Preview

Embryo Research Cons

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
533 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Embryo Research Cons
In today’s society, a lot of people focus on the emotional view rather than the bigger picture or logic behind why using embryonic stem cells for research is beneficial. The use of embryonic stem cells for research has raised a huge issue among the ethical and political groups throughout many countries. This topic remains substantially controversial because of its association between life and death. Although some ethical and political groups may believe that it is morally wrong to deliberately take the life away from an innocent human being, stems cells for research does not have to come from others who lives have been taken away for the purpose of research and does have beneficial factors. Therefore, the stem cells from aborted embryos should …show more content…
Firstly, couples who do not have that choice when it come to the decision to abort may feel as if the pregnancy was not meant to be and may consider donating their embryo to save others’ lives. Secondly, many couples donate because they fear that abortion clinics will discard embryos after they leave the clinic. Lastly, most couples who donate are going through In Vitro Fertilization (also known as IVF treatment). IVF treatment is basically a treatment for couples who experience fertility issues. This treatment is the process of combining a sperm and an egg in a laboratory then later implanted into a women uterus. Sometime this procedure does not go as planned so many couples who go through this type of treatment donate to stem cell research. Another outcome to why some IVF patients might donate is because there are too many leftover embryos that can either be frozen or donated. According to the “Egg Donation for Stem Cell Research: Ideas of Surplus and Deficit in Australian IVF Patients’ and Reproductive Donors’ Accounts,” article a woman discussed how left over embryos can occur. The woman explained that she had 15 eggs taken out, but out of the 15 eggs only 1 was fertilized and became an embryo. The women then had gotten pregnant but miscarried at 10 weeks. She decided to give IVF treatment another try but this time she had 30 eggs taken out instead of 15. She mentioned that this second round of IVF treatment was very painful. So out of the 30 eggs, only eight were successful to implant. After one egg implanted, she became pregnant and decided to freeze the remaining seven embryos (Waldby & Carrol 520). Although this woman did not donate her eggs, it shows the process of how left over embryos occurs and shows why some couples who undergo this type of treatment are willing to donate to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Embryonic Stem Cell Research Is Not Ethical. Dennis P. Hollinger. At Issue: The Ethics of Genetic Engineering. Ed. Maurya Siedler. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005.…

    • 2675 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However it is arguable that these spare embryos would have gone to waste (or potential lives ended) if they had not been donated for medical research any way. As it can be seen for the greater good, instead of going to waste these embryos will play some part in assisting the advancement of medical uses of stem cells. Couples who use fertility treatment in order to rule out embryos with a genetic disorder can have their healthy embryos implanted whilst instead of the remaining being disregarded can be used for more disease specific research and can be more effective than the results from animal…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The real controversy in stem cell research lays in the termination (abortion) of the embryo, which is an entirely independent debate altogether. The embryonic stem cells extracted for research are being derived from embryos that are being aborted regardless (Johansen). Therefore, there is a macrocosmic debate more powerful than the one about stem cell research itself. By harvesting these stem cells from babies predestined to abortion, at least a contribution is being made to society – one that can benefit a multitude of people, perhaps suffering from a multitude of conditions. Even if one wants to debate the ethics of stem cell research, the researchers are being ethically unethical, with regard to the abortions guaranteed to take place.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Goldstein in his article “Providing Hope Through Stem Cell Research” determines “Ethically validated pluripotent stem cell research provides new hope for desperately ill people.”(84) , it is a risk for ethics. Moreover, the CBHD in the article “Human Stem Cell Research Is Unethical” implies “To manipulate and destroy huan embryos should make us all awake at night”(97). Thus, abiding by human embryonic stem cell research can easily create a guilty conscious. Furthermore, the CBHD declares that in the past there were numerous experiments which were driven by a crass utilitarian ethos which results in the creation of a “sub-class” of human beings, allowing the rights of the few to be sacrificed for the sake of potential benefit to many(98). Therefore, to victimize one human being in order to rescue another human being , undoubtfully, is unethical, tyrannical and against the human dignity. The CBHD also adds that “...we recognize that we are simply not freee to pursue good ends via unethical means of all human beings, embryos are the most defenseless against abuse”(99). From this viewpoint, destroying these defenseless human being is also unethical and may not be ignored. Briefly, human embryonic stem cell research is unethical and should be…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Embryonic stem cell research is widely controversial in the scientific world. Issues on the ethics of Embryonic Stem (ES) cell research have created pandemonium in our society. The different views on this subject are well researched and supportive. The facts presented have the capability to support or possibly change the public's perspective. This case study is based on facts and concerns that much of the research done on embryonic stem cells is derived from human embryos. This case study will provide others with a more in depth view of both sides of this great debate.…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most of the controversy surrounding embryonic stem cell research stems from the idea that the destruction of human embryos is equivalent to killing a human being. While I do believe human life is sacred and should be protected at all costs, I also believe that if there’s a way to cure millions of people of disease then we should assess how we should go about doing that. To me, curing grandpa’s lung disease using four to five day old blastocysts seems like a reasonable option in comparison to letting him die and rendering the embryos utterly useless as they’ll sit in a freezer or be eventually thrown away. Right to Life Michigan argues that scientists shouldn’t use embryonic stem cell research because 90% of couples choose to use their embryos for future pregnancies (If They Say… You Say…). In reality, the government requires complete disclosure to the couple and their consent before scientists can do anything with their embryos (National Institutes of Health Guidelines on Human Stem Cell Research). The benefit of helping sick and ailing people is exponentially greater than letting embryonic stem cells sit and collect…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life is defined as the existence of an individual human being or animal. There is a plethora of controversy about when life truly starts. Does it start right when the sperm meets the egg? Does it start when the fetus develops enough to feel? Most have their own opinion on this topic, but if “killing” an embryo can save lives it might be worth it. General stem cell research has been going on for many years, but due to cut funding, advancements have been inhibited. It was cut because embryonic stem cells research is considered unethical, but embryonic stem cells open a whole new realm of possibilities. The debate of using these stem cells has been argued for a long period of time. Certain stem cell research may be considered unethical, but the…

    • 2096 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Embryonic Stem Cell Research is an important process that is already allowing scientists to test new drugs and figure out the cause of birth defects. The process is very delicate because scientists must work with a four to ten day old blastocyst to get the stem cells. They put the stem cells into a petri dish along with proteins and enzymes. The stew of cells, enzymes, and proteins is what helps regenerate the bad tissues that cause diseases. “Blastocysts can also potentially be created from a donor egg”(“Embryonic Stem Cell Research:The Facts, Page 1). This quote taken from a children’s hospital disproves the idea of destroying a human egg. Since the egg has not yet been fertilized scientists are not destroying human life. Adult stem cells…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    save lives. Why would you risk taking one life of an embryo then implanting it into another life…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Embryonic stem cells can potentially cause tumors due to the rapid growth when injected into adults. Another big issue with the research of the embryonic stem cells is that in the far future, this could lead to the knowledge on human cloning. Seeing as embryonic stem cells come from the embryos, adult stem cells biggest advantage is that the body’s own stem cells can be used, effectively removing the problems of immune rejection or abnormalities. Many people who are religious would argue that harvesting the embryo is against belief. This is a main controversy because these people believe that the four-five day old embryo has a soul and is evidently murdered when harvested. They believe that the research on these cells violates the sanctuary of life. Their argument is that the embryo in the situation is a potential human being and see the fertilized egg as starting a…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics of Stem Cell Research

    • 2751 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Stem cell research represents a new opportunity for ethical thought and debate. Stem cells are primitive cells which have yet to specialize. Through proper coaxing, stem cells can be made to differentiate into usable body cells and eventually used for medical treatment. Though stem cell technology has been in development since the 1960’s, it was not until August of 2001, when then-president George W. Bush announced that federal funds could be allotted to embryonic stem cell research, that the issue became a hot political topic. The matter is argued with vehement fervor, but the quarrels are wrought with emotivism and partisanship more than actual valid and cogent arguments. In fact, stem cell research has a very broad range of ethical implications. The normative ethical theories, the abortion debate, and even business ethics all have a place in the discussion due to the different new moral challenges which are prompted by this blossoming technology.…

    • 2751 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The population of the United States is much divided on the subject of stem cell research. The majority of the controversy surrounds the fact that, during the process of harvesting embryonic stem cells, the embryo is destroyed. Comparable to the abortion debate, some people believe that an embryo, no matter how old, is considered a human and should be given respect as well as the right to life. There is also concern that…

    • 2234 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This debate on embryonic stem cell research has held on over three decades. The controversy has not ended at this time. The controversy is about the work that holds immense promises from the scientific end and the opponents who view them as giving less value to human life. The most recent debate uses the very early part of development of stem cells for the potential to be alleviate conditions ranging from diabetes to Alzheimer's Disease. In 2001 the Bush Administration proclaimed a policy that permits some research with federal funds used with very strict rules. This policy has gathered little support three years later from the…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although there is no doubt that certain diseases could be treated if this therapy is successful, there are contrasting viewpoints concerning the issue. Currently, scientists all over the nation are struggling to gain clearance to experiment with embryonic stem cells. On one side arguers say that embryonic stem cell research is morally acceptable because any therapy that can lead to curing serious diseases is beneficial to the common good. They argue that embryonic stem cells are not yet individuals therefore they have no soul and no rights to speak of. Even the arguers that believe stem cells could possibly be considered individuals, would say that such a small sacrifice would be worth the advances at stake. They say that if such a leap can be made in medicine, then it is the scientists ' and doctors ' duty to do everything in their power to make people well. Advocates of stem cell research would argue that it would be unethical not to proceed with this research. For every advocate of stem cell research there is an…

    • 2842 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    From a scientist’s point of view, embryonic stem cells have a huge potential to revolutionize the field of regenerative medicine and tissue engineering as they hold the ability to produce all cell lineages including the germ line. This would provide the gateway for the treatment of a wide range of diseases where the body is incapable of repairing itself. However, some people especially religious communities hold strong objections regarding the use of human embryos in scientific research (De Wert, 2003) (Orive, 2003). The main point being that since “new life begins at the point of conception”, the embryo should hold full human rights (Daley, G.Q. et al., 2007). Nevertheless, there are different legislations in place in different countries regarding the use of human embryonic stem cells. In UK, embryonic stem cell research can only be carried out with authority from the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays