Preview

Dualistic Model Of Thinking

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
673 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dualistic Model Of Thinking
In this physical world, every person wants happiness and peace of mind (Singh & Modi, 2012). People want happiness because it appears as the underlying factor behind all of our desire (Gutierrez, 2012). For example, if people want to own a car, the basic reason behind it is to have the ability to move from one place to another. If we dig deeper, the reason of that ability appears to have the happiness of carrying family members. Pursuing happiness can be obtained in various ways, from the pursuit of money, power, and possessions. This is an example of dualistic thinking in awakening happiness. Dualistic thinking provides the rigid and unhealthy viewpoint, which causes stress in humanity (Olson, 2002). Some philosophers suggest this thinking …show more content…
The types of thinking that separate right and wrong, body and spirit, reason and emotion, and masculine and feminine, which forces us to go into restrictive paradigm about our identity and how we should act. Dualism model of thinking has developed in western philosophy. It makes us to classify, categorize, and conceptualize our world that we live in (Pryer, 2003). All of these separations create the sense of awkwardness and disability to live the life to the fullest, make our mind busy and not in the present moment of …show more content…
When we deeply in touch with our deepest inner nature, we actually could communicate effectively and beautifully. Rosenberg, furthermore, explains there are some qualities that prevent us to really connect with others. Those qualities manifested as judgment, comparison, classification, and our ideas about what is right and wrong. They emerge as the representation of dualistic mind which already wired within our neurology. Therefore, we have tendency not to see things in the clarity of mind, but blurred with our perception of reality (Rinpoche, 2007). That phenomenon occurs as the roots of communication conflict or general conflict as we lives in the daily activities. The cause behind the conflict appears as a wrong perception and understanding (Hanh, 2013). If we dig deeper into the wrong perception, we will find the cause of aggression and violent act that emerges within human unconsciousness (Fromm, 1973). For example an aggression caused by perception that other people adapt the wrong belief system or an aggression because of hatred toward some groups. All of them rooted in the wrong perception, trapped in the dichotomy of right and wrong

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    David Sze (July 7, 2015) posted a column in the Huffington Post entitled, “Money and Happiness? It’s Complicated.” As the title suggests, Sze discusses the link between having money and finding happiness, or “life satisfaction.” He approaches the issue from a post-modern perspective without considering any transcendent categories to evaluate the issue. Leaving a theistic perspective out, Sze struggles to find an adequate explanation for meaning, happiness and satisfaction in life.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Novelist Ayn Rand, in her book Anthem, wrote, “My happiness is not the means to any end. It is the end. It is its own goal. It is its own purpose”. Although happiness may seem like a simple concept to many, sometimes we don’t recognize it but we always take different paths, face many obstacles, and spend most of our lives trying to achieve happiness. Depending on the circumstances, every person has their own definition of what it means to attain happiness, whether through wealth, success, health, love etc. Happiness is a notion that be developed by focusing on the smaller things in life which are not given a great deal of thought to, but still can heavily impact us. One of these smaller yet significant ideas in life is individualism. Today…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflict, whether it is between good and evil, strength and weakness or love and hate can define our true nature. It is the test of inner conflict that can ultimately reveal our altruistic qualities or magnify our malevolent character. How we choose to respond to the inner battles within ourselves may be used to judge our moral compass whereby our concealed intrinsic characteristics are exposed. Internal conflict often arises from personal decisions between right and wrong, evil and good and one’s mannerisms are put to the ultimate test whereby their actions delineates their true character and ambitions, whether it may be fuelled with self indulgence or…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lens Model of Conflict

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to our textbook, there are two fundamental aspects are important in all conflicts: (1) communication behaviors and (2) the perceptions of those behaviors. Think of the study of conflict as a view through a lens, like the lens of a camera, or through prescription glasses. The lens model of conflict specifies that each person has a view of (1) oneself, (2) the other person, and (3) the relationship. These perceptual pieces form the fundamental views of all conflicts, and combined together they form the mosaic of a particular conflict (Wilmot & Hocker 2010).…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today’s society teaches people to be happy but in that, they focus on the material items to make them happy. Many people in the world define happiness as living a good life or exceeding the expectations of others. But happiness begins with finding what is within, what is one’s true desires in life. People focus more on the price of life than life itself, and they tend to make happiness out of material objects and then not being happy in the end.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Instead, we will look to a second definition of happiness by Miriam-Webster presenting a definition that more reasonably proposes that happiness is one’s position on life rather than a transient feeling. Miriam-Webster states that happiness is “a state of well-being and contentment.” By introducing this idea of well-being to an explanation of the inspiration of happiness, Miriam-Webster’s definition suggests that different elements, such as health and comfort, are required to create happiness. Many people over the course of history have attempted to define happiness, and some definitions are quite interesting, however, who is to say that any of the definitions are correct or incorrect? To answer the original question asked, “What is happiness?” there is no definite way to define happiness, especially not a definition that will be valid for every person. Happiness is something that is achieved, and once achieved, that person knows that something is different. It is something strived towards in our society because there are so many people facing adversity that many are unable to find their happiness due to their worries. In his book, Brave New World, Aldous Huxley introduces a type of society quite different from our own in which happiness…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assess Dualism

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Human beings are material objects. However, unlike other material objects (e.g. non-living things) humans have the ability to form judgements and reason their existence. Meaning to say that, human beings have 'minds'. In general, humans are characterised as having both a mind and body. By definition, mind is referred to the mental processes, thought and consciousness whereas body is referred to the physical aspects of the brain-neurons and how the brain is structured. This is known as dualism.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Could one be happy if they lived in a society where all basic needs are provided for but the family structure we are used to, or the ability to travel to wherever or whenever we wish has limitations? Or what if happiness was pre-conditioned at birth to allow one to accept the social caste they are created into and then brainwashed to be happy? The ultimate goal of humans is to live a life of happiness; but at what cost? Some believe that food, clothing, shelter, and gainful employment, are some of the basic necessities of life. But, is happiness attained only when one’s life is full of luxuries, immediate gratification, and excess? We will evaluate happiness, family structure, and the freedom and limitation within More’s Utopia and Huxley’s Brave New World and determine the positive and negative aspects within each society.…

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Dualism

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The first argument I put forward to support dualism is; the brain and mind of human beings are different from each other. They both have unique properties and distinctive roles in human beings. The brain has definable characteristics that can be observed and analysed (Robinson, 2012, p.2). For example the activity of the brain when sleeping is examinable on electroencephalograms (Marieb & Hoehn, 2013, p.452). A magnetic resonance imaging reveals the location of different functions of the brain (Marieb & Hoehn, 2013, p.432¬). When dissected, the brain’s physical properties, such as size, shape and colour can be analysed (Robinson, 2012, p.2). On the other hand the mind is not discernible to science, it does not have physical properties like the brain. The mind is a mental awareness of the interactions occurring within and around the human body (Robinson, 2012, p.7). It observes and moderates our thoughts, emotions and reactions (Robinson, 2012, p.2). The mind is the human body’s mental state. It is private and only observable to other humans, by that human’s behaviour, actions and voiced output…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Argument of Dualism

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    . There are two kinds of dualism. One is Substance dualism which holds that the mind or soul is a separate, non-physical entity, but there is also property dualism, according to which there is no soul distinct from the body, but only one thing, the person, that has two irreducibly different types of properties, mental and physical. Substance dualism leaves room for the possibility that the soul might be able to exist apart from the body, either before birth or after death; property dualism does not. A substance dualism is something with "an independent existence". It can exist on its own. This holds that each distinct non-physical entity mind composed a different kind of substance to material objects. Substance dualist believed only spiritual substances can have mental properties. It is "soul" along with certain memory and psychological continuities that constitutes the survival of the person. Physical properties of property dualism are properties like having a certain weight, conducting electricity and mental properties are properties like believing that 1+1=2, being in love, feeling pain, and etc. Property dualism allows for the compatibility of mental and physical causation, since the cause of an action might under one aspect is describable as a physical event in the brain and under another aspect as a desire, emotion, or thought; substance dualism usually requires causal interaction between the soul and the body. Dualistic theories at least…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dualism

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The focus of the article “Dualism Defended” by J.P. Moreland is the conflict between Physicalism, the idea that the only thing that exists is matter, and Dualism, the idea that not just a body exists, but a mind/soul as well.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Against Dualism

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Thomas Nagel is correct to argue that, ‘dualism....is usually adopted on the grounds that it must be true, and rejected on the grounds that it can’t be.’ Such a seemingly paradoxical statement, which exists within what I will call the ontological common-senseness of the human experience, represents my position with regard to dualism, as will be argued within this essay. Acknowledging but notwithstanding the natural attraction to some sort of dualism, I will i) state that my case rests on two suppositions, ii) argue that the problem of causal interaction deals a fatal blow to Cartesian dualism, iii) argue that other types of dualism have inherent difficulties and iv), briefly, bring attention to an argument contending that the mind-body problem might actually be beyond solution due to the ontological apparatus borne by the human being.…

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dualism

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Question: In dualism about the mind and body a more plausible view than the view that we are purely physical beings? Give reason for your answer.…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dualism is believed mainly in religions such as Islam. Dualism states that the world is made up of two elemental categories which are incommensurable. This includes distinctions between mind and body, good and evil and universal and particular. Dualism supports the claim that each mind is an individual package that is attached to a physical being. From this theory our mental states and actions derive from uniqueness of our non physical substance.…

    • 3038 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mental Duality

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In studying Roger Sperry and A.L. Wigan’s work on mental duality, Roland Puccetti believed there were two people inside each human organism. By saying there were two people; Puccetti believed there were two minds with separate streams of consciousness that were therefore capable of separate volitions, or courses of action. Puccetti was attempting through science to justify dichotomous thinking, and therefore indirectly justify dichotomous concepts of good and evil. Critics of Puccetti often pointed to an introspective argument to counter his ideas. This argument was based on someone looking within oneself and realizing they had only one mind because they did not feel two streams of consciousness or separate volitions. This was based on the idea that at one exact point in time, a person seemed capable of realizing and reacting to only one stream of thought. Likewise, there was also a behavior-based argument to reject Puccetti’s hypothesis. This…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays