Preview

Economic Difference Between North And South Industrialization

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
617 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Economic Difference Between North And South Industrialization
Webster defines economics as "the science concerned with the making, selling, and using of goods” or in lame man terms wants and needs fulfilled with limited resources. The north and south had many differences due to diversification within their economies; such as; crop differences to the imposed tariffs on them to economic need for cheap labor i.e. slaves. The framers of the Constitution specifically tried to avoid dealing with slavery because at one time or another it was a critical part of their economic stability. These differences became noticeable and tension between the two started to kindle.
One difference in economics was Industrialization verses Agriculture. In the north industrialization began while the south agricultural demand for cotton became great in the textile industry, which in turn caused the southern plantation culture to spread. According to Davis, slavery was a culture and society in the South that created a “broad economy dominated by cotton, rice, tobacco and sugar” (p.8). Even thought the south dominated the agricultural industry, the north still had some type of presence in the agricultural industry. In fact the majority of the north was still
…show more content…
Social and cultural differences did not exist between the North and the South, they both prayed to the same god, spoke the same language, shared songs and ancestry alike; however the only difference was “slave labor” verses “free labor”. Slaves were not only important within the labor and economic infrastructures; it was the heart of the Southern economy. This was the cheapest of all types of labor, no payroll with exuberant profits. On the flip side free labor had its costs. According to Forner, “Free labor meant labor with economic choices, with the opportunity to quit”, a big labor difference from the South (p.16). Slave labor had no choice to quit; they did not have the right to do

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    FRQ APUSH North vs. South

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Economically, the South had one relied resource and one only: cotton. It was the root of their profits, their lives, their surroundings. Despite the white majority of the 1860’s not being a part of the planter aristocracy, it was still their personal American Dream: to own slaves on a plantation with a pretty wife and white kids. The Southern economy depended primarily on the production and working of slaves, as the cheap labor force. On the industrial hand, the North was all about hard work and…equal rights, but mostly hard work. Their primary focus for economic gain was industry. Railroads, telegraphs, machines…oh my! The North also had the advantage of economic stability from the California Gold Rush which aided them to flourish dramatically, though plummeted during the Panic of 1857, which negatively affected the North due to the inflation caused by the gold. Once California was accepted into the Union (as a free state), its abundance of gold deposits held the North on its high horse before the reoccurring panics.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fact that the south’s economy was based off of agricultural goods was one of the reasons that slavery became so common down there. Compared to the south,…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3.Due to the substantial differences between the North’s industrial economy and the South’s agricultural economy they both had distinct advantages and disadvantages during the war. To begin with, the North’s economy was far superior to the South’s because the North had two-thirds of the nation’s population, two-thirds of the railroad mileage, and almost 90% of the nation’s industrial output. Also, many of the North’s arm factories were equipped with mass production which allowed them to compete with the gun manufacturing centers and armories of the South. The Northern economy helped them have much greater supply of resources compared to the South. On the other hand, the Confederacy had slaves which helped provide food for the army and provide the most important good of all, cotton. The South was able to use cotton as diplomatic weapon which they thought they could use to persuade France or Britain to assist or side with the Confederacy. We can also see this as a disadvantage to the Northern economy because they had no such tool or weapon to use to obtain foreign assistance or aid. Unfortunately this same advantage for the South also led to a severe disadvantage. Because the majority of the people living in the South did not own slaves, they were not the ones producing cotton. This meant that the majority of the…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The South's predominant economic principle before the War of Northern Aggression was "Cotton is King." The South, as it was known around the turn of the 19th century, was solely dependent upon its cotton production. Low prices, unmarketable goods, and over-used land were driving the necessity for slavery and the need for cotton production out. Were it not for a Yankee's ingenuity, the South as we study it now may have been vastly different.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concern to grow cotton expanded to other cash crops and cattle and hogs which meant to the demand on large number of cheap labors, as what it called as slaves (485). Meanwhile, the northern grew up its economic was more into industry. One of the industry was a textile industry which processes the raw cotton into the finished goods. The disparity between the two parts in a country in terms of economic strategy was the most critical issues. Despite of focusing on the city life and flexibility as the Northerners did, the Southerners still continued to uphold an antiquated social order.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Northern soil was in favor of small farms and less agriculture than the South, but industry flourished throughout the North due to an abundance of natural resources (North and South). With no nearby slave trading companies either; the north was more inclined to promote free-labor. On the other hand, the Southern warm climate and soil favored large plantations to grow crops such as tobacco and cotton that required a lot of manpower to produce (North and South). Also, the slave trade was very ample around the Southern states. With places such as the West Indies harboring many slave trading companies the Southern people could obtain slaves easily to work their expansive farms and plantations.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Killer Angels

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages

    While the North lightly interpreted the United States Constitution, and while pursuing industrialization and the expansion of cities, the South remained mostly agricultural. During this period in America, it seemed as if there was a major divide in the country and even completely different cultures had evolved that despised one another. The abolishment of slavery was the mechanism for which the North tried to change the South into a more modern society without the use of slave labor, which eventually caused the Civil War to be fought.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the South, the economy came to rely on cotton and slave labor. Cotton became one of the greatest sources of wealth…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The relations between the North and South had disagreements over taxes. The North raised the taxes appointed by Congress on imported goods to support their industrial development. On the contrary, in the South, being an agricultural economy had to buy machinery from the foreign and ending paying for those high taxes. On the 1850s, Congress increased the import tax from 15 to 37 percent. The South threatened the northern mandataries; consequently, the north was offended. Besides, Chicago Daily Times published that if the South withdraws from the north, the economy could be affected as income cutting in half (Stanley, 2011). The southerners were unhappy in how the North was limiting their earnings.…

    • 112 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The economies of both the North and the South experienced a dramatic change as well. The Southern economy had printed false money, causing a huge increase in inflation, while the North's economy was stable. Due to this rise in inflation, and the Emancipation Proclamation, the plantation system failed. All of this, on top of a blockade held by the North, all hurt the Southern economy.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How was life in the North different from the South LIfe in the North had a lot of differences than life in the South. They both had different economies, societies, geographies and transportation. For example, the North’s economy was based on working on industrial machines and the South’s economy was based on working on their farms and picking cotton out of their fields, those are two totally different economies.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The North and South were very different from each other. Their disagreements led them along very different paths. Let's discuss the differences between the North and the South. The North had an economy based on manufacturing, whereas the South had an economy based on agriculture.…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Decision Essay

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The North and the South had very different views on slavery which only grew stronger and separated the two regions leading up to the Civil War. As the Union gained more land the big question was whether the new land would be considered a slave state or a free state. The South needed slaves to do hard labor on their land to keep the economy growing. The North did not have a need for slaves. They feared that allowing slavery in the North would increase large plantations in the area which would threaten their own growing industrial economy. An underlying issue with the South was the fear that the federal government would take control over the individual states and their rights, especially concerning slavery.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Since the Southern economy relied greatly on slave labor, the majority of money was in the possession of the slave owners.xxvi This was a bad thing. The owners had everything invested in this institution, so commercial and service industries received no economic support.xxvii The railway system was an example of a service industry. Without transportation, trading and travel were rendered impossible. This missing element particularly stunted the South’s development because anyone who was not a wealthy slave owner in the South was sequestered in their respective area and had little opportunity to be exposed to other societies. While the North was industrialized and covered with train tracks, the South relied on an agricultural democracy where the white man always prevailed. This was not only detrimental to the economy, but as historian Jenny Wahl, puts it, “it reinforced racial stereotyping.”xxviii Southerners were essentially forced to believe that blacks were inferior and had a specific place in society, because their economy required them as workers. When an economic model within a region relies on brutal labor of the subordinate class and cannot be changed without altering the beliefs of the people within this region, then it should not be considered a viable economic…

    • 2384 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    They believed they owned the slaves—not as people but as property. This sense of ownership blinded slave owners with greed and self-indulgence. They were focused on making profits and abusing their “property.” They were working towards immorality and corruption without the slightest remorse of their actions. However, there were some owners who, compared to others, treated their workers with a bit more compassion. These owners taught their laborers how to read and write. They, although seemingly cruel to their fellow Northerners, didn’t abuse their right of ownership. Instead of completely taking control of a slave’s mind, they gave him a taste of the outside world to suppress their rebellious mindsets. Owning slaves gave southerner’s power over them, granting them…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays