Preview

Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
572 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control
This article is about the main issue of gun control, and how it is enough. The article mainly focuses on two sides. The first side is that everybody should have guns from criminals to citizens. The other side is how nobody should have guns, besides law enforcement. First, this piece will discuss the pros and cons of how everybody should have guns. Then we will go on to identify some of the pros and cons about how nobody should have guns, bedsides law enforcement, and then conclude with my final opinion about the gun control issue. In the article it talks about how every person, rather it be criminal or citizen should own a gun. The argument given is for self-defense, and how criminals are less likely to attack a person who has a weapon on hand. Also, it goes with the second amendment of the right of bear arms. The example given in the article is how in Egypt because Egyptians had guns they were …show more content…
For instance, it takes the police some time to come to someone’s rescue, or help them. Within that time the person is already robbed or is dead. If that person had a gun or weapon, that person could have not been dead, or not been robbed.
Ultimately, I agree with the side of only law enforcement having guns. Although, I know this can only happen in a utopia, it is still worth the try. I feel if the government works hard and tries to find these illegal underground gun stops, we might be safer then each individual having a gun.
All in all, this article had very good information about the gin control issue that is faced currently. This article showed many governor and states have different views on gun control. Ranging from some states being may issues states for guns to unrestricted states for guns. Also, the idea of what is enough gun control will keep on pondering, until there is a new amendment. Ultimately, it goes on a person’s decision of having a gun, and deciding where to use the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    While comparing the two articles ‘The Case for Banning Guns’ and ‘The Case Against Banning Guns’ the one that makes the most sense and is the most logical is the latter choice. While both sides made realistic arguments, the author, Paul Waldman, choice of words point the reader to believe that he realizes his view is unobtainable. Throughout the second article, the author, Shiha Dalmia, had many valid points, including the example used to reiterate her point about the fact that the biggest mass murders in America in the entire last century have been done without the use of guns.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are several opinions stating that firearms are beneficial to own in one’s lives. In the article “The Accessibility of Guns Protects Lives,” written by David M. Huntwork informs us that gun protection should not be overlooked as a negative aspect, but instead as a positive source. David’s opening remark stated, “Empowering…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Winkler even states “On the Other hand , gun advocates are too quick to assume that laws allowing guns on campus will discourage mass murderers.” Even in Arizona, which was an example in the article, it had passed a liberal carrying law, and with that, there was still a shooting of a man hurting a representative and killing six other people along with it. This remark goes back to the last paragraph and how it could make a setting bitter and uncomfortable instead of having people feel safer because they would be able to “fight back”. Also in a shooting that could happen at a school people could have a gun on them and still would not be able to protect himself, but also can shoot a bystander because they could have thought it was the shooter. This reasoning is also a representation of how having a gun to protect oneself is a good idea. “...Policeman or other students with guns might not be able to differentiate among gunman...”.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control advocates focus on the serious negative effects on gun availability on safety, while gun ownership advocates emphasize the lawful use of guns and their place in our history and culture. While our history and culture is important we need to address the current national problem in order to live in a safe enough society. In an effort to stabilize and decrease firearm related injuries and deaths in the U.S. a strong federal law to control guns is needed. In the bigger picture, we people will see the United States, as a Nation, as a better safer place to live in and not to die…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1990, an article titled, "The Right to Bear Arms" was published in Parade Magazine. The article, written by former Chief Justice of the United States (1969-86), Warren E. Burger addressed issues on the second amendment. In this article, he examines the needs of society to have guns when the Bill of Rights was drafted versus modern day society, using logic and history to appeal to his audience. While not necessarily taking a standpoint against the second amendment's right given to bear arms, he criticizes the regulations on handguns, suggesting there should be more in place in order for levels of violence to decrease.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control is one of the most debatable topics in present day. Gun control refers to laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms. These firearms include handguns, machine guns, rifles etc. People use these weapons for multiple reasons. Some use it for sport, for example: hunting or practicing at the gun range. Others buy it for protection while others use it for violence. Having a firearm requires responsibility. The person that wields a gun is responsible for his safety or others. They are also responsible for using a weapon against someone. According to procon.org, ''The United States has 88.8 guns per 100 people, or about 270,000,000 guns, which is the highest total and…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Only through the blatant abrogation of explicit constitutional rights is gun control even possible. It must be enforced with such violations of individual rights as intrusive search and seizure and the most severely victimizes those who most need weapons for self-defense. With various gun control proposals on different agendas with the including of licensing, waiting periods, and bans on “Saturday night specials” are of little or if any value as crime-fighting measures because with the banning of guns to reduce crime makes more logic as banning alcohol to reduce drunk driving and with the persuasive evidence shows that civilian gun ownership can be a powerful deterrent to…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate over the restrictions of gun control is centered on the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which gives people the right to bear arms. Gun control supporters believe that this explicit right does not extend to ownership of military-style firearms. For example, groups like the National Rifle Association argue that gun control infringes on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control is an on-going debate because each year more people are killed by the use of guns. However, guns are not the result in the number of homicides each year, the problems rests with the irresponsible gun users. Gun Control would do nothing but harm America because guns offer protection and security…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pro Gun Control Essay

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What is gun control? Gun control is when the government puts rules and regulations on where one can bring guns. Governments also limit the amount of guns one owns. Guns are a way to protect our families, stop criminals, and a way to hunt to provide food for families. Some people abuse guns and bring harm to others which is horrible. There should not be a law on gun control. This law restricts those who own them to protect themselves and restricts them from having a firearm. Keeping guns in the United States is the best option for America.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Studies have shown that houses which holds firearms become victims for robberies as thieves not only try to steal money and other precious things but also the weapons and those weapons might be sold in black-markets or might engaged in some…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After massacres at schools across the country everyone should be able to feel safe in public, even if this means one must carry a gun. Citizens should be able to have the reassurance that they are able to fight back if an attack against them or a school massacre were to happen, especially since one cannot entirely rely on the police force. On average, the police takes 11 minutes to arrive at the scene of the crime. In those 11 minutes it takes for the police to arrive, if one does not have a weapon of self defense, one could get seriously hurt. Also, it is a citizen’s right by the second amendment to carry guns, so concealed weapons do not break the law in any way.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that control on firearms will reduce crime. But I don't believe in taking away firearms from law abiding citizens is the answer to gun control. We need more regulations put into place on who, when, how and where guns can be purchased. I don't believe you should be able to go to a weekend rinky dink gun show and be able to walk out with a weapon regardless of make or caliber. I think that you should not be allowed to legally buy a firearm, or any accessory for said firearm until the age of 21. Pawn shops and places like Walmart should not be allowed to sell firearms above a certain caliber, or semi autos. Bolt action rifles, shot guns and revolvers would be fine at sporting good stores and such. Specialized weapons such as semi autos like the Ak-47 or Ar-15 should only be sold by authorized stores and retailers.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Their argument is that after the government passed a gun control act in 1968, the crime rate climbed up in robbery cases from 138,000 in 1965 to 376,000 in 1972, while murders with guns increased from 5,015 to 10,379 in the same period according to the Census Bureau. They cite an example about New York, where the restrictions on guns are strong; the crime rate is higher than in Vermont, where gun controls are low. Also, they state where gun control is strictly enforced, illegal gun ownership is much higher. By allowing guns for citizens, the crime rate will decrease. They also considered this an economical solution for protection. (Benedict D. LaRosa)…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem being crimes committed using fire arms. What the Government fails to recognize is that criminals do not abide by the laws, taking weapons away from law abiding citizen will only give the criminals more means to do harm. There is a law against braking and entering but criminals still do it. There is a Law against stealing, yet criminals still continue to steal. So what will taking guns away from Law abiding citizens do? Absolutely nothing other than make citizens more vulnerable to the criminals. While a study was found between 1980 and 2009, shows the States with restrictions on carrying concealed fire arms had higher gun-related murders(ProCon #2). This will also be the first and only Law that amplifies the problem rather than helping. If criminals want to have guns they will find a way to get them. Taking away legally owned guns does not get rid of the illegally owned guns. The Gun Control Law will give criminals the upper hand, they will be more likely to shoot innocent people to get why they want, expectably know there will not be bullet fired back at them. The reason Gun control has not affect on murders is because the killing is not being done people with legally owned…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most debatable topics in the United States is the availability of guns. The debate on the topic of gun laws focuses on those who believe that owning guns is a Constitutional right while others believe that owning guns is a leading cause of much of the violence within the United States. However, there is a balance between the two debates that will lead to a better conclusion to the topic. Making guns illegal will only lead to criminals possessing illegal firearms while the law abiding citizens will be faced with the threat of criminals with firearms while they have no source of protection. At the same time, the current laws do not require every state to follow laws that would allow for the government to ensure that the firearms do not legally fall into the hands of criminals or those not responsible to own firearms.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays