Eat Your Bugs Analysis

The texts “Eat Your Bugs” by Miguel Vilar and Laura Allen “Insect Farmers...” by the Washington Post have both similarities and differences. First, both Bugs are healthy for you. For example, on page 22 of “Eat Your Bugs” the text states crickets and grasshoppers are loaded with calcium. Similarly, on page 1 of “Insect Farmers” it says among the world people are eating caterpillars, ants, and beetles.This is similar because people are eating bugs and the two texts say that bugs are healthy for you. In both cases… the texts state that bugs are nutritious and have vitamins and good things inside of them.

A second similarity is bugs are better for the environment.
For example on page 24 of “Eat Your Bugs” the text states that bugs are better for the
One way the texts differ is one text says there is plenty of bugs, while the other says there is not enough. On page 24 of “Eat Your Bugs” the text states that there are 200 million bugs for each person alive. In contrast, on page 2 of “Insect Farmers” it says the conversation are now about the logistics of farming insects for humans to eat.This information differs because in the article Eat Your Bugs the article has plenty of bus, but in the article Insect Farmers they need more bugs.In conclusion… these article are different because one article has plenty of bugs, and one article needs more bugs.

Another difference is one article doesn’t have a problem with eating bugs, but the other article does.For example on page 22 of “Eat Your Bugs” the text states 80 percent of people around the world eat bugs. In contrast, on page 2 of “Insect Farmers.” it says some food companies have an ickiness issue will keep customers from paying for crickets .This information differs because the article eat your bugs, people are eating bug, but in insect farmers people have an icky feeling. To sum things up… one article people eats bugs, but in the other people have an icky