Preview

Essay On Sanity Board

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
693 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On Sanity Board
Issue(s): What is a sanity board, and how does one request it? Is Rule 706 for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.), which can be found in the Manual for Courts-Martial (M.C.M.), the applicable rule for sanity board cases?

Short Answer: A sanity board is considered to be an inquiry into the mental capacity or mental responsibility of an accused individual who is serving in the United States Military. Sanity boards are governed under Rule 706 of the Rules for Courts-Martial, located in the Manual for Courts-Martial. Inquiries can be requested by several different parties including attorney (from either side of), the judge presiding, or the investigating officer. When requesting an inquiring the request is done by writing to the individual authorized to order the inquiry¹.

Statement of Facts: Sergeant Payne has previously been known to display odd behavior that is considered not normal throughout the years. Most people, who know or have met Sergeant Payne often wonder what is wrong with him.
…show more content…
Sanity boards are an evaluation of a board made up of at least one physician or clinical psychologist, along with others. Sanity boards are governed by Rule 706 of the Rules of Court-Martials. According to Rule 706 a sanity board inquiry can be requested either before charges have been officially referred or after the referral of charges². After referral requests for evaluation of the offender may be made any time after the referral of charges but before the first session of the court-martial hearing². A request for a sanity board can be requested by several different people. These people can include: attorneys on either side, the judge presiding over the court-martial, or the investigating officer. When deciding to request an evaluation under Rule 706, the request is done so through written communication to whoever has the authority in authorize it, usually the judge

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Insanity Defense

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The insanity defense is one of the several legal questions that might be raised in a criminal case. This type of defense in a criminal case focuses on the defendant’s cognitive and mental state at the time of the offense. Due to this speculation, the questions focuses on whether the defendant is criminally responsible for his or her behavior due to the mental state at the time of the offense (Hugaboom, 2002). Also, additional questions are required to determine psychological evidence might also be included in the case. The psychological issues will include the defendant’s competency to stand trial, the mental conditions that are relevant in consideration of the sentencing, and competency to waive rights. According to Hugaboom (2002), insanity…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 69.) These nine clauses above are directly from the United States Military Code of Justice, which are military law.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The insanity defense is not covered as its own constitutional right, although it faults under the due process clause in the 5th and 14th amendments. The states define their own elements for what constitutes insanity, using the common law as a guideline. Mens rea—Latin for the “guilty mind” — is one of the necessary elements for insanity. If found incompetent, the person is usually charged to…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eddie Routh Case Study

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two cases with defendants who both have plead not guilty by reason of insanity, have been given two different rulings despite the fact that they both have mental illnesses. In James Holmes’ trial, Holmes killed twelve people and injured more than seventy in his local movie theater. Holmes was found not guilty by reason of insanity, but a psychiatrist claimed him to be legally sane, but had a mental illness.(Ingold and Phillips) If Holmes was ‘legally sane’ but mentally ill then he should not have been found not guilty by reason of INSANITY. In the Eddie Routh case, he was given a life sentence and had suffered severe PTSD and schizophrenia prior to the crime. (Banner) According to the Model Penal Code would not Routh's mental illness be the cause of his crime and excuse him from the sentence? The court is acting unjust, inconsistent, and illogical in their rulings to these defendants who both have records of mental illness, or claims of mental illness, but one walks into the prison at the end of the day and the other walks into the mental ward. The rules currently in action allow judges to rule based on what seems to be their unlogical personal opinion after maybe reviewing the mental illness records, maybe not, their pigheaded personality will…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Rosenhan is known for the classic, yet controversial study “On Being Sane in Insane Places” of progress within the mental health field. Rosenhan’s study (1973) of eight people with no previous history of mental illness were admitted at various mental hospitals in America and complained of individual symptoms (auditory illusions, e.g., ‘thud’). He investigated whether psychiatrists could distinguish between those genuinely mentally ill and not. Each pseudopatient behaved normally, and symptoms were not re-reported. However, the average length of hospitalisation was 19 days. This shows context has a powerful role in determining how behaviour is labelled. This led to question the truth in psychiatric diagnoses. The predominant issue was unauthorised diagnoses and needless treatments for a fictional mental illness tolerably accepted. Today, it is the difficulty in gaining treatment for real symptoms of mental disorders.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This paper will include what the insanity statutes are in Ohio, the state that I live in. I will also talk about how often the insanity defense is used in the United States. As well as how successful this defense is. I will also discuss if psychologists should give their ultimate opinion in regards to sanity cases as well as the ethical issues that may rise from their opinions. Lastly, I will discuss how difficult it is to provide adequate psychological care for mentally ill patients while they are incarcerated in prison. The care they would have received had they been institutionalized in a mental hospital instead would have resulted in fewer deaths.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The author of this paper argues several reasons why the insanity plea should be changed or either eliminated. The reasons are considered and supported by evidence. The conclusion states that insanity should be altered or eliminated for the safety and well being of society.…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corrections Task Force

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The task force has been assigned the mission of creating a training program which will detail the ways that staff for the correction facility are better able to manage the mentally ill offender population safely and effectively. This will review the following information to better explain how this may be accomplished: information vital to improve staff effectiveness for secure and safe operations, sill sets required for staff working with the population, and any notable information from research in both historical and emerging trends.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In a publication “The Essential Elements of a Mental Health Court (2007)” explains that how mental health courts are a recent and rapidly expanding phenomenon. This interpretation discusses in the late 1990s only a few courts were accepting cases of this nature. Since then numerous mental health courts have been established to examine defendant’s cases that suffer with a mental illnesses. According to the publication “The Essential Elements of a Mental Health Court (2007)” these courts emphasized their differences and their diversity is undeniable; the similarities across mental health courts share common characteristics.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The issue of competency of a defendant is typically raised by his or her defense attorney. When a forensic expert is called in to do an evaluation of an adult, he typically examines prior mental health records and social histories, as well as any criminal history, of the defendant before interviewing him and employs the use of specialized forensic assessment tools such as the Competency Assessment Interview, MacArthur Competency Assessment Tool-Adjudicative Competency (Mac-CAT), and the Interdisciplinary Fitness Review-Revised, which all take the form of semi-structured interviews. In their face to face evaluations, forensic experts must first attempt to develop a rapport with the defendant, obtain critical data necessary to make a determination, evaluate for malingering, and obtain information from third parties. The majority of adults found incompetent are found to suffer from mental retardation or another mental illness. If an individual is deemed competent, the trial will proceed as scheduled; if…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why does the mental health of the woman in The Yellow Wallpaper, written by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, seem to deteriorate throughout the entirety of the short story? The woman does not seem to be very ill; but, as time progresses, it can be assumed that her state of mind is slowly worsening. While her husband, John, is a physician, it is mentioned multiple times by the woman, that he may have misdiagnosed the illness that she does seem to possess. The images the woman sees in the wallpaper represent how unstable her mental health is, the way in which the wallpaper mirrors the image of her life, and how her mental health slowly fades when isolated from society for a long period of time.…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A large portion of society opposes the insanity plea because they believe that criminals falsely enter the plea to be acquitted of a crime. According to the court, there is doubt in the defense and their ability to properly diagnose an offender. Psychiatrists may have disparate diagnoses and this takes away from the legal value of not guilty by reason of insanity (Doherty). In past cases, the jury is not quick to acquit a criminal, due to insanity, because of the small chance that the offender may be falsely claiming insanity to avoid a longer jail sentence (Vatz “Insanity”). This is not a valid argument because the insanity plea is used only 1% of the time and even then, it is not always accepted (Doherty). The plea seems relatively apparent…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    a federal court in which criminal proceedings are pending to make a finding regarding the mental competency of the accused to stand trial, may not make a determination that an accused is mentally competent merely because he is oriented to time and place and has some recollection of events; the test must be whether the accused has sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding and whether he has a rational as well as a factual understanding of the proceedings against him.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the many issues that trouble the American Justice System today is that of the insanity defense. This defense has been brought in front of courts for years and has caused massive debate. The insanity defense plays a powerful role in our society which begs for justice. However some look upon it as a god sent, while other feel it is the enemy. ?The insanity defense is rooted in a basic principle of justice: that it is unfair to hold persons responsible for their actions when they don?t know, or cant control, what they are doing? (Worth 16), but is it true that people really don?t ?know? what they are doing; and if so should they still be punished for it? Many who share negative feelings towards the insanity defense believe that it is not a defense in the victims case but a defense to aid the perpetrator.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Insanity Defense

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It has called for a new definition of the word “insanity” and has caused many new standards to be put in place. A new standard, for example, is the competency test. All jurisdictions require that criminals must be competent to stand trial, meaning that the accused knows the nature of their actions and understand that what they did was wrong, if they cannot do that they will be found to be mentally incompetent to stand the trial (FindLaw). This, however, does not mean that the person is immediately found not guilty or innocent. The person will receive treatment until they are competent enough to stand trial. The insanity defense also called for a reform act in 1984, stating that the defendant must be unable to understand the “nature and quality of the wrongfulness of his acts” (FindLaw). It also states that a mental disease does not constitute as an argument. Lastly, the insanity defense has called for a test that decides if the criminal is mentally ill, however, guilty. The guilty but mentally ill verdict allows criminals who are mentally ill to be found liable for their actions and receive treatment while in jail or be sent to a mental hospital. Once they are seen to be well enough, they will be sent to prison to serve their…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays