Preview

Emperor Nero: The Great Fire Of Rome

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
195 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Emperor Nero: The Great Fire Of Rome
Emperor Nero, the final ruler of the Julio-Claudian dynasty, ruled the Roman Empire from 54 AD to 68 AD. When he was only 16, his father died, and he became the emperor of Rome. As the mother of a very young ruler, Nero’s mother tried to influence and control Nero, and she also murdered many of her political rivals. Nero’s relationship with his mother quickly declined, terminating in his mother’s exile from his palace. Five years after Nero took power, he killed his mother. When, he divorced his first wife, he had her exiled and later killed.
After the death of his mother and wife, Nero became very interesting in art, and he also sang and danced.
In the year 64 AD, the Great Fire of Rome caused immense destruction. Nero is infamously

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    During the first few years of Nero’s reign, Agrippina held much influence over her son and political affairs. Because Nero was 17 at the time he became Emperor, and not yet old enough to rule,…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Domitian, 51-96 CE, was the last emperor of the Flavian dynasty. His mother and sister died when he was young and his father, Vespasian, and elder brother, Titus, were away in the military. Domitian’s father, made him his representative, but Mucianus, his second in command. Domitican focused on arts and literature over politics. Titus died in 81 CE and Domitian was named Emperor. Domitian inherited few military successes and economic downturn. He raised taxes, devalued the money, and paid for costly arts programs, such as, the Capitoline Games, a sporting event (Donahue). Domitian caused repressed the Roman people. He killed people on the Roman Upper class and Christians. Additionally, Domitian killed his cousin, Flavius Clemins in 96 CE. The Praetorian Guard, backed by the Senate and the royal family, murdered him. Domitian inherited a Roman Empire and by the end of his reign of 15 years, he brought. Post-mortem, Domitian was given a damnation memoriae to erase his memory from history. His death led to the Nervan-Antonian…

    • 4407 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Titus Flavius Vespasian was well known for restoring peace and stability to an empire in disarray following the death of Nero in A.D. 68. In the process he established the Flavian dynasty as the legitimate successor to the imperial throne.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar told one person of his adventures. That one person spread the story all over Rome! They say Julius made the “Tents of Fire” since he built Vulcan’s original “Tent of Fire”. Julius memorized the blueprints and continued…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the rapid turnover of emperors following the death of Nero in 68 AD, Vespasian prepared his own bid for power. The legions of Egypt, Judaea, Syria and then the Danube all declared for him, and he sent his commander Primus ahead to secure Italy on his behalf. A major, and bloody, victory was achieved at Cremona, and Primus took Rome in December 69 AD. The senate passed a law conferring the powers of emperor on Vespasian and he arrived in Rome in the late summer of 70 AD, having left his elder son Titus in charge in Judaea. Jerusalem was taken in August 70 AD and the Jewish temple was…

    • 112 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Both Agrippina and Gnaeus gained something from their marriage. By Gnaeus marrying a “Julian Princess”, or woman from the Julian bloodline, he was made consul in AD32 for a year by Caligula, extended from the usual six month period. Apart from the protection Gnaeus provided for Agrippina, the birth of Agrippina’s only child, Nero, was another. Nero, born as Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus was born in AD37, breech. A baby being born breech was widely perceived as ill-omened, however, ill-omened was how Agrippina’s life was said to be, predicted by a soothsayer that her son, in the future,…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Agrippina was losing her power with her son, he slowly let people that were aligned with his mother go, like the praetorian guards in a plan steer Nero back into embrace of his mother, she threatened to back his brother Britannicus . In many more signs of breaking free from his mother, he started a love affair with Poppsea Sabina a woman respected reputation once again rebellion to do what he wished an to rule as he sees fit in time he kills his mother. With the 3, gone he had free range to rule which meant people suffered a great deal, around this time a new religion surfaced which was Christianity this would be a constant conundrum for the Romans in general the response of Nero was to set some of the later actions of…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Augustus’ dynasty included the unpopular Tiberius (14-37 A.D.), the bloodthirsty and unstable Caligula (37-41) and Claudius (41-54), who was best remembered for his army’s conquest of Britain. The line ended with Nero (54-68), whose excesses drained the Roman treasury and led to his downfall and eventual suicide. Four emperors took the throne in the tumultuous year after Nero’s death; the fourth, Vespasian (69-79), and his successors, Titus and Domitian, were known as the Flavians; they attempted to temper the excesses of the Roman court, restore Senate authority and promote public welfare. Titus (79-81) earned his people’s devotion with his handling of recovery efforts after the infamous eruption of Vesuvius, which destroyed the towns of Herculaneum and Pompeii.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Scullard, H. H. (2003). From the Gracchi to Nero: A history of Rome, 133 B.C. to A.D. 68. [S.l.]: Routledge.…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people have come to the conclusion that Nero did not start the Great Fire of Rome. They have come to this conclusion based on the fact that he was not there at the time to ignite the fire. Also he had witnesses who saw where he was at the time of the fire. Being that Nero was disliked, he was framed for a fire that started accidentally. Many myths about Nero circulated about him being the one who started the fire which accredited to his bad reputation. Nero did not start the Great Fire of Rome because he was not present during the time the fire started, myths were started about him, and was framed for the fire because he was disliked.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While initially seen as a fair ruler this can be most contributed to the level heads and knowledge given from those who primarily advised the young ruler, and as his advisers left him to his own resources we can see the slow decline and shift in Emperor Nero’s priorities and desires. His perceived lack of caring for the support of the Roman people that eventually promulgated his down fall and resulted in his death. In other words best intentions are often laid barren and to waste when focus is…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He killed his mother, step-brother and two wives, but did he? He killed the Christians and many senates, but did he? He burnt Rome and built his palace upon the burnt remains of the city, but did he? Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus or more known as Rome’s youngest emperor, Nero. He rose into power and became the ruler of the world's largest, most powerful and dominant empire; the Roman Empire, only at the age of 17. His mother; Agrippina the Younger is known to be the main reason behind his imperial power, as her desires to control were fulfilled through her control of him, thus she was indirectly ruling the Empire through her young son. Moreover, Rome’s new young and loved emperor was soon hated and blamed for many crimes that he may or may not…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Emperor Nero was a sick human being who seriously lacked humility. He thought of himself as a god and would perform inhumane deeds such as stealing from sacred temples or killing innocent Christian people. Nero roughly killed about one hundred thousand Christians for no good reason whatsoever. He would use them to light up his parties or he would throw them into the gladiator pit, facing them against ferocious animals or deadly ruthless warriors. Nero's serious lack of humility caused him to perform poorly as a leader. If Nero had shown more humility throughout his time as leader, he would most likely have been not only a better person, but also a better leader. A good leader needs to display virtue in order to lead his people to…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Romulus, the first king, was the founder of the great Roman Empire. Founding Rome in 753 BC, he killed his brother, Remus, to consolidate his power. After a few years he convinced Sabine woman to become Roman wives known as matronae. The people thought of Romulus as a great and respected king. He was seeking the best for his people as shown when he convinces the sabine women to stay and become roman wives, or…

    • 76 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rome a symbol of strength, empowerment and prosperity for many, leaving no doubt in modern historians thoughts that this utopia was one of the most prominent of the ancient era’s. One dynasty within this epoch stands out, as being one of the most provocative and influential was the Julio-Claudian dynasty. This period was introduced with the instigation of the emperor Julio Augustus, known as one of the most appreciated emperors in Roman history. After Augustus came the rulers Tiberius, Gaius Germanicus (Caligula), Claudius and Nero. With every new ruler the amount of power and wealth in the city swelled, some even say that it was the golden age of Roman literature and arts. Each of these power broker’s have one person in common, apart from imperial extravagance and notoriety, they all have felt the sting of Julia Agrippina’s manipulative powers (The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2013). When studying Agrippina it is found that many of the sources do not retain a sympathetic view of the During the Julio-Claudian era Agrippina the younger only retained her power through the manipulation of her son, husband and peers. By doing this she made herself on the most powerful women in Rome.…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays