Preview

English Authors and Their Books

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4933 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
English Authors and Their Books
JULIUS CEASER
Julius Caesar (play)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The ghost of Caesar taunts Brutus about his imminent defeat. (Copperplate engraving by Edward Scriven from a painting by Richard Westall: London, 1802.)
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is a tragedy by William Shakespeare, believed to have been written in 1599.[1] It portrays the 44 BC conspiracy against the Roman dictator Julius Caesar, his assassination and the defeat of the conspirators at the Battle of Philippi. It is one of several plays written by Shakespeare based on true events from Roman history, which also include Coriolanus and Antony and Cleopatra.
Although the title is Julius Caesar, Julius Caesar is not the most visible character in its action; he appears in only five scenes: the third in which the beginning of the third act shows his death; the fourth where his corpse is displayed in the common place; and his ghost appears towards the end of the fourth act. Marcus Brutus speaks more than four times as many lines, and the central psychological drama is his struggle between the conflicting demands of honor, patriotism, and friendship. Contents [hide] * 1 Characters * 2 Synopsis * 3 Date and text * 3.1 Deviations from Plutarch * 4 Analysis and criticism * 4.1 Historicism * 4.2 Protagonist debate * 5 Performance history * 6 Notable performances * 6.1 Screen performances * 7 Adaptations and cultural references * 8 See also * 9 References * 9.1 Footnotes * 9.2 Secondary sources * 10 External links |
Characters[edit]
* Julius Caesar * Calpurnia: Wife of Caesar * Octavius, Mark Antony, Lepidus: Triumvirs after the death of Julius Caesar * Cicero, Publius, Popilius Lena: Senators * Brutus, Cassius, Casca, Trebonius, Ligarius, Decius Brutus, Metellus Cimber, Cinna: Conspirators against Julius Caesar * Portia: Wife of Brutus * Flavius and Marullus: Tribunes * Artemidorus: a Sophist of



References: 1. ^ Shakespeare, William; Arthur Humphreys (Editor) (1999). Julius Caesar. Oxford University Press. p. 1. ISBN 0-19-283606-4. 2. ^ Named in Parallel Lives and quoted in Spevack, Marvin (2004). Julius Caesar. New Cambridge Shakespeare (2 ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. p. 74. ISBN 978-0-521-53513-7. 9. ^ Wells and Dobson (2001, 229). 10. ^ Spevack (1988, 6), Dorsch (1955, vii–viii), Boyce (2000, 328), Wells, Dobson (2001, 229) 11 22. ^ Evans, G. Blakemore (1974). The Riverside Shakespeare. Houghton Mifflin Co. p. 1100. 25. ^ "Theatre: New Plays in Manhattan: Nov. 22, 1937". TIME. 22 November 1937. Retrieved 13 March 2010. * Chambers, Edmund Kerchever. 1923. The Elizabethan Stage. 4 volumes, Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-811511-3. * Halliday, F. E. 1964. A Shakespeare Companion 1564–1964. Shakespeare Library ser. Baltimore, Penguin, 1969. ISBN 0-14-053011-8. * Houppert, Joseph W. “Fatal Logic in ‘Julius Caesar’ ”. South Atlantic Bulletin. Vol. 39, No.4. Nov. 1974. 3–9. * Kahn, Coppelia. "Passions of some difference": Friendship and Emulation in Julius Caesear. Julius Caesar: New Critical Essays. Horst Zander, ed. New York: Routledge, 2005. 271–283. * Reynolds, Robert C. “Ironic Epithet in Julius Caesar”. Shakespeare Quarterly. Vol. 24. No.3. 1973. 329–333. * Taylor, Myron. "Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar and the Irony of History". Shakespeare Quarterly. Vol. 24, No. 3. 1973. 301–308. * Wells, Stanley and Michael Dobson, eds. 2001. The Oxford Companion to Shakespeare Oxford University Press External links[edit] | [show] * v * t * eWilliam Shakespeare 's Julius Caesar (1599) |

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s interpretation of Julius Caesar’s assassination titled, Julius Caesar, a man named Cassius is attempting to get the help and alliance of a fellow Roman named Brutus in the conspiracy of assassinating the Roman leader. He accomplishes this in constructed and detailed monologues to persuade Brutus to join the conspiracy. In each of Cassius’ monologues, Cassius strategically uses appeals and rhetorical devices to ultimately give a successful and persuasive speech to his audience, Brutus.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar and Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun themes, symbols, and characters can be compared. Both A Raisin in the Sun and Julius Caesar were written for the stage; therefore their characters become more obvious and more thoroughly portrayed than in a book, for example. Even though, these works were written by far different authors and in different centuries their similarities and differences are evident. In both A Raisin in the Sun and Julius Caesar themes, symbols, and character development are consistent.…

    • 2289 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The story of Julius Caesar is well known and has been performed and presented in many different ways. Shakespeare’s Original playwright is sometimes difficult to comprehend, and so live action renditions have been made. There are differences however, between the written version and the watched, differences that can either help the viewer to understand, or leave them even more confused than before.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cited: Parenti, Michael. The Assassination of Julius Caesar. New York: The New Press, 2003. Print.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Shakespeare’s ’Julius Caesar,’ what characters say and think about each other, has a significant impact on the ways in which they themselves, are…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Akin to the Salem Witch Trials that took place in 1692 and 1693, the assassination of the great Julius Caesar in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar appeared to be unreasonable or unjust to many of those that honor him. However, unlike the notorious Salem Witch Trials, it is clear that as light manifests itself upon the mysterious reasons in regards to why Julius Caesar was brutally murdered, it is made obvious that Julius Caesar may not have been quite the adored and honorable man that the Romans so hoped for. There was a side to the Julius Caesar that remained hidden by his graciousness and utterly generous facade. This side of the great and almighty Caesar would prove to convince and compel the very Senators that served below him, that Caesar must meet his rather “timely” demise.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Julius Caesar, a conquering Roman general and the target of the conspirators, is seen as a tyrant and megalomaniac by some such as Cassius and Brutus who plot against Caesar and murder him in what they believe to be for “the general good.” While speaking to Brutus in private, Cassius reveals his thoughts on Caesar, “…he doth bestride the narrow world like a Colossus, and we petty men walk under his huge legs and peep about.” Alluding to the immense statue of the god Apollo, the use of simile compares Caesar to this massive structure and creates the image of a tyrant. However, followers of Caesar such as Mark Antony and the mob seen in Act 1, Scene 1, depict a conflicting perspective of Caesar. The stage directions at the beginning of Act 1, Scenes 1 and 2 highlight Caesar’s power and the loyalty of the public towards him. “A public place. Flourish. Enter Caesar…a great crowd following” and also “Re – enter Caesar and his train,” emphasise the public’s sense of admiration shown towards Caesar. The public see Caesar as…

    • 2867 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The play called Julius Caesar is about the great Roman leader and his rise to power and fall from power. In the play, a character named Antony was a deeply loyal follower of Julius Caesar and when Julius is betrayed by his companions, Antony cowardly took to their side, as to be allowed to talk at Caesar’s funeral. At the funeral, however, he gives a speech that turns the crowd against the conspirators. Antony’s strategies in the funeral speech proved effective and a good use of rhetorics.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Even in his absence or death, the manner in which characters address Caesar, describe him, and act in his presence, reveals the authority and influence he has over people's lives. From the first scene, Caesar is presented as victorious, having vanquished his rival, Pompey, and as an extremely popular figure among the people, with the commoners even defying authorities to celebrate his victory. As the play continues into scene ii, Caesar appears before the crowds as a modern-day pop-star, surrounded by a trail of subservient entourage. Casca and Antony display complete submission to Caesar, with the latter declaring that 'when Caesar says Do this! It is done' . In Caesar's absence, fellow patricians, Brutus and Cassius, describe him as 'mighty Caesar', a man who 'has now become a God', and strides in the world 'as a Colossus' . It is therefore evident that his close subordinates are jealously affected by his power, an effect which will later germinate into conspiracy. Even after his assassination, Caesar's ghost continues the task of perpetuating the fear of his everlasting power on those he influenced. Caesar holds enough power over his subjects that he is capable of influencing them continually, in his life and…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Caesar Assassination

    • 2336 Words
    • 10 Pages

    [ 2 ]. Phil Grabsky, I, Caesar: Ruling the Roman Empire (London: BBC Publications, 1997), 40-…

    • 2336 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the funeral orations in Julius Caesar it is evident that the perspective of Brutus on Caesar and his death are driven by his bias. Brutus’ avid patriotism results in his bias against Caesar, and consequently he puts the good of Rome before his loyalty to Caesar. This bias is represented effectively through the use of antithesis – “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more”. Brutus believed that Caesar had a fatal flaw that put his beloved country in great jeopardy – ambition. This is represented through “As Caesar loved me, I weep for him…but as he was ambitious, I slew him” (Act3 Sc2). The use of parallelism unfortunately highlights this bias and exposes the flaws in Brutus’ reasoning as it contrasts three great attributes (love, valour, fortune) with only one supposed flaw. It is Brutus’ innate bias that leads him to believe that one flaw justifies the death of a great ruler.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Julius Caesar, a play written by William Shakespeare many characters could have been questioned in terms of their motives and will. But then we have Brutus, a complex character torn between personal loyalty and public duty, a man with good intentions, motivated by the concern for the well-being of the Romans. In this essay, we will take a look at why Brutus, a person portrayed to be respectable in status and character murdered Julius Caesar, in the tragedy Julius Caesar.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: Shakespeare, William, and Roma Gill. Othello. New ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Print.…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, the virtue of honor can be interpreted in many ways. The protagonist of the play, Marcus Brutus supports this thought shown through his idealistic view of the world and by showing his patriotism towards Rome. Mark Antony perfectly fits the description of an honorable man as he remains loyal to Caesar and avenges the death of his friend. Cassius, on the other hand, is seen as a character who lacks integrity and honor for his actions are accomplished through his personal beliefs and out of jealousy, ignoring the general good. Marcus Brutus, Mark Antony, and Cassius are significant characters that are portrayed in this play to show how their different…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics