Ethical Issues In Hockey Essay

Sports such as Hockey and Football have a tolerance for violence whether it’s body checking a player to the walls or tackling an opponent. These actions are justifiable to the fact that it’s part of the game, because such actions help the player to an advantage of obtaining the ball but there are limit to these rules. These actions are only made for the sole purpose of the sport and playing within the game and rules but using this advantage to other purposes such as harming another player without a justifiable reason is unethical and moreover even illegal. Violent behavior found in certain sports may be approved if it’s according to its rules but if players decide to use this upperhand for their violent actions it shouldn’t be certified
Hockey has its rules but in certain cases where Chara slams Pacioretty in an angle at the glass pavement during 2011’s Boston vs. Habs, for example, has the referees become more flexible with its rules. The reason to believe there is a “double standard” in hockey is because the rules for hockey are much less strict than sports like soccer and for this reason this entertains the hockey fans for how much more flexible and exciting it may be. As for the reason of its “double standard”, the referees may realize the limits to which the players are taking the rules are very dangerous as such they penalize the players for their actions and this causes for its “double standard”. Generally the fans are the top priority in entertaining and the “double standard” rule benefits them the most. They’re getting satisfied with the game because of its flexible rules but at the same time they believe the players are protected throughout because it’s “Part of the Game”. Players also benefit from this rule because they can perform a violent action to their opponent while at the same time believing that they have a chance of not getting penalized