Drones Term Paper

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UVAs) commonly referred to as drones, have been the prime weapon of choice in the U.S. efforts to counteract terrorism. However, with supporters of drone strikes, there are also critics who offer alternatives such as raids, who do not take into account the risk and cost of doing so. Drones are able to carry out the same effects as other military platforms under law, but it is unique in that it is independent from human control, adept to hovering midair for hours while offering top quality surveillance and precise airpower (Brunstetter & Braun). These distinct features are what allow the U.S. an overpowering advantage in targeting terrorists and anti-American militant groups across the borders while minimizing the possibility of civilian casualties and sending forces
This form of selective violence has been useful in deteriorating terrorist organization’s power to plan and engage in action, including politically and violently (Walsh 6). The effects of the drone can be manipulated directly and indirectly. The direct consequence of this strategy forces militants to abandon routine, safe houses, as well as equipment and makes it increasingly challenging to plan and engage in a violent attack. Drone strikes target and kill leaders as well as lower ranked members of organizations. It undermines the operation that is kept afloat by those who possess special skills such as: passport forgers, bomb makers, recruiters, and fundraisers (Byman). The devastation of their secrecy because of drone surveillance hinders their form of communication and forces militants to exercise a less efficient and reliable way to contact one another. In the midst of all these obstacles, it can create an atmosphere of mistrust among the organization as they become increasingly paranoid and wary of potential followers providing intelligence to the Unites