Preview

Estate Satire

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1926 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Estate Satire
Monika Pareek
Professor Abraham
English A
10th February 2014
Chaucer And Estate Satire
The meanings of the word “estate” defined by the Middle English Dictionary is ‘a class of persons, especially a social rank or a political class or group; also a member of particular class or rank’. The idea of the "estates" is important to the social structure of the Middle Ages. (Mann, Jill. Chaucer And Medieval Estate Satire. Introduction. London: Syndics of Cambridge University Press, 1973. 1-7.Print.)
Feudal society was traditionally divided into three "estates". The "First Estate" was the Church (clergy = those who prayed). The "Second Estate" was the Nobility (those who fought = knights). It was common for aristocrats to enter the Church and thus shift from the second to the first estate. The "Third Estate" was the Peasantry (everyone else, at least under feudalism: those who produced the food which supported those who prayed and those who fought the members of the First and Second Estates). The categories defined by these traditional "estates" were gender specific; they were defined by what a man does for a living as much as by the social class into which he was born. Women were classified differently. Like men, medieval women were born into the second or third estate, and might eventually become members of the first. But women were also categorized according to three specifically "feminine estates": virgin, wife and widow. It is interesting to note that a woman 's estate was determined not by her profession but by her sexual activity: she is defined in relationship to the men with whom she sleeps, used to sleep, or never has slept. The rigid division of society into the three traditional "Estates" begins to break down in the later Middle Ages. During the rise of Chaucer (mid-fourteenth century), one sees the rise of a mercantile class (mercantile = merchants) in the cities, i.e. an urban middle-class, as well as a new subdivision of the clergy: intellectuals



Cited: Chaucer, Geoffrey. Riverside Chaucer. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988. Print. Mann, Jill. Chaucer And Medieval Estate Satire. London: Syndics of Cambridge University Press, 1973. Print. Fein, Susanna and David Raybin. Chaucer Contemporary Approaches. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University, 2010. Print

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    This last class was divided into two groups consisting of free peasants and indentured servants. The free peasants held their own businesses and paid rent to the lords in order to use their lands. The indentures peasants, however, where bound to the land in which they labored to earn their stay. When the lands changed ownerships, the peasants living in those lands immediately came under the jurisdiction of the new lord. That class was under the control of these nobles who squeezed the peasantry hard in effort to maintain their luxurious lifestyle (Tignor p 428).…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1700 and 1789, around 50,000 commoners were able to afford a noble title. The third estate was the common people, essentially everyone else. But the third estate wasn’t just peasants, it was literally everyone who wasn’t a noble or part of the clergy. This meant wealthy lawyers, doctors, and businessmen were all still part of the third estate.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 9 outline

    • 3964 Words
    • 16 Pages

    The clergy was the First Estate; the nobility the Second Estate; and everyone else, from the wealthiest…

    • 3964 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A: In the medieval period, English society was divided into three general categories, known as estates (a term which is derived from the Latin word status). These three estates consisted of the clergy (officials in the Christian Church), the nobility (those holding honorary titles, including members of the military), and the peasantry (or laborers who belonged neither to the clergy or nobility). Together, these three estates were meant to ensure that all members of the population could expect material…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Three estates or classes were, in order, the Clergy, the Nobles and then Third Estate. There are differences between all the classes. The top two classes, the Clergy and the Nobles had more similarities than the Third Estate did with the other two.…

    • 568 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales, differences between characters and connections between the tales themselves produce humour and irony. One of the best examples of irony and humour between figures’ in the Canterbury Tales is in the parallels that exist between “The Miller’s Tale” and “The Knight’s Tale.” The Miller tells the audience he will “requite” “The Knight’s Tale” (Chaucer 3119). The Miller requites the Knight not only in the form of his tale but also in the similarities that exist between the two tales. The Miller seems to attempt to show the Knight a more realistic version of the Knight’s tale of an epic romance. Through examining both similarities and differences between the two tales, one can show “The Miller’s Tale” as a social commentary against “The Knight’s Tale” of courtly love.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Prior to the eleventh century, major distinctions between social classes did not exist in the western European societies, and in the later Middle Ages, clearer social classes developed. In the Middle ages, feudalism was the basis by which the upper nobility class maintained control over the lower classes, as a result of the collapse of the Roman Empire. It was an economic, and social system in which the king gave a portion of his land and protection to a peasant in return for the service on the manor. The system came about, for the most part, because during his reign of England, King William had two major hardships: he couldn't keep the people from rebelling and he couldn't take care of all the land.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cooper 1989: Helen Cooper, Oxford Guides to Chaucer—The Canterbury Tales, United States: Oxford University Press…

    • 2334 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Estate were made up of the Church and the nobility. The Third Estate was the class that…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The lowest strata of society remained the peasant. The peasant supported all other estates of society not only through direct taxation but in the production of agriculture and the keeping of livestock. The peasant was the property of whomever he was subject to. Be it bishop, prince, a town or a noble, the peasant and all things associated with him were subject to any whim whatsoever. Countless taxes were exacted on the peasant, forcing more and more of his time to be spent working on his lord’s estate. Most of what he produced was taken in the form of a tithe or some other tax. The peasant could not hunt, fish or chop wood freely in the early sixteenth century as the lords had recently taken these commonly held lands for their own purposes. The lord had rights to use the peasant’s land as he wished; the peasant could do nothing but watch idly by as his crops were destroyed by wild game and nobles on the chivalric hunt. When a peasant wished to marry, he required the lord's permission as well as having to pay a tax. When the peasant died, the lord was entitled to his best cattle, his best garment and his best tool.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: Bisson, Lillian. Chaucer and the Late Medieval World. (49-99). St Martin 's Press. New York. 1998…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This led him to keep a close watch on her whenever possible. The Miller's main…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    (MIP-1) Women Serfs, were very much like any serf in the feudal society, however there were a few differences given that women were not equal to men. In the Middle Ages, the feudal society was mostly male dominated (Smith 3). Men held most political, social, and religious authorities (Nardo 56). Their roles included knights, vassals, kings, dukes, barons, councilmen, friars, and monks (Nardo 56). However, women only had influence in one area, that was property ownership and economic management (Smith 3). In some places, women could inherit land under the law and tradition. The flip side to this was that in order to protect the land a women owned, she relied on military protection, from the male knights, and through marriage (Smith 3). (CS)…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales, he depicts Medieval society from the viewpoint of multiple characters. At times, the characters seem to conflict in their perceptions of certain themes, such as gender roles. For instance, in The Knight’s Tale, the central female figure, Emelye, vehemently opposes the idea of marriage at first. Yet in The Wife of Bath’s Tale, the central female figure, a fairy, actively pursues marriage with an unwilling knight. It may seem that the differences in these characters demonstrate an ambiguous stance on the roles of women and marriage, but a synthesis their depictions shows Chaucer’s perception of those themes. Despite giving female characters in both…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Middle Ages Dbq

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Feudalism was very popular in the Middle Ages. Feudalism was when land owning nobles became independent of kings and princes. The classes of feudalism defined the classes of the Middle Ages these classes include, lords, vassals, fiefs, manors, and serfs. The feudal obligations between a lord and his vassal were simple. The lord provided the vassal with land and protection and the vassal provided the lord with military service and ransom.(Doc. 4) For example “I, John of Toul. Make known that I am the liegeman of the count and countess of Champagne… I will aid the count.”(Doc. 2)…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays