Preview

Due Process Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1311 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Due Process Case Study
Principle Eight: Due Process
In simplest terms, when a school terminates an employee, he or she should know the charges against them. In reality, the laws and guidelines surrounding the termination process is more complex. The process involves documentation, timelines, and hearings. Additionally, not all employees even qualify for due process.
Idaho statute calls for three categories of certified teachers.
• Category I employees are certified employees with one year contracts. No further notification is required to terminate the contract at the end of the school year.
• Category 2 employees are certified personal with one and two years of continuous employment with the same school district. If this employee is not rehired at the end
…show more content…
This information dovetails with the evaluation process. Some personnel issues do arise which require immediate attention, but others occur and are not addressed during the year because administrators do not evaluation, provide feedback, and document. Using the performance review process correctly will ideally lead to solid performance. As an administrator, I would contact my district office to notify them if I felt any employee was not performing up to standard. I know my superintendent would want to know if I felt corrective action was necessary. I believe it is important not to have surprises if an employee is close to termination and it is the first time the district office is informed of the situation. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972)
Facts: Roth was hired as a professor at Wisconsin State University for one year, with the possibility of an extension. He was not rehired and not given a reason, or the possibility of challenging the decision. Roth sued the school.
Issues: Where Roth’s Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process violated?
Ruling: The United States Supreme Court ruled Roth’s rights were not violated by Wisconsin State University’s decision. He was not entitled to a reason or to challenge their decision to withdraw their offer of
…show more content…
The University did not harm Roth’s reputation or prevent him from gaining employment as a professor. The contract in place was for one year, with an extension if both parties agreed. Wisconsin State University chose not to hire Roth, but did not injure his future career substantially.
Conclusion: This case is important because certified staff members have due process rights. These rights depend on the category under which they were hired. Administrators need to be cognizant of which category an employee belongs to and follow the processes carefully. It is expensive to recruit, hire and train new employees. The goal should always be to counsel employees and correct behavior. However, there are times when disciplinary action and termination will occur. Understanding and following the due process outline is critical to avoid frustration and potential

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mantor v Circuit city inc

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A year after Circuit City, Inc terminated Mantor’s employment he brought a civil action in state court alleging twelve causes of action.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Relevant Points & Blurbs relating to whether a Superintendent can be terminated from his/her position (outside of tenure charges)…

    • 1034 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This case is based upon Mr. Stanbury, who worked as a project manager for Signal Construction from 1984 to 1985, and was fired allegedly because he was "not doing his job properly," according to Signal's personnel manager. But nevertheless, the termination reason that Signal informed Mr. Stanbury was due to "lack or reduction in work". Mr. Stanbury took legal action against Signal Construction for defamation. This is because he claims that a manager of Signal Construction (who had never observed, monitored, evaluated or read an evaluation of his) gave a derogatory statements reference to a possible future employer.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case was between Hosanna-Tabor Lutheran Church and School against Equal Employment opportunity commission. The church ran school that offered Christ centered education. One of their employees was Cheryl Perich who taught both secular and religious subjects. She began working for the school in 1999 and was committed to giving quality services in her education and leading prayers. In 2004, she suffered a certain condition known as Narcolepsy and she had to quit teaching on a disability leave. In 2005, she notified the principal that she could resume her duties on February that year after the doctors had cleared her of her condition. The principal informed her that she had to wait a little longer because she had been replaced. She was angry and threatened to sue the school, which led to her firing.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, a principal who was reassigned to the central office was not entitled to a hearing since he would continue to receive his regular salary and benefits; deprivations related to professional satisfaction and reputation did not constitute actionable injuries. In contrast, the Sixth Circuit reasoned that a collective bargaining agreement specifying that teachers may not be transferred except for “good cause” and “extenuating circumstances” established a property interest in a particular position in a specific…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lairen

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages

    enables me for early release to work during the 2013-14 school year. I am currently…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tutu Campaign

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thomas in Minnesota. Tutu was attacked because of statements he made criticizing Israeli policy toward the Palestinians that some Jewish individuals said were “anti Semitic.” Marv Davidov, an adjunct professor with the Justice and Peace Studies program at the University of St. Thomas said: As a Jew who experienced real anti-Semitism as a child, I’m deeply disturbed that a man like Tutu could be labeled anti-Semitic and silenced like this,… I deeply resent the Israeli lobby trying to silence any criticism of its policy. It does a great disservice to Israel and to all Jews. After provoking a strong backlash against the decision, and a campaign lead by Jewish Voice for Peace in support of the Arch Bishop which produced more than 6,000 letters of protest, the University rescinded the ban. Professor Bill Robinson was also a target of a similar campaign about alleged anti Semitism to get him fired at the University of California Santa Barbara (UCSB). Ultimately the University administration defended Robinson’s academic freedom and the right to express his opinions in his global politics…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    against the expulsion of Doug Hann from Brown University. In the letter to the editor…

    • 393 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Tenure Debate

    • 1920 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This paper discusses several key issues surrounding the practice of teacher tenure, an often controversial and emotional subject in the arena of public education. The protection or terminations of teachers, lack of tenure in other occupations, the cost/benefit ratio, as well as the future of tenure are addressed.…

    • 1920 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case was happened on the 7th of March 2000. Gordon Gillingham was president and CEO of Northeastern Mutual Life which was the major subsidiary of the Calgary Insurance Group, and this company operated life insurance, reinsurance, general insurance and investment, and other activities in North American and internationally. Since Northeastern Mutual Life’s return on common equity had declined steadily during past four years, so he had to decide how to reduce costs, and balance shareholder and employee interests. Therefore Gordon’s decision would lead to some problems, such as whether or not cut employees from his company (Ken Mark, 2002, p.4-5).…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Human Rm

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pittsburgh Board of Public Education in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, as required by state law, keeps lists of eligible teachers in order of their rank or standing. According to an “Eligibility List” form made available to applicants, no one may be hired to teach whose name is not within the top 10 percent of the names on the list. In 1996, Anna Reed was in the top 10 percent. She was not hired that year, although four other applicants who placed lower on the list—and not within the tip 10 percent—were hired. In 1997 and 1998, Reed was again in the top 10 percent, but she was not hired until 1999. Reed filed a suit in a federal district court against the board and others. She argued in part that the state’s requirement that the board keep a list constituted an offer, which she accepted by participating in the process to be placed on that list. She claimed that the board breached this contract by hiring applicants who ranked lower.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sky Is the Limit

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This case takes place at Hardwell University and is a great example of the problems that can arise from someone given too much power. Dr. Reginald Lear took over as the School’s president and was offered a compensation package, which ranked highly for college presidents exceeding $700,000. This fraud was much different in how it was discovered, as it was not an anonymous phone call or an auditor. The fraud was initially uncovered by a local news outlet who questioned Dr. Lear’s desire to purchase a new university airplane. The local media expressed concern about such a large investment during a time of budget cuts, layoffs, and tuition increases. They filed an open records request for copies of flight logs to determine if the president could justify spending an estimated $4 million on the plane. This ultimately led to them questioning many of his trips, including those to Alabama where he attended a black-tie event with the president there. After this was uncovered and questionable expenditures on the credit card were found the governor and chairman of the board appointed a special committee to investigate these allegations.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

    • 940 Words
    • 7 Pages

    6 Reporting and leaving at the work area is a must. Employees must log in upon entering or leaving the compound and fill…

    • 940 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In these sections we will be looking at the best way to issue a dismissal by following the right process. When dismissing an employee it is important that you prove that there is a good reason and the right procedure is followed. LRA recognise that the reason for dismissal can fall into the following categories…

    • 4780 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dianna Abdala

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages

    SUMMARY Dianna Abdala was graduate from Suffolk University’s Law School in 2005. She went for an interview at lawyer firm set up by William Korman who is a former state prosecutor and was being offered for a job. After accepting a job offer from William, Dianna send an email and leave a voicemail message to William stating that the job offer compensation was too low and she will not be accepting the offer. This displeased William as he had already start doing up all the preparation work like printing name cards and getting all the necessary stuff for Dianna to start work and he voiced out to Dianna that he was very disappointed at being played out. Dianna criticized William that a true lawyer would understand that so long there was no contract in placed, the job acceptance was not considered. William warned Dianna on her professionalism and whether she wanted to offend more experience lawyer at the beginning of her career where Dianna just laughed it off the whole exchange.…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays