Preview

Epicurus's View Of Pleasure

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
141 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Epicurus's View Of Pleasure
Epicurus is considered a major figure in the history of science as well as philosophy. He argued that we should only proportion belief to empirical evidence and logic, and he propounded the scientific view of atomism, according to which all facts in the macroscopic world are caused by the configuration of atoms or indivisible elements in the microscopic world. In ethics he is famous for propounding the theory of hedonism, which holds that pleasure is the only intrinsic value. As we shall see, however, his view of pleasure is far from the stereotypical one. For Epicurus, the most pleasant life is one where we abstain from unnecessary desires and achieve an inner tranquility (ataraxia) by being content with simple things, and by choosing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Which Hellenistic philosophy taught that we should strive for “pleasure,” defined as the absence of pain? –Epicureanism…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A Stoic is a person who is seemingly indifferent to or unaffected by joy, grief, pleasure, or pain. One who is not touched by the outside world seem to live inside themselves always thinking that today might be the last. Stoics detach themselves from things of this worlds including objects, people, and to a certain extent their own lives. In Marcus Aurelius’ Meditations and Epictetus’ Discourses they both explain how to properly be a stoic, learning to deny their feelings, respect themselves and nature, and detach themselves from the useless things of this world.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    “The prospect of death is at best a disquieting annoyance; it is at worst a terrifying mystery” (Rosenbaum 175). Death, a tragedy of life, is an experience that each and every one of us have to undergo through at a certain point in our lifetime. May it be from old age, sickness, violence etc. death is a state of affairs that is inescapable. Stephen Rosenbaum, a Professor of Philosophy at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, writes the essay “How to Be Dead and Not care” where he introduces Epicurus’ argument, defends and explicates it while also incorporating an American philosopher Thomas Nagel, objections to the argument. Evidently Rosenbaum’s essay serves as an insight for readers to learn how to value and repurpose their lives to be better than they are. Personally I do believe that death is not always bad for one in that, if a person were sick and day-in-day-out they were in pain, which hindered their daily interactions and experiences, then their death is not bad. At this point the person is at peace hence no pain, no sufferings, and no worries. Looking at the antithesis of my belief, if a happy person dies of a car accident then at this point death is bad for them since it deprives the person of their continued happiness and…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eulogy on Epicurus: “You are my father and the discoverer of truth… I feed on each golden saying. Plainly visible are the gods in their majesty and their calm realms… All the needs of the gods are sullied by nature, and nothing at any time detracts from their peace of mind.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One interesting thing about Epicurus’ is that he believed that the true life of pleasure consists…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Find out where the joy resides, and give it a voice far beyond singing; For to miss the joy is to miss all. In The Consolation of Philosophy, by author Alain de Botton we are introduced to a philosopher named Epicurus. He was born in 341 BC and started learning philosophy at the age of 14 by traveling to hear lessons from philosophers of his time. Later on, he found out that he couldn’t agree with much of what they were saying, so in his late twenties he decided to arrange his thought into his own philosophy about life. Epicurus spent most of his life of chasing happiness and was lead to a conclusion that it’s a rather tricky issue. He…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Epicurus Epicurus (342.-270 B.C), unlike Aristippus had a more intellectual view of pleasure, and he was mainly concerned with the pleasures of the mind. Epicurus felt that man's insecurity could be partly traced to his false opinions regarding God: "First of all, believe that God is a being incorruptible and happy, as the common opinion of the world about God dictates; and attach to your idea of him nothing which is inconsistent with incorruptibility or with happiness; and think that he is invested with everything which is able to preserve to him this happiness, in conjunction with incorruptibility .For there are Gods; though our knowledge of them is indistinct .But they are not of the character which people in general attribute…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Psychological Egoism

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Let’s consider the chapters on Hedonism and the connection between our pursuit of happiness and the consequential behavior that is then elicited; as well as the natural law theory which persuades followers to behave naturally. In both cases these behaviors were motivated by our understanding of what’s moral and what’s immoral. It’s essential to make the distinction between the theories themselves and the resulting behavior that’s performed.. The discussion of our ethical considerations, however, goes “hand in hand” with our behaviors because without one, it’s impractical to consider the other. These ideas are…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “The Experience Machine,” Robert Nozrick (1974) presents a fascinating argument against hedonism. According to the hedonist, the only intrinsic good thing is pleasure, and the only intrinsic bad thing is pain. Thus, if one does something that doesn’t give them pleasure, or enable them to avoid pain, then the hedonist would argue that it doesn’t seem as though that thing is good for you. Norzick disagrees vehemently with this view. He argues that the good life isn’t solely dependent on the quality of our inner experiences (p. 27). In this paper, I reconstruct and defend Norzick’s argument.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Epicureans Vs Greek Essay

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Both the Epicureans and the Stoics live by ataraxia, however Epicureans believed the highest human good contradicted from that of the stoics. Epicurus thought it was normal to seek pleasure and avoid pain in order to live in Eudemonia. While Stoicism’s thought happiness depended on how one was feeling towards life in that particular moment or place. One couldn’t suddenly get happier by having more time in their hands to be content. In Stoicism, self-preservation is a natural instinct, while pleasure plays this role for the Epicureans. Owing to both of these philosophies having such…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paper on Epicurus

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Epicurus is famous for being a ancient Greek Philosopher that created the school of philosophy called Epicureanism. His thoughts of pleasure and pain go much deeper than crying or smiling. He went beyond what others were doing, by standing back and watching the bigger picture of what’s morally right and wrong. Epicurus had a goal for human life and it is being happy, but happiness comes from absence of physical pain and mental disturbance. What that says is that we put ourselves through so much mental and physical pain to receive very little happiness. Epicurus as a Philosopher was ahead of his time and really put everyone’s ideas, thoughts, fears, and pleasures in words and explained how they worked in our bodies.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    EPICURUS TO MENOECEUS

    • 914 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Epicurus in his letter to Menoeceus backers the necessity of freedom from prejudice, superstition and extremes of emotions in the pursuit of happiness and a tranquil life. The apparent simplicity of this formula allowed detractors to misinterpret Epicurus, depicting him as depraved, hedonistic, anarchistic and atheistic. His aim is to present to us, how to live a happy life. He sees happiness as the fundamental principle of the good life. This paper is an attempt to critically delineate the essential tenets of Epicureanism as articulated in his letter to Menoeceus, and finally to criticize and evaluate in order to arrive at a dependable conclusion. In what follows, it would be apt to briefly consider the personality or Epicurus, before delving into the main work.…

    • 914 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Among the primary and secondary sources on Greek and Roman, early Christianity, and Rabbinic texts, an underlying commonality that is portrayed within these texts is that there is a line between one that holds a more authoritative position versus a follower. Whether it may be Torah student’s following and learning from Rabbis or a young boy having a relationship with an older man during the ancient Greek and Roman period, there is a constant division between individuals who are respected and have higher powers and those who are passive and following. A theme that ties in with the roles of different hierarchical positions in society is the concept of what it means to be a “man” during not only the ancient Greek and Roman period but as well the early Christians and Rabbinic texts. In Foucault’s book, The Use of Pleasure (p. 81), the excerpt of moderation in the context of what “qualifies” being a man ties in with the course's theme of gender asymmetry and how practicing ‘moderation’ geared to achieving manhood and manliness.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    ‘Aristotelianism is defined as happiness as the quality of a whole life time.’ “Happiness is the purpose for which we live. Aristotle concluded that happiness is not a moment to moment experience of pleasurable things but rather a way of characterizing how one’s life is being conducted. Happiness is living and having lived a good life”. (Janaro & Altshuler, 2009)…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Fox)” This is why I choose to use Epicurus over Aristippus. Although, his teachings were fundamentally flawed, and not realistic for everyone they don’t leave much in the way of misinterpretation towards overindulgence. Fast forward to modern society, ran and marketed by the top psychologists. They have marketed hedonism as a swingers resort in Jamaica, or commercializing self-expression celebrations such as the Burning Man Festival, which has led to attracting people who are seeking pseudo hedonism and overindulgence. Psychologists know that a majority publicity is profitable. At its core hedonism has fundamentally sound in its virtues. It’s fundamentally important for good natured humans to seek out pleasurable experiences through expression. Is a good person who engages in something that they find pleasurable, yet society as whole may finds it undesirable; does this make the person…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays