Preview

Ethical Theories

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1071 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethical Theories
INTRODUCTION
Deontology and Utilitarianism are the two most dominant theories which forms the foundations of ethical analysis, because they are the viewpoints from which guidance can be obtained along the pathway to an optimum decision. Each theory emphasizes different points such as predicting the outcome and following one’s duties to others in order to reach an ethically correct decision. However, in order for an ethical theory to be useful, the theory must be directed towards a common set of goals. Ethical principles are the common goals that each theory tries to achieve in order to be successful. These goals include: Beneficence, Least Harm, Respect for Autonomy and Justice.

Deontology Deontology is an alternative ethical system that is usually attributed to the philosophical tradition of Immanuel Kant. It demands that actions, or means, themselves must be ethical. It argues further that there are excellent ethical norms and truths that are generally applicable to all people, beside, some actions are immoral regardless of their outcomes. Kant gives a 'categorical imperative' to act morally at all times and demands that individuals should act as though their actions would be made universal into a general rule of nature. It again believes that all people come to moral conclusions about right and wrong based on rational thought as it is moderately associated with the saying that 'the means must justify the ends.'
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism is an ethical system that is most often attributed to philosophers such as John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism believes that the most ethical thing to do is to maximize the happiness within a society. It focuses on the outcomes or ends of actions.
Utilitarianism is thus often considered a ‘consequentialist’ ethical outlook because it both believes that actions can be predicted and judged based on their outcomes. Thus, utilitarianism is often associated with the phrase ‘the ends justify the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Deontologists base their decisions about what’s right on broad, abstract universal ethical principles or values such as honesty, promise keeping, fairness, loyalty, rights, justice, compassion, and respect for persons and property.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism revolves around the concept of “the end justifies the means.” It believes that outcomes as a result of an action have a greater value compared to the latter, the morally right action is the action that produces the most good. It also states that the most ethical thing to do is to take advantage of happiness for the good of the society. This normative theory considers the overall good for all people and not just a single person.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism = an ethical philosophy that says the most ethical decision or course of action is the one that maximize utility.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarianism is the view that "what is good is determined by the consequences of the action". If it can be shown that an action benefits the greater amount, than it is good because it outweighs the small amount of harm that the action has caused (Pollock, 2004).…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The word deontology means the science of duty. Immanuel Kant, the philosopher most associated with deontology, defined a person as a reasonable, uncontrolled being who has the capacity to recognize moral laws and the power to decide to act morally or immorally, according to his/her duty (1785/2012). A person’s decisions are made by respecting others; this is our duty as humans. Kant further expanded on duty by distinguishing two types, hypothetical and categorical imperatives. Categorical imperatives are duties that are pure, outright and absolute. There are two questions Kant formulated in relation to categorical imperatives that can be asked when deciding if an action is right or wrong. Can this action be applied to every circumstance as universal law? Is the action being taken a means to an end? If the answer to the first is yes and the second no, then according to Kant, the action is morally right…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory: it holds that we ought to act in whatever way has the best consequences (i.e. the greatest "utility"). For most utilitarians, this means maximising the good and minimising the bad. Utilitarianism works on the fundamental assumption that we should always try to make as many people as possible as happy as possible (The Greatest Happiness Principle). Despite sometimes being unable to account for such fundamental moral concept as justice, rights, or freedom, Utilitarianism does have its strengths.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Deontology is an ethical theory whose name is derived from the Greek word “deon,” meaning duty or obligation. Most ethical theories are concerned with what is right or good, and they often attempt to find this by applying a rule or several rules that seem to fit with outcomes that we most commonly find are "good". Deontology is a non-consequentialist moral theory. While consequentialists, such as a utilitarian, believe the end will always justify the means, a deontologist will assert that the rightness of an action lays in the intent. It is the inherent nature of the act alone that determines its ethical standing. Deontology implies that certain actions are…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is a philosophy in which the ends justify the means, or in which the morality of an action is determined by the function that follows the action. Although Utilitarianism has many good principals that are both logical and appealing, the contradictions of the philosophy make it incompatible with Christian ethics. The moral standards that utilitarianism is supposedly based on only work when a person doesn't consider the personal emotions that might hinder or get in the way of what the end result of the action is. The function may not be changed or diverted according to the philosophy. It also cannot change when someone does not think about the bigger picture in perspective to the function.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarianism theory states that in order for something to be ethical the output must make the most of the good. Its focus is on creating pleasure while taking away the pain. The goal of this theory is to make as much good in the end that is possible. The viewpoint is “that our actions should be ethically determined by the consequences likely to result from them” (Mepham 31). This states that the outcomes of people’s acts determine if they are ethical or not. The consequences need to produce good, wholesome results.…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secondly, the article identified the following five sources of ethical standards: the Utilitarian Approach, the Rights Approach, the Fairness or Justice Approach, the Common Good Approach, and the Virtue Approach. The authors state that using these five approaches helps peoples define what standards of behavior can be considered ethical. Once one puts all these approaches together, there are still problems to be solved. One of the problems is that it is almost impossible to agree to the same set of human and civil rights, and another is that the approaches to ethical behavior do not have the same explanation for particularly difficult situations.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is the belief of ‘the greatest good for the happiest and greatest number that is the measure of right and wrong’. Utilitarianism can be characterized as a quantitative and reductionist approach to ethics. It is a type of naturalism. It can be contrasted with deontological ethics, which does not regard the consequences of an act as a determinant of its moral worth; virtue ethics, which primarily focuses on acts and habits leading to happiness; pragmatic ethics; as well as with ethical egoism and other varieties of consequentialism.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy Ethical Theories

    • 4941 Words
    • 142 Pages

    An absolutist is a rule that is true in all situations. The rule says things are basically right, no matter what the circumstances, there is no room for manoeuvre. What makes an ethic deontological is that it pays no regard to consequences, as the name makes clear, coming from the Greek duty. For example stealing is always wrong. It makes no difference who does it, what the reasons were, what culture they live in o whether it took place hundreds of years ago. Stealing is just one of those things which is universally wrong and knows that even if they don’t obey the rules. Strengths Weaknesses…

    • 4941 Words
    • 142 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Meanwhile deontology pertains to rights, duties or obligations. It concerns the morality of the action that is being performed (or not performed) rather than the results deriving from said action. In Kantian deontology,…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Modern Ethical Theories

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When we discuss modern ethics there are two theories that emerge above all others and although both are supported they are often controversial in nature. Ethical Egoism states that we should put ourselves and our interests before those of others leading to the conclusion that if we do things that are only in our own self interest then we have achieved morality. Psychological Egoism presumes that we always put ourselves and our interests before others and that every act is motivated only by our own self interest. Even when an act appears on the surface to be totally unselfish it is in all reality a selfish act. Simply feeling good about doing an “unselfish act” makes it selfish. Ethical and Psychological Egoism may seem similar at first glance but they are actually quite different. We will discuss these two theories and their differences, compare the doctrines of motivation for both and discuss selfishness and self interest.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Approaches to ethics

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Judges the morality of an action based on the action’s observance to a set of rules…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics