Preview

Erving Goffman Focuses on Form of Social Interaction

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2737 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Erving Goffman Focuses on Form of Social Interaction
Examine the view that Erving Goffman’s work focuses on forms of social interaction but ignores social structure.
Erving Goffman was born on the 11th June 1922 in Mannville, Canada. In 1939, Goffman enrolled at the University of Manitoba where he pursued an undergraduate degree in chemistry; however he then took an interest for sociology while working temporarily at the National Film Board in Ottawa. This was the motivation that he then needed to go on and enrol at the University of Toronto where he studied anthropology and sociology, then after graduating with a degree he began a masters in sociology at the University of Chicago, which was one of the centres’ of sociological research in the United States. In the decade from 1959-1969 Goffman published seven significant books, this was a remarkable achievement, and so has been considered as the most influential sociologist of the twentieth century. The focus of his work was the organisation of observable, everyday behaviour, usually but not always among unacquainted in urban settings. He used a variety of qualitative methods; he then developed classifications of the different elements of social interaction. The assumption of this approach was that these classifications were heuristic, simplifying tools for sociological analysis that did not capture the complexity of lived experience. Goffman was heavily influenced by George Mead and Herbert Blumer in his theoretical framework, and went on to pioneer the study of face-to-face interaction, elaborate the “dramaturgical approach” to human interaction, and develop numerous concepts that would have massive influence.
Goffman mainly concentrated on the detailed analysis of encounters and the norms governing these encounters, therefore the evaluation of face-to-face interactions, paying close attention to the small details of these interactions and discovering things that may seem insignificant yet actually are what structure behaviour and behaviour norms. In doing so,



Bibliography: * Durkheim E. 1912. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. * Goffman E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. * Goffman E. 1961. Asylums Harmondsworth: Penguin. * Goffman E. 1963. Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings * Goffman E.1971 * Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior. Chicago: Aldine. * Giddens A. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Berkeley: University Of Californa Press. * Giddens A. 2009. Sociology 6th Addition. * Rawls Warfield A. 1987. The Interaction Order Sui Generis: Goffman’s Contribution to Social Theory. Sociological Theory, Volume 5, Issue (Autumn,1987).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Compare and contrast the views of Goffman and Foucault on how social order is produced.…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In my ethnographic study, I apply theoretical concepts developed by Erving Goffman in The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life to the behavior of employees in the retail department store, Macy’s. Goffman (1959) argues that social interactions in everyday life can be understood as presentations between performers and audiences. Within social establishments, he suggests four analytical frameworks may govern how performers stage their “characters” including the technical, political, structural and cultural; he also argues that the aforementioned perspectives are situation-specific and thus can also be analyzed within a broader dramaturgical framework (Goffman 1959). The task of this…

    • 1682 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the event that individuals and gatherings are disregarded, that is as a rule a figured endeavor to make light of on gatherings statuses in social, monetary and political life. As down to earth encounters made us mindful, in social orders where contrasts between gatherings are sharp, the negligible refusal to recognize the presence of different groups appears to be inadequate. To this, the predominant gathering endeavors to dehumanize the fighting group. Furthermore, if this does not accomplish the craved results, the predominant group results to physical intends to battle the adversary bunch. Yet, in the event that somebody overlooks you, snickers at you, attempts to battle you, and you win implies that you embraced diverse methodologies…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Erving Goffman’s ideas focus on the ‘micro’, and the patterns of everyday life. He analyzed the social rules governing the interactions of individuals to develop his theories. Goffman demonstrated that the most casual actions of an individual, such as a glance or bodily gesture, are in effect a performance aimed toward communicating a positive impression for an audience. ‘Often these ways of acting and interacting are unnoticed and only become apparent when they are breached’ (staples et al.,2009, p.?) Goffman focused on the self and self-presentation. He preferred to study individuals, and the minutiae of a person’s face-to-face…

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Goffman studied social life based on the idea that people interact in many different ways, sometimes…

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Erving Goffman, a prominent Canadian-American sociologist, is considered one of the most influential sociologists of the twentieth century. He has coined and created numerous terms and concepts that have had a great influence on the discipline of sociology and what it has become today. He focus was on the actual social environment and physical interaction of individuals that shapes their views of self. Many of his concepts were created out of his own research and observations that he would make well working in the sociology field.…

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    My first question I like to examine is who gets to decide what order is?. According to Erving Goffman (1959) order in society is made and remade through the interactional order and performances, such as people performing roles in specific contexts to convey a designated air of ‘servility’. This would accommodate bodily ‘deportment’ and ‘gazes’. Goffman says this discourse of interaction forms ‘a set of rules of conduct’ (Silva B. Elizabeth, 2009, p. 317) that determine the dominant ways of thinking what the imagined social order. Goffman withstands that social order is presented through everyday practices and actions people play as they live their lives.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    To start with an overview of Goffman’s theory. Goffman studied what he termed interactional order, that is how the functions of ritual and order of every individual member of society, in everyday life, interact to form social order. He suggested the metaphor of the stage, where people play roles in specific everyday situations using trust and tact, the control of bodily gestures, face and gaze and the use of language to set the parameters of their social interactions. People individually participate in these rules of conduct to produce social order. Goffman argues that it is these interactions, or the interactional order that constructs society. (Silva, 2009) Where do these ‘rules of conduct’ come from? How are people able to share them in common with each other?…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In terms of sociological theory in the 1960's, the interactionist view of deviance enjoyed wide popularity. For many sociologists, the work of writers such as Becker, Lemert and Goffman become the accepted, orthodox perspective on deviance. Nevertheless, In the 1970's it began to provoke strong criticism. Interactionist rallied to the defense of their work and attempted to show that the criticism were unjustified.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    W. E. B. DuBois

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cited: Allan, Kenneth. Explorations in Classical Sociological Theory: Seeing the Social World. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge, 2005. Print.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sociology: Goffman

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Dramatism is the framework associated with Goffman and Goffman began writing in the 1950 his first book “the presentation of self in everyday life” presented in 1959 and after that he was a kind of maverick out on his own, producing a string of books containing what many at the time described as convincing journalistic accounts of how everyday live is managed by the individual. the views of Goffman weren’t simple but difficult there was the traditional view that this developed out of symbolical interactism developed from mead which is very important there are major differences also he was influences by an American journalism critic Kenif burke writing in the 1930 0r 40s after that he areas that he moved closer to fanomiolgy and * structuralism in that kind of view I emphasised last year was George Simmal what u can argue Goffman is doing is looking at common forms of behaviour in different context. More recently the main commentators including the handout I gave you by Collins, pointed to a strong connection to Durkheim arguing what Goffman is concerned with or social facts if u like the rules that produce social interaction and social order not individuals but Goffman differs from Durkheim in that he sees such order as fragile as constantly having to be built and rebuilt in everyday situations. Here the argument is that Goffman’s force is on the rituals that create and maintain order in everyday life.…

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Goffman believed that by nature, we tend to seek information from others at the first meet-up. With this information that we receive, we establish expectations of how we should behave as well as to how the people around us should behave. Much of this information are based on snap judgments and derived from the information we get from the people in our surroundings.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The World has produced a great deal of thinkers. Socialologists have a keen understanding and insight into human nature and the world around them. They have developed many theories on the human thoughts and actions. Herbert Blumer was a profound sociologist who had a deep impact on social theory. He was an interactionist who coined the term “symbolic interactionism” and formulated the most prominent version of the theory. An interactionsist focuses on the aspects so social life instead of the social system. They view humans as active creatures who fully participate in creating their own social world instead of conforming to socialization. In society today, people live in a world in which television is an active part of their lives. It has a vast variety of selections people can watch on tv. From comedies to world news, televison has the ability to influence every generation in different ways. If Herbert Blumer were to watch the show Two and a Half Men, he would have a great insight to the series.…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Anderson, M. & Taylor, H. (2011). 'Sociology: The Essentials: 6th Edition. ' Belmont: Thompson Wadsworth. Print…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Man is a complex, social animal. Every person on this earth is a unique individual— an array of fronts, faces, and beliefs that make up the ‘self’. There are many theories on the workings of the ‘self’—or, spiritually speaking, the soul. An influential example of such would be Erving Goffman’s theory of self-presentation—a deeply faceted analysis of the human psyche. Goffman’s book, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, while written in 1959, contains sociological ideas that can still be applied to modern men and women of today. Goffman argues that we, as people, play the ‘parts’ of our selves, just as actors would play parts in a play. He also believes the self is a construct of strategy and potential artifice—a theory that can be tested…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays