Preview

Drug war

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
625 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Drug war
War on drugs
I agree that the drug war should be fought because many people across the globe are using these illegal drugs can lead them to abuse, addiction, serious health problems, and even death. It is impossible to predict the effect that drugs can have on someone, especially if it’s the first time they try it and even if it’s a small amount or dose.
President Richard Nixon declared a "war on drugs" in 1971. The expectation then was that drug trafficking could be greatly reduced in a short time through federal policing and yet the war on drugs continues to this day, it's been over thirty years. It does not appear that a lot of progress has been made. Because there is no progress, the criminal justice system is filled with 1.55 million non-violent offenders, and their drug use is marked as a behaviour that is harmful to the society.
This is outrageous, this is the reason why the war cannot be won because innocent people are arrested for taking these drugs instead of the people who are making them and supplying them. New York Times Author, Dan Baldacci quoted " With less drugs, it allows the people and economy to grow in a positive direction. Less homelessness, dependency, crimes, and jail sentencing would be the direct result of tougher drug policies. If we are serious about a war on drugs, then we have to subject them to regulations and controls that minimise as far as possible their ability to do harm.” I think he is absolutely right because with prevention comes it makes goals easier to tackle.
People in favour of legalising drugs argue that the only way to win the war is to legalise these drugs to reduce crime rates I think this is horrendous, if we legalise drugs such as cocaine, heroine and etc. Their concept behind Legalization is an idea to lower crime rates, controlling the potency of powerful drugs, as a result to eliminate trades with other countries. Drug related crime rates would be a contributing factor in lowering of crime rates, and it’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Butts

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    So far this is good. However, Wilson also claims that keeping heroin and cocaine illegal contains the number of users, and so prevents a great number of harm. This is where I disagree. In Douglas Husak's, "Why we should decriminalize drug use", he argues against Wilson's claims. If frequency of drug use is a function of cost, then use will go up when as the cost goes down. and it is also true that economic models claim that cost will drop after decriminalization and would have an increase in use. But the predictions of cost and use after decriminalization assume that nothing else will change. However, many other things will change that could raise the price, reduce the use, and reduce the amount of harm that results from use. Therefore, the prediction of soaring use and harm is unsupported.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Prohibition vs War on Drugs

    • 2774 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Prohibition of Alcohol in the 1920©ˆs. These two major issues of their time may not…

    • 2774 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    More and more people are being incarcerated with less people being released and it is costing everybody. It is costing taxpayers to pay for prison upkeep, keeping the prisoners in the prison and the more money going to the prisons the less money going towards other important things such as education and pensions for retiring workers. Just one prisoner alone costs between $20,000 and $40,000 to keep in prison for just one year. If that is just one year alone imagine cost for the minimum 20 year sentences people have to serve for drug related crimes. There are way too many overcrowded prisons in the United States alone, which is not helping anybody. The “War on Drugs” needs to be approached in a different way, instead of throwing everyone in jail for everything we need to take a smarter more logical, more efficient approach to it. Recently in Ireland, they have decriminalized small amounts of heroin, cocaine and marijuana. The approach they take is to treat these addicts as they are, addicts instead of throwing them in jail and hoping the drugs stop circulating. They are planning to set up special rehab centers for the addicts to go so that they can get the rehab they need. Or if they aren’t ready to stop using drugs they have special rooms where they can do the drugs with medical personnel nearby to monitor them. This seems as though is it counteractive does it not? Although if you think about it, it is the…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think the “War on Drugs” had a negative impact on the affected communities because of the institutional racism that existed. Many individuals, especially minorities in low socioeconomic communities were unlawfully targeted. Individual rights were ignored to achieve agency standards to combat the inflation of drugs on the streets. Historically, a distrust remained constant between law enforcement and minority communities and only continued to decline during the War on Drugs era. Today, law enforcement as an institution continue to pick up the broken pieces and gain the trust of the communities in which they serve and protect.…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drugs: Americas Holy War

    • 1274 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the article “Drugs: America’s Holy War,” Arthur Benavie speaks of the social problems that can arise with the use and supply of illicit and illegal drugs. He begins asking the reader, who’s the enemy in this war on drugs? I asked myself in the beginning if is it even realistic to assume there is an actual war on drugs. Benavie explains that society is constantly reminded of the harmful effects of certain drugs such as marijuana, heroin, LSD, ecstasy, cocaine, morphine, methamphetamine, amphetamines, codeine, valium, and narcotics. However, society forgets that there are people out there that take certain drugs for a reason. The drug scene causes many complaints within society as it’s seen as a cause of violence, diseases, corruption, social disorder, and an increase in crime rates. The drug war is probable as drugs are seen as also being sinful, disruptive, a threat to authority of parents and social order, as well as a danger to our economic system. In many instances, those that use drugs illegally are being punished worse than some rapists and murderers. Some of these criminals are also being treated as if they were a murderer. This article raises a lot of questions that some may or may not agree with. Personally, this article has left me confused and very frustrated with our legal systems.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So with this Nixon and the U.S. Congress passed the Controlled Substances Act of 1970. The CSA Title II of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 is the federal U.S drug policy under which the manufacture, importation, possession, use and distribution of certain narcotics, stimulants, depressants, hallucinogens, anabolic steroids and other chemicals ( Reuters). Therefore, since the year of 1970 people have been well aware and informed about the usage and affiliation with drugs. People still dare to challenge the law and that is why they still continue to do these illegal acts. While in the act of being “sneaky” they are put in prison if caught and that’s where the decriminalization act would come into play. Decriminalizing drugs is not making them legal, but instead revolves around criminal charges from the action. Decriminalizing drugs would indeed help keep people out of prison, but at what risk. Drugs are addicting and what happens when a person who uses the first time is caught, what is to happen when they are released and get into a bigger mess and involve more people or lives are lost because this criminal was only a first offense so they had little to no punishment. We do not let murders go if they only kill one person for the first time do we? Although, some people are caught at the wrong time at the wrong place, but that's where law enforcement should step up and go the extra mile to prove the innocent, innocent. That's where our Fifth Amendment rights kick in- innocent until proven guilty- all necessary procedures should be taken to stop an innocent person from being put…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first reason I believe that the approach to criminalization of drugs would not be feasible is because most, if not all, federal drug laws are questionable in character in terms of effectiveness. An example of this is the failure of prohibition in the 1920's. Fast forward to now, this century old issue has now morphed into the war on drugs. The federal government has limited power in that it can only exercise the powers that have been delegated to it. According to the 10th amendment, the rest of the powers are given to the states and the people to protect American democracy. (http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2080345_2080344_2080384,00.html). Therefore, implementing certain drug laws is not a promising approach to combat crime in the United States.…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the arguments against legalization of drugs is what we have all grown up hearing which is “drugs are bad”. This reason has been said throughout most of our life and is what we learn in schools. However, legal drugs like alcohol and tobacco have caused more harm than illegal drugs. Another argument against legalization is that it would send mix signals to children. Drugs are bad and “just say no” have been sayings we have all learned growing up. However, if drugs were suddenly legal children would be confused. The rates of use can fluctuate in high school students with their confusion about drugs. Another argument against legalizing drugs is that the drug epidemic for late 1800s to 1900s ended because of society’s shift in attitude…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The War on Drugs is an unmitigated waste of time money and manpower. While the United States has increased the mandatory minimums, it has done nothing to stem the need for a good buzz. The only thing better than a blunt is a nice piece of chunky monkey all lubed up and ready to go. You can say that drug dealers are evil people, but in reality they are no more than just businessmen. They see a need and they fill it. Prostitutes and drug dealers are no different than a retailer selling any other commodity; they just sell something that is illegal.…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Larry Elder, “The war on drugs is wrong, both tactically and morally. It assumes that people are too stupid, too reckless, and too irresponsible to decide whether and under what conditions to consume drugs. The war on drugs is morally bankrupt” ("war on drugs is wrong, both tactically and morally. It assumes that people are too stupid, too reckless, and too irresponsible to decide whether and under what conditions to consume drugs. The war on drugs is morally bankrupt.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our society is in need of true social reform in order to limit crime, and limit racial and class divides. The War on Drugs has done nothing but being ineffective and is not fair to people of color or to people in a lower class. The War on Drugs has actually been very counterproductive because not only has it ignored the true problems in our society, but it has labeled drug offenders as “evil”. In reality, that is just another prejudice being reinforced through old legislation. In fact, that particular prejudice can even be one of the reasons behind mass incarceration. Many of the offenders in prison today are low ranking drug offenders. Once legislation is put into place by the politicians addressing the true social problems in our country, issues of mass incarceration and false burdening of police can be solved. The way to begin will be for political pressures in the U.S. demanding a new stance on crime. A stance that is neither “law and order”, or “tough on crime”. This is because average crime is not committed for fun, but is committed due to problems that are buried deeply within our political system and started by politicians. A problem started by politicians, should not be blamed on figures who are meant to serve and protect U.S. citizens each and every day. That blame is just another reason for the fearful misinterpretation of those in positions of authority within our…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second part of the statement is “because it does not directly harm others or force them to harm themselves”, it is not a true statement and valid statement, the argument in this statement is that the drug dealers have nothing to do with the drug users action after they sold their illegal drugs to them, It is called illegal drug because it is acquired illegally. An estimated 208 million people internationally consumed illegal drugs, and based on a survey by the Centers for Disease Control, 45% of high school student’s nation wide drank alcohol and about 19.7 smoked pot during a one-month period. Drug users usually start with in the school smoking pot then the pills and then they will try a cocktail of all sorts of drugs, it will eventually ruin their lives, start hearing voices in their head and sooner or later they will loose their mind. There will no affected drug users if there’s no drug dealers, it was made illegal for that reason only.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to the text, “The existing budget to fight the supply of drugs cannot compete with the limitless resources available to drug traffickers”. (R.Dowd, 1997). Even though the U.S. spends millions of dollars every year on the war against drugs, it’s not enough. Tax payers’ dollars are being used to fight drugs, while the drug traffickers have almost “limitless” resources due to the large amount of their gross income. Drugs that are being trafficked in the U.S. are also giving gangs the upper hand with a lot of different things. Drug cartels have so much money, power, and even respect from people and other gangs that it makes it even more difficult to stop them. As stated in the text: “ The U.S. has implemented many innovative ways to reduce drug trafficking over the last 20 years, but still has not been successful and bringing the number down to a tolerable level”. (D.Baum,…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Satire Essay On Drugs

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Legalizing drugs could be one of the smartest, most useful things we could do as a country. Only the ones who chose have to participate. If you don’t want to do drugs, works at a drug store, etc. you are not being asked to. But if these things become a reality, the country will be safer and more prosperous…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As early as the Reagan administration until 1986, there were anti-drug campaign funded by the federal government were their declared $250 million war on drugs. The war on drugs were one of the main reasons for mass incarceration and is responsible for close to over half of the arrest in the United States. According to Lynch (2012), changing of drug laws have caused the increase in the number of prison population and caused the overcrowding of federal penitentiary systems. Alexander (2010) argues that race has an impact on whether or not an individual will be locked up in prison. The new drugs laws have a tendency to target those who are poorer non-white offenders; which subsequently means that more black individuals are being incarcerated…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays