Essay On Free Will In Hamlet
Hamlet is generally regarded as Shakespeare’s magnum opus, sometimes it is even referred as the highest literary product of human genius. Critics have always been argued on the interpretation of Hamlet and even after more than 400 years, yet these argues still going strong. One of the most controversial that topic for critics since the beginning is the interpretation of the third act of Hamlet, where many critics themselves baffle because normal interpretations will make Hamlet subsequent actions irrational and impossible to explain. Many will use insanity to explain Hamlet actions. However, we will presume that Hamlet is staying sane throughout the course of the story. This paper is an attempt at interpreting the purpose and significant of
…show more content…
However, that is the fact that he has to face since his meeting with the Ghost. Since the beginning of the story, Hamlet has suspicious about Claudius being the killer; however, after meeting with the Ghost, all of the Hamlet’s actions are based on the “fact” that Claudius murder the king by pouring poison through his ears. This including The Mousetrap. Meeting with the Ghost makes Hamlet discard all of his previous postulations and putting his mind on the direction that the Ghost pointed to. The Ghost also forbids Hamlet from any murderous intentions toward Gertrude, he also order Hamlet to stop Gertrude’s relationship with Claudius.
Later, in the bedroom, Hamlet promptly doing of what are contrary to the Ghost injunction. Even the ideal of matricide once cross his mind.
However, Hamlet incapable of doing it and proceed to what according to Ghost told him to (Javed 332). This is an identity crisis for Hamlet, as he does not know whether he is acting upon his free will or upon the Ghost words. Killing Claudius is what the Ghost wanted. However, Hamlet is confused whether he want to Claudius or not, hence the delay in his actions. ”Hamlet is too delicate or too subtle for the purpose. A less self-questioning hero would have been a better instrument” (Javed
However, that is the fact that he has to face since his meeting with the Ghost. Since the beginning of the story, Hamlet has suspicious about Claudius being the killer; however, after meeting with the Ghost, all of the Hamlet’s actions are based on the “fact” that Claudius murder the king by pouring poison through his ears. This including The Mousetrap. Meeting with the Ghost makes Hamlet discard all of his previous postulations and putting his mind on the direction that the Ghost pointed to. The Ghost also forbids Hamlet from any murderous intentions toward Gertrude, he also order Hamlet to stop Gertrude’s relationship with Claudius.
Later, in the bedroom, Hamlet promptly doing of what are contrary to the Ghost injunction. Even the ideal of matricide once cross his mind.
However, Hamlet incapable of doing it and proceed to what according to Ghost told him to (Javed 332). This is an identity crisis for Hamlet, as he does not know whether he is acting upon his free will or upon the Ghost words. Killing Claudius is what the Ghost wanted. However, Hamlet is confused whether he want to Claudius or not, hence the delay in his actions. ”Hamlet is too delicate or too subtle for the purpose. A less self-questioning hero would have been a better instrument” (Javed