Preview

Ephors's Participation In The Athenian Political System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
512 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ephors's Participation In The Athenian Political System
The people of Athens obtain the right to participate in public life through political reforms over the years; as at first only the wealthy few participated in public life. During the archaic period (around 800-500 BCE) power was only in the hands of the established wealthy landowning aristocratic class. Henceforth, the majority of the population were marginalized by the wealthy landowning class. This marginalization created resentment among the non wealthy class; and the resentment lead to social unrest that ultimately lead to Athens democracy system where all qualified citizens (and not just the wealthy) can vote. The developing democracy system was still rigged by the aristocrats “so that the majority (poorer classes) could not outvote the …show more content…
The power of these two kings however was kept in check by the Ephors who were elected annually and the Gerousia (an elite elder council). For a Spartan to be a Ephor; they must be one of the dual kings (by which both of the two kings are also Ephors) and/or be elected as one of the (ultimately) 5 members elected each year to be one. Ephors could serve only a single, one-year term in office. Becoming an Ephor was the only route to political power for non aristocratic Spartan citizens. For a Spartan to be part of the Gerousia; they must be 60 years of age and must be an aristocrat. Their membership was for life and they numbered at 30 members at a time. No law or issue could come before the popular assembly without the approval of the Gerousia and the Ephors usually deferred to their guidance as well. Sparta also had an assembly by which all free male citizens were part. This assembly had the power to elect the annual Ephors and new members of the Gerousia when slots became available. However, the assembly’s power was strictly limited by the formal or informal power of the Ephors and the Gerousia. This popular assembly is actually similar to the Athenian direct democracy; however, the power of Spartan assembly was very limited when compared to that of ancient democratic Athens. Sparta and Athens differ by that Sparta was more of an Oligarchy and Athens more of a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    During the ages of 800 and 401 BCE, Athens and Sparta were very different in many ways, but in a couple of ways, they were somewhat similar. They both had wealthy aristocrats who controlled their government and who made decisions on what was “best” for their poleis and its people, and both used a political legislative system. While the Spartans had the elder council, called “Gerousia”, the Ephors and the general assembly, the Athenians had the legislative branch, called “Boule”, and the popular assembly. Whereas the Spartan’s general assembly could make laws and the Gerousia and the Ephors could veto them, the Athenians “Boule” could suggest laws, but the popular assembly was responsible for passing legislation into law or vetoing it. Both the Spartan’s general assembly and the Athenian’s popular assembly were made up of free male citizens in their respective city states.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This written assignment will address these questions about Athens and Sparta: How did people in Athens and Sparta obtain the right to participate in public life and make decisions affecting the community? Who held public office? What rules governed the selection of public office holders? How…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gerousia Dbq

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To be considered a “citizen” in Sparta, you had to be: male, could not be a Helot, or Perioikoi, or a slave. There was an assembly of all male citizens, an elder council of men over 60, the Gerousia, and the Ephors that consisted of 5 magistrates. The Gerousia, was an elite elder council of 30 men and was the Spartan equivalent of the senate. The Gerousia was made up of the wealthier and more conservative men. When one of the 30 seats became available in the Gerousia, it was the assembly who chose the man to fill the Gerousia vacancy. The Ephors were elected each year for one, one-year term by the members of the assembly. The assembly consisted of all male Spartan citizens. Becoming an Ephor was the only way to for non-aristocratic citizens to gain political power. The assembly passed laws and was responsible for making decisions concerning war, but it was the Ephors and the Gerousia that selected which matters would be decided by the assembly and the Ephors and the Gerousia could veto the decisions made by the Assembly so the Ephors and the Gerousia generally monopolized the city-states decisions.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ephors Research Paper

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages

    They were elected by the assembly annually, or each year. Unlike the gerousia and kingship, the ephors were not required to be from ‘noble families’ and any FULL Spartiate citizen over the age of 30 was eligible to run for a position in the ephorate. Aristotle wasn’t favourably…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Several Greek city-states had the government form of an oligarchy, where the small group of people wield the ruling power. They were considered the highest class as political power was shared amongst the group (Carr). The groups were formed based off of aristocratic birth or wealth (Carr). Unlike this class, the lower class citizens in the oligarchy did not share the same rights as they lacked full political rights and were not eligible to rule (Carr). They are thus excluded from voting or having any type of say for any political decision for the city-state Furthermore, the right to vote or to be eligible for power was based off of wealth in this government form. In contrast to this government for his city-state lived under, Aristotle explores…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Documents E and F highlight the main differences in the administration systems. The Athenian Assembly met forty times a year and during these meetings, any of the forty thousand Athenian citizens were eligible to attend. This can easily lead to arguments between the huge crowds breaking out. The large number of attendees could also make it very difficult to properly count votes. The Council of Five Hundred was a group of officials that oversaw the Assembly. While this may sound like a great way to keep order, the officials were chosen by lottery from the general citizenry. This could lead to an unfair representation of the general public in the…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the age of Pericles, the Athenians became deeply attached to their democratic system. The sovereignty of the people was embodied in the assembly (ecclesia), which consisted of all male citizens over eighteen years of age. In the 440s, that was probably a group about 43,000. Meetings of the assembly were held on the hillside of the Pnyx, east of the Acropolis. The assembly passed all laws and made final decisions on war and foreign policy. Usually, only respected leaders could speak and that required considerable speaking ability.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The kind of government that Ancient Greece had was democracy, wherein everyone is given a chance to be heard and “the administration is in the hands of the many and not the few” (Reilly 91). This gave its citizens to have a say on the events and decisions that occur in the city. It is also a form of government where “aristocrats [were] stripped of all their powers except for certain judicial functions” (Bowra 93). Anyone was capable of being part of the government regardless of their job or their state and each part of Ancient Greece had their representatives to ensure that each part able to contribute and lead. This had a significant part to its rise to power because this form of government was able to develop a trust among its people and it was used as a means of being able to communicate effectively among the people of Ancient Greece.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is thought that the age limit for any position of government was around 30 years old. Although this democracy was advanced, it was disappointing, as women, slaves, and resident foreigners were excluded from participating. “Athens' constitution is called a democracy because it respects the interests not of a minority but of the whole people. When it is a question of settling private disputes, everyone is equal before the law; when it is a question of putting one person before another in positions of public responsibility, what counts is not membership of a particular class, but the actual ability which the man possesses. No one, so long as he has it in him to be of service to the state, is kept in political obscurity because of poverty.” (Thuc.…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Sparta Change

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As humanity has progressed throughout history, there have been a number of times in which the interest and involvement of politics has changed. As we look back we can see that as the eras changed, interests of the people changed as well. One example of this is during the time of the Ancient Greeks. At this point in Western Civilization one polis by the name of Athens located on the coast of the Aegean Sea felt that political participation was a key factor in everyday life. Unfortunately not all Greek city-states were on the same page as the Athenians. While Athens took pride in their democratic elections, their assembly and their Council, other city-states such as Sparta took a much more different approach. Sparta was a society in which…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    n order to to participate in public life and make decisions affecting the community in Sparta it meant that you had to be a warrior. Sparta was a Oligarchy witch means "rule of the few". In Athens in order to participate in public life and make decisions you had to be native born, male and free. In Athens your political standing depended on you wealth. The men with the highest wealth could seek the highest political offices. The next step down the ladder were men with slightly less wealth referred to as the horse men. The horse men could serve in lesser political offices and join the army. The middle class could only be elected to low level political offices. The poor and the landless could vote but not hold office or be in the army however they could row the ships. Sparta had far fewer…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Greece and Rome

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Athenian democracy was made up of three important institutions. The first was the ekklesia, the boule, and the dikasteria. The ekklesia made decisions about war and foreign policy, wrote and revised laws and approved or condemned the conduct of public officials. The boule was a group of 500 men, 50 from each of ten Athenian tribes, who served on the Council for one year. The boule met every day and basically dictated how the entire democracy would work. The dikasteria, was more than 500 jurors that were chosen by lot from a pool of male citizens older than 30.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Document D) This precisely states that Ancient Athens was a truly democratic in a sense, but still is run by the male citizens. Today's democracy in America is run by representatives of the people, in fact today’s democracy is run by all citizens over the age of eighteen. Athenian demokratia is run by male citizens, and are essentially their own representatives.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Greek Polis

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After this period, the concept of the polis began to change. The regulation of power changed, along with the rights and duties of the people. The Greeks located the source of authority in the polis. Policy was decided in open discussions. In order to be a citizen in the polis, one had to be an adult whose ancestors were Greek and from that particular polis. Children, foreigners, and slaves could not be citizens. Citizens had many exclusive rights, including: the right to vote, own property, and contract legal marriage. The city-states differed in different regions of ancient Greece. Even though the states kept the concept of the polis, the way in which each was governed differed. Two of the most important city-states were Sparta and Athens. Sparta developed as a war-like polis, while Athens developed as a democratic one.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States House of Representatives has many similarities to the Ekklesia in Athens. The Ekklesia is also referred to as the Assembly, and was “the sovereign ruling body of Athens” (History.com Staff). Participation in the Assembly was originally allotted only to males with at least two years of military experience, but Solon opened it up to all Athenian citizens. In order for the Assembly to operate, a quorum of 6,000 people was required on some occasions (Revolvy). They wrote and revised laws, disciplined public officials,…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays