Essay On Common Sense Dbq
Seventeen sixty-three was a year of great celebration, it was the year of the French and Indian War's end. The British defeated the French and their Native American allies, in North America. The colonists were pleased with the British victory, because they could now live in peace. However, as time past and the cost of the war were being charged to the colonies, the 13 began to feel enmity towards England. The Americans became unified and severed their bonds with Great Britain. This separation was inevitable, as philosopher Thomas Paine said in his most famous essay; it was only "Common Sense" for the 13 colonies of America to declare their independence from the Empire of Great Britain.
Thomas Paine's "Common Sense" published in January …show more content…
The colonies in America though, were being taxed to gain revenue. In the book Letters From a Farmer in Pennsylvania, John Dickinson an American colonist, who was an active member of both the Stamp Act and Continental Congresses wrote about these profit gaining taxes, The Townshend Acts. He wrote "[The Townshend Acts claim the authority] to impose duties on these colonies, not for the regulation of trade but for the single purpose of levying money on us." (Document 2) The only point of the Townshend Acts was to make a profit for Britain off her American colonies. This money wasn't going back across the Atlantic to help the colonists become more self-sufficient, instead it was probably going directly into the pockets of parliament and King George III. Why shouldn't the colonies revolt if they were being taxed unreasonably, only to make the rich more wealthy?
North America's eastern seaboard was part of the British domain in 1770, therefore the job of protecting the colonies was that of England's red coated soldiers. Funny then, that on March 5, 1770 these soldiers opened fire on the colonists, the people they were being paid to protect. This was the Boston Massacre (Document 3). Should a colony stay aligned with a mercantilist mother nation if the soldiers who were sworn to protect it open fire on the local
Thomas Paine's "Common Sense" published in January …show more content…
The colonies in America though, were being taxed to gain revenue. In the book Letters From a Farmer in Pennsylvania, John Dickinson an American colonist, who was an active member of both the Stamp Act and Continental Congresses wrote about these profit gaining taxes, The Townshend Acts. He wrote "[The Townshend Acts claim the authority] to impose duties on these colonies, not for the regulation of trade but for the single purpose of levying money on us." (Document 2) The only point of the Townshend Acts was to make a profit for Britain off her American colonies. This money wasn't going back across the Atlantic to help the colonists become more self-sufficient, instead it was probably going directly into the pockets of parliament and King George III. Why shouldn't the colonies revolt if they were being taxed unreasonably, only to make the rich more wealthy?
North America's eastern seaboard was part of the British domain in 1770, therefore the job of protecting the colonies was that of England's red coated soldiers. Funny then, that on March 5, 1770 these soldiers opened fire on the colonists, the people they were being paid to protect. This was the Boston Massacre (Document 3). Should a colony stay aligned with a mercantilist mother nation if the soldiers who were sworn to protect it open fire on the local