Preview

Essay On Deafness And Genetic Testing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
888 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On Deafness And Genetic Testing
Genetic engineering, or eugenics, is another proposed method of correcting Deafness which arouses much anger and controversy in the Deaf community. Deafness has a variety of root causes, and its genetics are complicated, but is known that for some people, it is caused by the gene connexin 26, as well as many other recessive, harder-to-trace genes (Leigh 49). Diagnostic testing of a Deaf or Hard of Hearing baby is becoming routine, but it is prenatal testing that inflames both the Deaf and Hearing communities. Genetic testing can determine whether a baby may be disabled, Deaf, or otherwise different, and can give parents the chance to make an informed decision about next steps. There are many examples of hearing people who wish only to have a hearing children, and Deaf people wishing to have …show more content…
Some fears include the potential for human destruction, the inability to reverse the alterations, the uncertainty of what problems will arise as a result (Effects Of…).
The desire to genetically alter the human genome to eradicate Deafness yet again shows a deep-seated need to correct what is different. What is seen as an amazing way to prevent disease by the medical community is seen as cultural genocide by the Deaf community. The willingness of humanity to interfere with nature and biodiversity is frightening, because of the message it sends about the way our society views diversity as well as the fact that its long-term effects are irreversible and still largely unknown. Some people have had personal success where genetic engineering has helped them prevent devastating health problems, but it is important to understand that no person can make that decision for someone else, as is often done when destroying the “defective” embryo, without consent from the parents. Not every difference requires a “fix,” and that sometimes difficulties that arise are the fault of society, not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In “Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks,” the author Richard Hayes is responding to Ronald M. Green’s article on gene therapy. Hayes is a visiting scholar at the University of California at Berkeley and has a Ph.D. in Energy and Resources. He has also addressed the United Nations about banning human cloning worldwide. The author argues against using genetic therapy in human research because of the risk it provides for human rights. He believes that it will likely result in the escalation of social inequality. Hayes is wrong, but also right at the same time. He is right about how gene manipulation has the potential to cause some real harm, but is wrong about how people should never use genetic technologies.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Does it stop here or next do we start genetically modifying embryos so they are taller or smarter or faster. If genetic modifying is used too freely, many problems can arise. In some countries, couples may start to use it to select a certain gender, leading to an extremely uneven gender balance. The ethical side of this is that society strides for a “perfect society” and “perfect babies” and by genetically modifying babies it shows society’s intolerant attitude for the disabled. The disabled greatly resent the fact that people would genetically modify their child to fit society’s view. Society may feel that a deaf person may not led as fulfilling of a life as a hearing person. The disabled community is completely against this view. As it is, deaf students are a lot less likely than blind students to attempt to overcome their respective disability. The deaf students embrace their disability and immerse themselves into their surrounding and supportive community. Someone who is not a part of the deaf community cannot understand the deaf culture. This clinic believes that a hearing person is incapable of seeing this from a deaf persons perspective, while a deaf person is unable to see this from a hearing persons…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cochlear Implant Culture

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    For example, when the cochlear implant first appeared on the market, it was met with indifference from the Deaf community members rather than the enthusiasm that medical professions expected. This was because they did not feel they were lacking and did not see the need of a prosthesis to effectively communicate (Blume 61). However, as the cochlear implant became more prominent, was approved for children, and was increasing implanted in deaf children born to hearing parents, there was greater dissent. For example, when one hearing mother approached the Deaf community considering implanting her child, “certain members of the deaf community…their feelings were so angry and so hurtful…[the parents] were called child abusers…and butchers” (Christiansen and Leigh 365). Through the perspective of the cultural view, this reaction is understandable. Deaf individuals feel a great sense belonging and pride in their culture like other cultural minority groups. To them, getting the implant would be denying the unknowing child the opportunity to be part of the Deaf culture. Additionally, their anger and opposition to a device with a goal to rid of deafness is not surprising. Many of them saw the cochlear implant as a step towards the “death of deafness” and the abolishment of their community and way of life (Christiansen and Leigh 368). Therefore, many of those holding the cultural view showed…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With the development of genetic modification scientists have created a chicken that has a dinosaur leg in a reverse evolution experiment, a goat that produces spider silk, featherless chicken, glow in the dark cats, sheep and monkeys and recently in February 2016 British scientists were granted permission to genetically modify human embryos. Just as Etienne Geoffroy St. Hilaire and his son Isidore Geoffroy St. Hilaire created malformations in chicken embryos, scientists in the 21st century are creating malformations in animals in the name of science – for “the good” of human beings. Wherever a person situates themselves in time, whether it is in the 18th century or 21st century, people need to understand that there will always be consequences for what we choose to do with the knowledge we gain. Knowledge can create and knowledge can destroy- both in the physical realm and in the moral realm. Morally speaking, knowledge can change how individuals (and collectively human beings) view themselves in the world and how individuals view other animals and material things in the…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Human genetic engineering is the process by which the human genome is being modified and manipulated in order to remove or select certain genes. Moreover, traits that are desirable can be selected, and preventing the genetic causes of diseases is possible. Human genetic engineering, as a new field, has raised a lot of questions and ethical issues. I argue about where we should put the limits for our genetic editing. Should we just use it to prevent harmful diseases or can we carry on with the modification and choosing the desirable traits of our future generations? Who decides? Who has the right to object? I will try my best to provide reasonable answers to those questions throughout my series of blogs, based on scientific articles that talk about its controversial and ethical aspects.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cochlear Implants

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thirty-four years ago in October 1982, a Melbourne man, Graham Carrick, made history when a remarkable invention was implanted in his cochlea. It was “switched on” and fifteen minutes later he could hear for the first time in seventeen years. From that point on, nearly 200,000 people worldwide and of all ages have benefited from life-changing cochlear implant technology (Humadro 46). Carrick has received backlash by the Deaf—people who embraces cultural norms, beliefs, and values of the Deaf Community—because of his decision to treat his case of deafness as a medical condition that needs to be modified. Parents of infant cochlear recipients are scrutinized for their adjudication. Children with profound hearing loss should be allowed to receive…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cochlear Implantation

    • 2354 Words
    • 10 Pages

    One the one hand, cochlear implants appear to be a threat to Deaf culture and potentially undermines the lives of Deaf persons, as the procedure is conducted with the intent to spare children from the despair of being deaf. This is an issue because Deaf persons cherish their deafness and actually prefer to be deaf. Moreover, labeling deafness as a disability, a word sometimes associated with a potent stigma, promotes the idea that those experiencing deafness do not have meaningful lives. On the other hand, society is engineered for the hearing population, as the majority of persons have an intact hearing mechanism. To be deaf in this society results in costly accommodations and numerous disadvantages. In addition, some argue that it is not appropriate for the Deaf community to expect hearing parents of deaf children to refrain from getting cochlear implants solely for the purpose of preserving Deaf culture. Ultimately, it is solely the decision of parents to decide if their deaf child should undergo cochlear implantation, and I feel that they are not obligated to ensure that Deaf culture lives…

    • 2354 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetic engineering often gets a bad rap with changing the natural evolutionary cycle, but it could, with proper guidance, improve almost every aspect of daily life. Advances in the Biotech Revolution have made many things that we had merely considered to be science fiction or a thing of dreams are now possible.The fact of the matter is that genetic engineering is applicable to everyday life while still being ethical and inline with people’s morals.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I feel that genome editing takes away the mystery of life and how everyone is unique because of their genomes and how they were naturally born. Many people believe that disabilities hinder that person’s life and that they are never happy with their life as a result of their disability. However, “[o]ne study3 found that half of people with serious disabilities ranked their quality of life as ‘good’ or ‘excellent’. ”(Hayden 4). This shows how they are happy with their lifestyles and that they wouldn’t want to change a single thing. Also, when mothers are pregnant, they are able to see if their child has a disability or any type of disease. However, some people decide not to know if their child has a disability or not because they don’t care about that and will love their child no matter what. For example, “Ethan Weiss doesn’t see a child with a disability. He sees his daughter making the most of her life, given all her strengths and challenges. And he knows that wouldn’t change a thing.” (Hayden 4). It shows how some people don’t care if anyone has disabilities and that everyone is special in their own way. Thus, from a social viewpoint, genome editing may not be the best option for the future generation, but it may help cure diseases that harm people’s…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The argument between whether genetic engineering is wrong or right rages on every day, and will continue to be an issue until everybody can come to an agreement on what can and can’t be done. Mary Shelley, the author of Frankenstein, writes about how she feels and questions the progression of modern science and how far we can go until it is just morally and ethically wrong. Through the mind of a young scientist, Mary pictures the possibility of what could happen if we venture too far into the unknown and how could it harm everyone. Knowing the line between continuing and finding things that can help society and knowing when to stop is essential to stop something from happening just like in the novel Frankenstein. Not only that, but many people argue over the fact that modifying the human body is wrong and go against the will of many different…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethics of Designer Babies

    • 1925 Words
    • 8 Pages

    • Peterson, James C. Genetic Turning Points: the Ethics of Human Genetic Intervention. Grand Rapids, MI: W.B. Eerdmans Pub., 2001. Princeton…

    • 1925 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Deaf Problems

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The root of many problems is that society tends to try to only fix issues that personally affect the individual. Since America is an individualistic culture, we tend to help solve problems that are motivated by personal achievement, past situations and immediate results. A lot of times we forgetting the bigger picture and looking at a grand scheme issue I would like to solve the lack of education for language available to deaf citizens of third world countries.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Is Genetic Altering?

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages

    They should also be worried and cautious of the people who would rather have handicapped children. Sharon Duchesneau and her partner are both extremely deaf. They have always been deaf and they have faced the hardships and obstacles that come with the condition. Instead of wanting to keep their child from having to experience those hard times, they consciously attempted to create a major sensory defect in their child. “Scientists and philosophers have been debating the morality of new reproductive technologies that may allow us to design “perfect” human beings.” says Wendy McElroy. Wendy pointed out that “The moral outrage the Duchesneau case elicits easily can lead to bad law- laws that may hinder responsible parents from using genetic techniques to remedy conditions such as cystic fibrosis in embryos.” (McElroy) The Duchesneau case has made all forms of genetic engineering be brought into question. Genetic engineering and altering is a major step forward in science that can save many lives and create lives that otherwise wouldn’t be possible. However, science should not be able to run free and be used without rules. The government should get involved and become a mediator to differentiate between the inconvenient disabilities and the fatal…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Starting with a Deaf baby been born to Deaf parents, most Deaf parents have this incredible…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Weston argues that “it’s our responsibility to seek out the facts-honestly and persistently” (pg. 233). The topic of genetic engineering has made for a discomforting discussion between many conservatives and liberals. My own view is that genetic engineering should be banned because I feel it’s extremely unethical to use biomedical technologies to eradicate those with unfavorable disabilities, and predetermine one’s destiny. At this point in time, its safety and reliability are extremely questionable. It has the possibility to trigger unintended immune responses that may cause some genes to no longer be functional or to mutate into gene patterns that could potentially be harmful. Some might argue that the promotion of genetic engineering…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays