Agency or in other words known as the CIA have recently used drones to help detect and destroy terrorist before they do damage to our country and civilians. In the article Rethinking The Criterion For Assessing Cia-Targeted Killings: Drones, Proportionality And Jus Ad Vim, by Megan Braun and Daniel Brunstetter, the authors convey a determined tone to portray the aspects of drones scanning civilians to detect terrorist. “In his 2012 speech on the morality, legality and prudence of the USA’s use of drones to carry out lethal strikes against suspected terrorists, John Brennan (2012) (then White House counterterrorism adviser and now director of Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)) lauded the ability of drones to ‘conform to the principle of proportionality, the notion that the anticipated collateral damage of an action cannot be excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage.” The use of drones can prevent the military and terrorist to kill innocent people having nothing to do witht the feud going on. In the article, Rethinking The Criterion For Assessing Cia-Targeted Killings: Drones, Proportionality And Jus Ad Vim, by …show more content…
Drones can save lives as easily as they are able to take them away. They may be light and we may believe they may not cause damage to anything or anyone but when a drone is falling from the sky heading thousands of feet to the ground it can cause severe damage to people, buildings, and other sacred things we have. If drones are being designed to stop terrorist attacks and saves lives they should be tested numerous amount of times before they are anywhere near a town searching for possible suspects. People put their trust in the government to keep them safe, and if falling drones is what is going to kill them instead of a terrorist attack it would be okay to go against wanting to have drones circulation the
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of CIA Drone Strikes
    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of CIA Drone Strikes

    CIA drone strikes have the potential to decimate terrorist organizations in an inexpensive manner and reduces boots on the ground combat for American soldiers. Though, we need expansive and additional congressional oversight of drone strikes and CIA targeting. The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) is devoted to regulating and reviewing every aspect of the drone program, however, committee members are often met with denial and restriction of information. We need to make sure our drone program is met with regulation and preemptive strikes must be strictly reviewed in a legal manner prior to, in order to prevent the endangerment of innocent civilians, radicalization and mobilization of extremest retaliation, and to preserve the reputation…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    I the Current Administration's Policy on Drone Strikes Constitutional
    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I the Current Administration's Policy on Drone Strikes Constitutional

    On September 11, 2001, everything changed. Terrorism had never been seen on such a massive scale. As a result of the massive attacks on U.S. soil, changes had to be enacted. The fight against terror was now a global war effort. The War on Terror was not a popular choice, but it no one expected it to go on for this long. It is now being fought by technology, which led to the drones being used against U.S. citizens suspected of terrorism. The president can authorize these strikes with the claim that these citizens pose an imminent danger to the security of the United States. However, the Obama administration’s definition of imminent threat is vague and without oversight or any checks and balances. There are various military, governmental, and ethical concerns regarding the use of drone strikes ordered by the president. The use of drones is valid, but the administration has not presented any valid defense of their tactics, which paints a poor picture of Oval Office tactical policy.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drone Warfare: A Rhetorical Analysis
    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Drone Warfare: A Rhetorical Analysis

    Drone Warfare, enacted by George Bush and expanded on by President Obama to provide a haven for Americans against the terrorist group, al-Qaeda. The use of weaponized unmanned surveillance drones allowed for far better independent targeting decisions, rather than retrieving intelligence from sources within the real country where the warfare would take place. These strategic implications created a question among Americans, is the use of drones to target individuals right? This question has arisen due to a high number of civilian casualties, making it seem inhumane to do. However, Kenneth Anderson provides readers a strong argument as to why drone warfare is strategically effective in his article, “The Case for Drones” with his organization pattern,…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Using Drones
    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Using Drones

    When we're using drones, we're putting a meaningless drone's life at risk rather than a soldier's. Drones are just helpful technology that have no psychology connections to the world. Meanwhile, soldiers are humans with bonds to friends and family. A soldier dying and losing his connection to the world would have much more of an impact than a technological tool. If a drone were to get shot while entering a country to spy, we would just find a new drone. But if a soldier were to do the same, there would be a massive impact to the people the soldier had interacted with. Meaning drones are irrelevant to the…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Drone War Is Still A War Summary
    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Drone War Is Still A War Summary

    In the following “A Drone War Is Still a War” by Michael Kinsley speaks of the issue that using military drones causes civilian casualty and an unfair advantage. Kinsley addresses that we have already become used to the use of drones and that we treat the fact like a usual tactic of combat. The advantages of using drones is quite obvious. No American lives are put at risk, and the precision minimizes collateral damage, including the deaths of innocents who happen to be nearby. Kinsley states that the disadvantages are when a military option seems less painful, it is more likely to be resorted to. This makes it very easy for politicians such as President Barack Obama who are in favor of no troops on the ground to make a decision to use military drones.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Drone Killings
    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Drone Killings

    According to Kevin Zeese and Margaret Flowers, authors of “Anti-Drone Movement Grows: Ethics, Legality and Effectiveness of Drone Killings Doubted”, the use of drones by the U.S. military causes more trouble than what they are worth. Additionally, Zeese and Flowers reiterate their points by detailing attacks which “create situations in which violence begets violence”. However, as drones do collateral damage to objects around an established target, they are able to eliminate a large threat without endangering too many civilian and soldier lives. In fact, drones cause less damage to surrounding areas, use less resources, and are able to stay on for longer periods of times than soldiers. Hence this response paper challenges the viewpoints of Zeese…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The CIA Enhanced Interrogation Techniques
    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The CIA Enhanced Interrogation Techniques

    It would seem that the Drone Campaign was activated in it's place as an effort to combat terrorism. Even though the first drone strike was ordered in 2004 it wasn't until after the enhanced interrogation program was abandoned that drone strikes rapidly increased. An estimated 51 strikes occurred during the Bush administration ending in early January of 2009. The first drone strike under the Obama administration occurred on January 23, 2009. By December of that year the CIA recorded it's 100th drone strike.8 An estimated total of 350 drone strikes9 have been ordered under the Obama administration resulting in at least 2,400 deaths10. With the question of morality it's hard to comprehend that there are those that believe drone strikes are more moral than EITs. Especially when looking into the fact that strikes are ordered on 'suspected' terrorists while EITs are performed on those working with or known to be terrorists. All that aside collateral damage needs to be taken into consideration as well. The act of EITs doesn't result in collateral damage whereas it does with drone strikes. Even if this is dismissed it would be hard for one to argue that drone strikes provide more intelligence than EITs. After all, how can a suspected terrorist provide information if he's dead? Because the drone campaign is now targeting suspected terrorists some believe the United…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drones In Warfare Essay
    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drones In Warfare Essay

    Should drones be used in warfare? It’s necessary to learn about drones—what they are, and how they are used—before determining the answer. The Air Force calls them Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, or simply UVAs. There are dozens of them flying over countries like Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq, providing intelligence and surveillance. Since September 11, 2001, the US has been fighting the “War on Terror”, in which drones are used to kill suspected terrorists. Drones have changed the pattern of warfare and military outcomes.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drones Argumentative Essay
    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Drones Argumentative Essay

    On the other hand the argument can be made that drones are invading the privacies of people and are a nuisance that will lead to a more robotic sky than a natural one. These are true and are concerns for the future, drones have a number of more benefits than cons. Drones provide a more stress free life and will lead to a more productive society because of their ability to be mobile and compact. Drones are the way of the future and will be seen more in the news and in more controversial debates but they are the best way to go heading into the future so they should be allowed to…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drone Home Analysis
    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drone Home Analysis

    Drones are capable of being used by terrorists and other criminals for their bad intentions. For example, in the article “Drone Home” on page 7, Lev Grossman points out the possible security concerns revolving the domestic use of drones.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drones Civil Liberties
    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Drones Civil Liberties

    The notion that these drones will be a safer means of collection is in agreement everywhere, it removes individuals such as informants wearing wires from harm’s way and allows our law enforcement agencies to view locations for possible danger before attempting to serve criminal warrants. The question becomes are your civil liberties being violated with information being gathered as the drone passes over your location?…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Is Mary Shelley's Argument Of The Advancement Of Technology And Drone Warfare
    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Is Mary Shelley's Argument Of The Advancement Of Technology And Drone Warfare

    These machines destroy many enemy camps that contain the Al-Qaeda in places such as Somalia and Afghanistan. Drones also “have done so at little financial cost, at no risk to U.S. forces, and with fewer civilian casualties than many alternative methods would have caused.” (Byman). In the face of the riots all around the nation, Obama has called the reduction in America’s reliance to these machines even though they will still remain the government’s main weapon of choice for international warfare. These machines have done the task of killing the main leaders of the terrorist organization that has haunted us for many years and have denied the life of many of their sanctuaries. Knowing that this information was spread around the world, the citizens of America became more accepting of keeping the production of this new technology alive and to make it as strong as ever. Although it has not been the most approved program the military could use, the biggest advantage is that it actually works and it is the most efficient program for terminating enemy troops that the military has ever invested billions of dollars for. Many politicians and regular civilians “think it fair to say that the targeted killing program has been the most precise and effective application of firepower in the history of armed conflict.” (Hayden). From this quote, the reality of war has brought upon the competition of seeing which country’s military can create the strongest weapon possible. Since Al-Qaeda has started the War on Terrorism with America, Obama and the government have worked for many months on created these drones to help reduce the risk of terrorists towards the civilians. According to Michael Lewis, Drones used for war is actually the most humane forms of warfare that could…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drone Strikes In The United States
    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drone Strikes In The United States

    Since the attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 and various other terrorist threats, the United States has used unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), or drones, to eliminate terrorists or potential terrorists. The US should continue using and developing drones as combat weapons because they have less collateral damage than impractical alternatives, keep our own troops safe, and aide military generals with photography and mapping of foreign countries. Moreover, because UAV's cannot guarantee the safety of the innocent bystanders, drones obtain the reputation of creating more terrorists than they tend to eliminate and not only do drone strikes violate the sovereignty in other countries, they also violate the rights of basic human rights. Consequently, drones may be perceived differently in the eyes of Americans and Pakistanis.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Terrorism: Meaning of Life and Oxford University Press
    • 2952 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Terrorism: Meaning of Life and Oxford University Press

    In his article “Terrorism,” Michael Walzer describes terrorism as the indiscriminate murder of innocent people. He goes on to explain that terrorists have the objective of destroying the morale of a nation and instilling fear within a society by not targeting a specific group of people, but rather, targeting the population as a whole and killing “random” people. Walzer and many like-minded philosophers share the view that terrorism is wrong and is not justified under any circumstances; thus rendering it akin to murder. The preceding view is referred to as the “the dominant view,” as labeled by Lionel K. McPherson, because it is common to a great deal of people – many of who are not philosophers. McPherson attempts to discredit the notion that terrorism is wrong by relating it to modern warfare and showing the ways in which it is better in comparison. After reading the opposing arguments presented by Walzer and McPherson, I will be proving that although terrorism is not as immoral as war, it is still wrong.…

    • 2952 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Drone Strikes
    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Drone Strikes

    They soar overhead collect intel and are capable of destroying a whole city! Drones often fly in the sky and you don't even notice them because they seem like regular airplanes,but they are capable of much more than just flying around.These Unmanned Aerial Vehicles spy on you daily. Drones should be illegal because they kill innocent humans, promote terrorism, and are expensive to maintain.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics